Literature DB >> 33553084

Influence of Empathy Disposition and Risk Perception on the Psychological Impact of Lockdown During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic Outbreak.

Nicola Grignoli1,2, Serena Petrocchi3, Sheila Bernardi4, Ilaria Massari1, Rafael Traber1, Roberto Malacrida4, Luca Gabutti2.   

Abstract

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, and especially in the absence of availability of an effective treatment or a vaccine, the main health measure is neither chemical nor biological, but behavioral. To reduce the exponential growth of infections due to the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and the resulting overburdening of the healthcare system, many European Countries, parts of the US and Switzerland gradually implemented measures of quarantine and isolation defined as lockdown. This consideration leads to the need to understand how individuals are motivated to protect themselves and others. Recent research suggested that prosocial mental dispositions, such as empathy, might promote adherence to social norms of distancing. Other research conducted during the COVID-19 outbreak indicates, however, that empathy levels might fluctuate according to anxiety linked to the risk of death, and this negatively predicted prosocial willingness. The present protocol proposes a study on whether people's empathic dispositions, interacting with the levels of risk, influence the psychological impact of lockdown. The rationale is that emphatic dispositions, encouraging the acceptance of the lockdown, determine a better psychological adaptation and less distress. One retrospective study will be developed in Switzerland and, if the pandemic conditions force a new wave of lockdown on the population, one prospective study as well. A total of 120 participants will be involved, distinguished by their level of objective risk: (1) high objective risk (COVID-19 positive patients, hospitalized in isolation in post-acute phase); (2) moderate objective risk (COVID-19 positive patients, isolated at home); (3) minimum objective risk (non-positive adults, in lockdown). Measures of perceived risk of being contagious for third parties, empathic dispositions and acceptance of lockdown will be collected. The expected results provide important answers related to the immediate impact of empathic dispositions, effective risk and risk perception on the psychological impact of lockdown during a pandemic outbreak. Data gathered from this study could inform policy makers and public health managers about the best communication strategies that will take into account the various stages of health risk and, in particular, to modulate messages to the population aimed at inducing self-isolation behaviors.
Copyright © 2021 Grignoli, Petrocchi, Bernardi, Massari, Traber, Malacrida and Gabutti.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; empathy; ethics; isolation; lockdown; prosocial; psychological distress; risk

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33553084      PMCID: PMC7855966          DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.567337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Public Health        ISSN: 2296-2565


  39 in total

1.  Motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online experiment.

Authors:  Peter D Lunn; Shane Timmons; Cameron A Belton; Martina Barjaková; Hannah Julienne; Ciarán Lavin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

Authors:  Robert L Spitzer; Kurt Kroenke; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-22

3.  Ethics and public health emergencies: restrictions on liberty.

Authors:  Matthew K Wynia
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  The Impact of Quarantine and Physical Distancing Following COVID-19 on Mental Health: Study Protocol of a Multicentric Italian Population Trial.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giallonardo; Gaia Sampogna; Valeria Del Vecchio; Mario Luciano; Umberto Albert; Claudia Carmassi; Giuseppe Carrà; Francesca Cirulli; Bernardo Dell'Osso; Maria Giulia Nanni; Maurizio Pompili; Gabriele Sani; Alfonso Tortorella; Umberto Volpe; Andrea Fiorillo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Relational ethical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  David Ian Jeffrey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Socio-demographic, social, cognitive, and emotional correlates of adherence to physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Gouin; Sasha MacNeil; Andrew Switzer; Emily Carrese-Chacra; Fabien Durif; Bärbel Knäuper
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2021-01-19

7.  A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors.

Authors:  Cristina Mazza; Eleonora Ricci; Silvia Biondi; Marco Colasanti; Stefano Ferracuti; Christian Napoli; Paolo Roma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Improving the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: examining the factors that influence engagement and the impact on individuals.

Authors:  Holly Seale; Clare E F Dyer; Ikram Abdi; Kazi M Rahman; Yanni Sun; Mohammed O Qureshi; Alexander Dowell-Day; Jonathon Sward; M Saiful Islam
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  How behavioural science data helps mitigate the COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Cornelia Betsch
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-05

10.  Psychological consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: The ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study.

Authors:  Achraf Ammar; Patrick Mueller; Khaled Trabelsi; Hamdi Chtourou; Omar Boukhris; Liwa Masmoudi; Bassem Bouaziz; Michael Brach; Marlen Schmicker; Ellen Bentlage; Daniella How; Mona Ahmed; Asma Aloui; Omar Hammouda; Laisa Liane Paineiras-Domingos; Annemarie Braakman-Jansen; Christian Wrede; Sophia Bastoni; Carlos Soares Pernambuco; Leonardo Jose Mataruna-Dos-Santos; Morteza Taheri; Khadijeh Irandoust; Aïmen Khacharem; Nicola L Bragazzi; Jad Adrian Washif; Jordan M Glenn; Nicholas T Bott; Faiez Gargouri; Lotfi Chaari; Hadj Batatia; Samira C Khoshnami; Evangelia Samara; Vasiliki Zisi; Parasanth Sankar; Waseem N Ahmed; Gamal Mohamed Ali; Osama Abdelkarim; Mohamed Jarraya; Kais El Abed; Mohamed Romdhani; Nizar Souissi; Lisette Van Gemert-Pijnen; Stephen J Bailey; Wassim Moalla; Jonathan Gómez-Raja; Monique Epstein; Robbert Sanderman; Sebastian Schulz; Achim Jerg; Ramzi Al-Horani; Taysir Mansi; Mohamed Jmail; Fernando Barbosa; Fernando Ferreira-Santos; Boštjan Šimunič; Rado Pišot; Andrea Gaggioli; Piotr Zmijewski; Jürgen M Steinacker; Jana Strahler; Laurel Riemann; Bryan L Riemann; Notger Mueller; Karim Chamari; Tarak Driss; Anita Hoekelmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trait Empathy Modulates Patterns of Personal and Social Emotions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Yaji He; Jiajia Zhu; Xuhai Chen; Yan Mu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  The interplay between risk and protective factors during the initial height of the COVID-19 crisis in Italy: The role of risk aversion and intolerance of ambiguity on distress.

Authors:  S Petrocchi; P Iannello; G Ongaro; A Antonietti; G Pravettoni
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2021-03-19

3.  Affective empathy predicts self-isolation behaviour acceptance during coronavirus risk exposure.

Authors:  Serena Petrocchi; Nicola Grignoli; Sheila Bernardi; Roberto Malacrida; Rafael Traber; Luca Gabutti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Influence of Post-Traumatic Growth on College Students' Creativity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy and the Moderating Role of Deliberate Rumination.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Yuqing Zeng; Yanhua Xu; Dongtao Huang; Jinlian Shao; Jiamin Wu; Xingrou Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 5.  Face Masks to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Processing, Roles, Requirements, Efficacy, Risk and Sustainability.

Authors:  Md Zillur Rahman; Md Enamul Hoque; Md Rubel Alam; Md Abdur Rouf; Saiful Islam Khan; Huaizhong Xu; Seeram Ramakrishna
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.329

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.