Literature DB >> 33552804

Primary Resection and Immediate Autologous Reconstruction of Fronto-orbital Infantile Myofibromatoses.

Jennifer L Lavie1, Camille L Rogers1, Mark W Stalder1,2, Hugo St Hilaire1,2.   

Abstract

Infantile myofibromatosis is an unusual and rare lesion of the bone and soft tissue, which can be seen in the craniofacial skeleton. These complex tumors present a challenge to craniofacial surgeons regarding diagnosis, management, and safe and effective surgical treatment, frequently requiring complex reconstruction. We present the case of a 7-month-old girl with multicentric infantile myofibromatosis of the right parietal and fronto-orbital region, the associated clinical presentation, histopathologic findings, and surgical management, along with a review of the relevant literature.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552804      PMCID: PMC7858576          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


Infantile myofibromatosis, a term coined by Chung and Enzinger in 1981, is a disease of multiple nonencapsulated, nonmetastasizing, locally infiltrative lesions that involve the soft tissue, muscle, bone, and viscera of infants.[1,2] In 1954, Stout described “congenital generalized fibromatosis” as a benign fibroblastic lesion and distinguished it from other juvenile fibromatoses.[1,3] In 1985, Wiswell classified myofibroblastic soft tissue lesions into 3 categories: solitary myofibromas, and multicentric myofibromatosis with and without visceral involvement.[2,4] Solitary lesions are more common and often affect the head and neck. Multicentric lesions can involve bone, although the majority arise from the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle.[5] The less common visceral lesions have a higher morbidity and mortality than solitary or multicentric lesions.[2,5] Multicentric myofibromatosis frequently represents a diagnostic challenge for surgeons because, although its pathologic findings are well described, its clinical presentation and complex histologic features provide for a broad differential, which can lead to an initial misdiagnosis.[2] The progression of care is complicated by a lack of consensus in managing multicentric lesions. Here, we present a case of infantile multicentric myofibromatoses involving the craniofacial skeleton in a pediatric patient. We discuss histopathology unique to the condition, the surgical resection, and the subsequent reconstruction of the bone defect.

CASE REPORT

A developmentally normal 5-month-old girl presented to pediatric neurosurgery for evaluation of 2 bone nodules of her right fronto-orbital and parietal regions that had been present since birth, increasing in size over the previous 4 months. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed an enhancing right fronto-orbital lesion (2 × 1.8 × 1.5 cm), and an enhancing right parietal lesion (1.5 × 1.0 × 0.5 cm), both concerning for histiocytosis. An excisional biopsy of the more accessible parietal lesion was performed to obtain a tissue diagnosis. Upon presentation to our craniofacial clinic, there was a 3-cm lesion of her right fronto-orbital skeleton just above the right brow. On palpation, the lesion was firm, well circumscribed, and nontender. There was no exophthalmos, strabismus, or proptosis of the right eye or ptosis of the upper lid. The histological review was consistent with a diagnosis of infantile myofibromatosis with spindle cells, scant mitotic figures, and invasion of the surrounding bone. The immunochemistry showed smooth muscle actin but without beta cantenin, suggestive of a nonaggressive lesion. The spindle cells were negative for CD1a, which is inconsistent with a diagnosis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Initially, we closely observed the fronto-orbital lesion, as regression commonly occurs.[2] However, repeat computed topography (CT) imaging at 6 months of age demonstrated significant interval growth (Fig. 1A). Because of the lesion’s intimate relation to the orbit and the possibility of its continued growth damaging the eye, surgical management was indicated.
Fig. 1.

A, Pre-operative 3D reconstruction CT showing interval growth and bony resorption of a right fronto-orbital lesion in a 6 month old. B, En bloc resection of the fronto-orbital infantile myofibromatoses.

A, Pre-operative 3D reconstruction CT showing interval growth and bony resorption of a right fronto-orbital lesion in a 6 month old. B, En bloc resection of the fronto-orbital infantile myofibromatoses. The patient underwent en bloc resection of the lesion with a margin of healthy bone that included a lateral segment of the fronto-orbital rim and a significant portion of the orbital roof (Fig. 1B). The specimen was sent to pathology and was consistent with the parietal lesion. Immediate reconstruction was performed with a segment of full-thickness calvarial bone graft harvested from the right temporo-parietal region and shaped to fit the defect of the fronto-orbital rim and roof. Bioabsorbable polylactic acid plates (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Mich.) were used to reconstruct the parietal donor site defect. Bony contour of the resected structures was reestablished, and the contralateral side was aesthetically matched when the soft tissue was redraped (Fig. 2). Six months follow up demonstrated complete anatomic restoration of the affected segments, with excellent contour and no recurrence.
Fig. 2.

A defect in the right fronto-orbital region of a 6 month old (A) after en bloc resection of infantile myofibromatoses. B, Immediate reconstruction after en bloc resection of infantile myofibromatoses with full thickness calvarial bone graft secured to the right fronto-orbital rim and roof, as well as absorbable plate reconstruction of the parietal donor site defect.

A defect in the right fronto-orbital region of a 6 month old (A) after en bloc resection of infantile myofibromatoses. B, Immediate reconstruction after en bloc resection of infantile myofibromatoses with full thickness calvarial bone graft secured to the right fronto-orbital rim and roof, as well as absorbable plate reconstruction of the parietal donor site defect.

DISCUSSION

The clinical presentation of infantile myofibromatosis, mostly presenting during the first year of life, includes nodules that are painless, well-encapsulated, rubbery to hard in texture, and freely mobile to fixed.[1,6] The orbit is a common location for solitary lesions; however, there are few reported cases of multicentric lesions involving the craniofacial skeleton without visceral involvement.[1] Mynatt et al. reviewed 24 cases from the English literature, and only 1 had multicentric disease with orbital involvement, similar to our patient.[2] Morbidity is related to the locally infiltrative nature of the lesions, and multicentric lesions of the head and neck can cause significant problems due to extrinsic compression of nearby structures. Some of the reported complications include stridor in cases of lesions of the larynx, proptosis, eyelid ptosis, displacement of the globe, and development of astigmatism with orbital lesions, and nasal obstruction with lesions of the nasal bones.[2,5-7] Infantile myofibromatosis can have a benign radiographic appearance while ultimately being locally destructive, as in our patient. In craniofacial and calvarial involvement, the lesions are often radiolucent with a sclerotic rim. The differential diagnoses for these findings include both Histiocytosis X and fibrous dysplasia, all having similar clinical presentations in the craniofacial skeleton.[8,9] Thus, the histopathologic analysis is critical for definitive diagnosis.[5] Defining features of these lesions are their nodularity and myofibroblastic appearance.[8] They possess a combination of spindled, fibroblast-like cells and fusiform, smooth muscle-like cells with elongated fasicular nuclei and a central hemangiopericytoma pattern. There are, on average, 3–4 mitotic figures per high power fields with mild or no atypia.[1,5,8] Currently there exists no definitive treatment algorithm for multicentric infantile myfibromatosis. Fortunately, spontaneous regression is common; so patients are frequently managed with observation. Nonsurgical methods of treatment are available, including corticosteroids, chemotherapeutic agents, or radiotherapy, but these can introduce a significant risk of adverse outcomes in infants and children.[2,10] Thus, clinical judgment is essential when there exists a risk of significant morbidity, which necessitates operative intervention.[6,7,10] Although reported recurrence rates are relatively low (7%), complete local excision with immediate reconstruction is recommended in surgical cases.[2,6,8]

CONCLUSIONS

Infantile myofibromatosis is a unique clinical and pathologic condition that may be treated with observation and nonsurgical measures, as many cases spontaneously regress. However, surgical resection is recommended if there is an apparent or impending mass effect with the potential to result in detrimental functional or aesthetically morbid outcomes. In our patient, resection and immediate autologous reconstruction was indicated to prevent impending orbital compression and visual impairment, which was performed with a very satisfactory reconstructive result without complications.
  10 in total

1.  Head and neck infantile myofibromatosis--a report of three cases.

Authors:  N Loundon; T Dedieuleveult; D Ayache; G Roger; P Josset; E N Garabedian
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 2.  Orbital infantile myofibroma: a case report and clinicopathologic review of 24 cases from the literature.

Authors:  Corey J Mynatt; Kenneth A Feldman; Lester D R Thompson
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2011-04-22

3.  Juvenile fibromatoses.

Authors:  A P STOUT
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1954-09       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Isolated infantile myofibromatosis of the upper eyelid: uncommon localization and long-term results after surgical management.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Gatibelza; Birmania Ramos Vazquez; Natacha Bereni; Danièle Denis; Jacques Bardot; Nathalie Degardin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Infantile myofibromatosis.

Authors:  T E Wiswell; E L Sakas; S R Stephenson; J J Lesica; S R Reddoch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Infantile myofibromatosis.

Authors:  E B Chung; F M Enzinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  A rare case of infantile myofibromatosis and review of literature.

Authors:  Peter A Hausbrandt; Andreas Leithner; Alfred Beham; Koppany Bodo; Johannes Raith; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Infantile myofibromatosis: a series of 28 cases.

Authors:  Jacob Mashiah; Smail Hadj-Rabia; Anne Dompmartin; Annie Harroche; Etty Laloum-Grynberg; Michèle Wolter; Jean-Claude Amoric; Dominique Hamel-Teillac; Stéphane Guero; Sylvie Fraitag; Christine Bodemer
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Solitary congenital fibromatosis (infantile myofibromatosis) of bone.

Authors:  C Y Inwards; K K Unni; J W Beabout; T C Shives
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  Involvement of the bony orbit in infantile myofibromatosis.

Authors:  Antonio Augusto V Cruz; Elizabeth M Maia; Tiana G Burmamm; Luiz C Perez; Andreia N Santos; Elvis T Valera; Luis G Tone
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.746

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.