Literature DB >> 33552779

Comparing the Effects of General Versus Regional Anesthesia on Postoperative Mortality in Total and Partial Hip Arthroplasty.

Irfan A Khan1, Raihan Noman1, Nabeel Markatia1, Grettel Castro1, Pura Rodriguez de la Vega1, Juan Ruiz-Pelaez1.   

Abstract

Purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and partial hip arthroplasty (PHA) are performed in patients with hip joint dysfunction such as osteoarthritis or hip fractures and are associated with complications including mortality. There is a lack of evidence in the literature regarding whether the type of anesthesia (regional vs. general) is associated with increased postoperative mortality in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. The present study compares early postoperative mortality between general or regional anesthesia administered to patients undergoing either THA or PHA. Methods A retrospective cohort was assembled using the 2015-2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under general or regional anesthesia were included. Patients were excluded if receiving any other type of anesthesia, as well as having an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification score ≥ 4, preoperative acute renal failure, severe congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or ascites. Adjusted odds of 30 days all-cause postoperative mortality according to the type of anesthesia were estimated by fitting multiple logistic regression models that included potential confounders and effect modifiers. Results A total of 60,897 patients were included in the study. Given that the interaction between the type of anesthesia and the type of arthroplasty was statistically significant, separated models were fitted for each type of arthroplasty. There was no evidence of an association between type of anesthesia and postoperative mortality in hip arthroplasty patients regardless of whether the arthroplasty was partial (odds ratio {OR} = 0.85; confidence interval {CI} 0.59-1.22) or total (OR = 0.68; CI 0.43-1.08). Conclusion The overall early postoperative mortality in adult hip arthroplasty patients is low in the absence of risk factors such as severe CHF, COPD, ascites, acute renal failure, and ASA score of 4 or higher. Our findings suggest there is no association between the type of anesthesia received (general vs. regional) and early postoperative mortality rates in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, regardless of type (total vs. partial).
Copyright © 2021, Khan et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general anesthesia; partial hip arthroplasty; postoperative mortality; regional anesthesia; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552779      PMCID: PMC7854317          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  20 in total

1.  The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Thomas P Vail; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  JAMA patient page. Regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Janet M Torpy; Cassio Lynm; Robert M Golub
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030.

Authors:  Matthew Sloan; Ajay Premkumar; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Total Hip Replacement in Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head.

Authors:  H L Kakaria; A K Sharma; Babu Sebastian
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 5.  Neuraxial vs general anaesthesia for total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative-effectiveness research.

Authors:  R L Johnson; S L Kopp; C M Burkle; C M Duncan; A K Jacob; P J Erwin; M H Murad; C B Mantilla
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad A Helwani; Michael S Avidan; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Dagmar J Kaiser; John C Clohisy; Bruce L Hall; Heiko A Kaiser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Does regional anaesthesia improve outcome after total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  A J R Macfarlane; G A Prasad; V W S Chan; R Brull
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  General anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Pu; Jian-Ming Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Mortality after total hip replacement surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  J R Berstock; A D Beswick; E Lenguerrand; M R Whitehouse; A W Blom
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Efficacy and Safety of 3 Different Anesthesia Techniques Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chengwei Liang; Jionglin Wei; Xiaoxi Cai; Weilong Lin; Yongqian Fan; Fengjian Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-08-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Anesthesia Type and Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Receiving Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Frank R Chen; Theodore Quan; Sabrina Pan; Joseph E Manzi; Melina Recarey; Amil R Agarwal; Allen Nicholson; Zachary R Zimmer; Lawrence Gulotta; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2022-03-03

2.  Anesthetic Effect of the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block with Different Approaches on Total Hip Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammation.

Authors:  Tengchen Feng; Jibo Zhao; Jiayi Wang; Xiaojia Sun; Tong Jia; Fulong Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.