Literature DB >> 33552795

The Impact of Country Self-Citation Rate Among Medical Specialties in Saudi Arabia.

Anas M Bardeesi1, Aimun A Jamjoom2, Abdulhadi Algahtani1, Abdulhakim Jamjoom1.   

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of country self-citation rate (SCR) among medical specialties in Saudi Arabia, and to assess the impact of self-citations on the country's total cites world ranking in different specialties. Methods SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) was used to collect data related to all medical specialties in Saudi Arabia for the period 1996-2019. The country SCR for the specialties was correlated with several bibliometric parameters and examined statistically. The specialties that showed a drop in Saudi Arabia's total cites world ranking following the exclusion of self-citations were identified. Results The median country SCR for 46 specialties in Saudi Arabia was 9.5% (range: 4.6-23.1%). The two specialties with the highest country SCR were Public Health (23.1%) and Family Practice (22.9%). Country SCR was significantly higher in the non-clinical specialties compared to clinical specialties (15.3% vs. 9.6%). It did not correlate significantly with any of the examined productivity indices. The exclusion of self-citations resulted in a drop in Saudi Arabia's total cites world ranking in six (13%) specialties only. There was no significant difference between the country's total cites and net total cites world rankings in the specialties. Conclusions Self-citation may be appropriate and signify an expansion of the authors' previous work. Country SCR in medical specialties in Saudi Arabia is relatively low and not affected by total documents and total cites. Non-clinical specialties tend to self-cite more. The exclusion of self-citations had minimal effect on Saudi Arabia's total cites world ranking, indicating that country SCR in the specialties is unlikely to impact its international scientific standing. Our findings do not support the argument for eliminating self-citation from citation-based metrics. We believe that more collaborative and global research practices should be encouraged.
Copyright © 2021, Bardeesi et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bibliometrics; citation metrics; cites per document; country self-citation; medical specialty; saudi arabia; scimago journal & country rank; self-citation rate; total cites; total documents

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552795      PMCID: PMC7859567          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  14 in total

1.  The impact of self-citation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Foley; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Artifactual increase in journal self-citation.

Authors:  Patrick Tighe; Kevin J Rice; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Mark J Rice
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Journal Self-Citation Rates and Impact Factors in Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine: A 3-year Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Christos Livas; Konstantina Delli
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.267

5.  Country over-citation ratios.

Authors:  Victoria Bakare; Grant Lewison
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.238

6.  Publication integrity in orthopaedic journals: the self-citation in orthopaedic research (SCOR) threshold.

Authors:  Kavin Sundaram; Jared Warren; Hiba K Anis; Alison K Klika; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-20

7.  Comparison of journal self-citation rates between some Chinese and non-Chinese international journals.

Authors:  Zu-Guo Yang; Feng Gao; Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Author self-citation in the general medicine literature.

Authors:  Abhaya V Kulkarni; Brittany Aziz; Iffat Shams; Jason W Busse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Self-citation in Iran in Comparison with Other Countries.

Authors:  Mousa Yaminfirooz; Aram Tirgar
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2019-12

10.  Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Baccini; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Eugenio Petrovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Global university performance. Bibliometric analysis of the ARWU platform (2003-2020).

Authors:  Ahmed Ben Abdelaziz; Sarra Melki; Donia Ben Hassine; Sarra Nouira; Dhekra Chebil; Asma Ben Abdelaziz; Mohamed Azzaza
Journal:  Tunis Med       Date:  2021 Juillet

2.  Author Self-Citation in the Turkish Otorhinolaryngology Literature.

Authors:  Ali Bayram
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 3.  Research trends in ulcerative colitis: A bibliometric and visualized study from 2011 to 2021.

Authors:  Tai Zhang; Beihua Zhang; Wende Tian; Fengyun Wang; Jiaqi Zhang; Xiangxue Ma; Yuchen Wei; Xudong Tang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.988

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.