| Literature DB >> 33552828 |
Muhammad Altaf Khan1,2, Saif Ullah3, Sunil Kumar4.
Abstract
The new coronavirus disease is still a major panic for people all over the world. The world is grappling with the second wave of this new pandemic. Different approaches are taken into consideration to tackle this deadly disease. These approaches were suggested in the form of modeling, analysis of the data, controlling the disease spread and clinical perspectives. In all these suggested approaches, the main aim was to eliminate or decrease the infection of the coronavirus from the community. Here, in this paper, we focus on developing a new mathematical model to understand its dynamics and possible control. We formulate the model first in the integer order and then use the Atangana-Baleanu derivative concept with a non-singular kernel for its generalization. We present some of the necessary mathematical aspects of the fractional model. We use a nonlinear fractional Lyapunov function in order to present the global asymptotical stability of the model at the disease-free equilibrium. In order to solve the model numerically in the fractional case, we use an efficient modified Adams-Bashforth scheme. The resulting iterative scheme is then used to demonstrate the detailed simulation results of the ABC mathematical model to examine the importance of the memory index and model parameters on the transmission and control of COVID-19 infection.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33552828 PMCID: PMC7854889 DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01159-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Phys J Plus ISSN: 2190-5444 Impact factor: 3.911
Models parameters and its estimated values
| Parameter | Description | Value/day | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruitment rate | Estimated | ||
| Death rate naturally | [ | ||
| The death rate due to symptomatic infection | 0.0100 | Fitted | |
| Transmissible coefficient rate related to | 0.5932 | Fitted | |
| Incubation period | 0.3233 | Fitted | |
| Proportion of the symptomatic infection | 0.4760 | Fitted | |
| Hospitalized rate for the symptomatic people | 0.3738 | Fitted | |
| Death of the people in the hospitalization class | 0.0131 | Fitted | |
| Death of the people critical-infected class | 0.039 | Fitted | |
| Recovery due to | 0.4368 | Fitted | |
| Recovery due to | 0.2550 | Fitted | |
| Rate of recover of quarantined individuals | 0.2562 | Fitted | |
| Rate of recover of hospitalized individuals | 0.1010 | Fitted | |
| Rate of recover of critically infected individuals | 0.0261 | Fitted | |
| Rate of quarantined for exposed individuals | 0.4818 | Fitted | |
| Transmission coefficient that generate the infection | 0.6349 | Fitted | |
| The rate by which the quarantined are hospitalized | 0.5435 | Fitted | |
| Transmissible coefficient relative to | 0.6312 | Fitted | |
| The individuals movement from | 0.1950 | Fitted |
Fig. 1Comparison of model with real cases: circle denotes real cases, while bold line is the model solution. The data considered here from March 1 to August 31, 2020
Fig. 2Dynamics of suspectable individuals for various values of
Fig. 3Dynamics of exposed individuals for various values of
Fig. 4Dynamics of symptomatic individuals for various values of
Fig. 5Dynamics of asymptomatic individuals for various values of
Fig. 6Dynamics of quarantine individuals for various values of
Fig. 7Dynamics of hospitalized or self-isolated individuals for various values of
Fig. 8Dynamics of critically infected individuals for various values of
Fig. 9Dynamics of recovered individuals for various values of
Fig. 10The effect of (quarantine rate) on the symptomatically infected people for a , b , c , d
Fig. 11The effect (quarantine rate) on the asymptomatically infected people for a , b , c , d