Literature DB >> 33552736

Identification of an immune prognostic 11-gene signature for lung adenocarcinoma.

Tao Yang1, Lizheng Hao1, Renyun Cui1, Huanyu Liu1, Jian Chen1, Jiongjun An1, Shuo Qi2, Zhong Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immunological tumour microenvironment (TME) has occupied a very important position in the beginning and progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains poor for the local progression and widely metastases at the time of clinical diagnosis. Our objective is to identify a potential signature model to improve prognosis of LUAD.
METHODS: With the aim to identify a novel immune prognostic signature associated with overall survival (OS), we analysed LUADs extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Immune scores and stromal scores of TCGA-LUAD were downloaded from Estimation of STromal and Immune cells in MAlignant Tumour tissues Expression using data (ESTIMATE). LASSO COX regression was applied to build the prediction model. Then, the prognostic gene signature was validated in the GSE68465 dataset.
RESULTS: The data from TCGA datasets showed patients in stage I and stage II had higher stromal scores than patients in stage IV (P < 0.05), and for immune score patients in stage I were higher than patients in stage III and stage IV (P < 0.05). The improved overall survivals were observed in high stromal score and immune score groups. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited the inferior OS (P = 2.501e - 05). By validating the 397 LUAD patients from GSE68465, we observed a better OS in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group, which is consistent with the results from the TCGA cohort. Nomogram results showed that practical and predicted survival coincided very well, especially for 3-year survival.
CONCLUSION: We obtained an 11 immune score related gene signature model as an independent element to effectively classify LUADs into different risk groups, which might provide a support for precision treatments. Moreover, immune score may play a potential valuable sole for estimating OS in LUADs. ©2021 Yang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene signature; LUAD; Prognosis; TME

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552736      PMCID: PMC7825366          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  47 in total

1.  Sequential ALK Inhibitors Can Select for Lorlatinib-Resistant Compound ALK Mutations in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Aaron N Hata; Alice T Shaw; Satoshi Yoda; Jessica J Lin; Michael S Lawrence; Benjamin J Burke; Luc Friboulet; Adam Langenbucher; Leila Dardaei; Kylie Prutisto-Chang; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Sergei Timofeevski; Harper Hubbeling; Justin F Gainor; Lorin A Ferris; Amanda K Riley; Krystina E Kattermann; Daria Timonina; Rebecca S Heist; A John Iafrate; Cyril H Benes; Jochen K Lennerz; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman; Ted W Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 2.  Targeting autophagy in cancer.

Authors:  Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Christina G Towers; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Daniel Morgensztern; Chris Boshoff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Alectinib for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ashley C Ly; Jacqueline L Olin; Morgan B Smith
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Tracking the Evolution of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; Gareth A Wilson; Nicholas McGranahan; Nicolai J Birkbak; Thomas B K Watkins; Selvaraju Veeriah; Seema Shafi; Diana H Johnson; Richard Mitter; Rachel Rosenthal; Max Salm; Stuart Horswell; Mickael Escudero; Nik Matthews; Andrew Rowan; Tim Chambers; David A Moore; Samra Turajlic; Hang Xu; Siow-Ming Lee; Martin D Forster; Tanya Ahmad; Crispin T Hiley; Christopher Abbosh; Mary Falzon; Elaine Borg; Teresa Marafioti; David Lawrence; Martin Hayward; Shyam Kolvekar; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Sam M Janes; Ricky Thakrar; Asia Ahmed; Fiona Blackhall; Yvonne Summers; Rajesh Shah; Leena Joseph; Anne M Quinn; Phil A Crosbie; Babu Naidu; Gary Middleton; Gerald Langman; Simon Trotter; Marianne Nicolson; Hardy Remmen; Keith Kerr; Mahendran Chetty; Lesley Gomersall; Dean A Fennell; Apostolos Nakas; Sridhar Rathinam; Girija Anand; Sajid Khan; Peter Russell; Veni Ezhil; Babikir Ismail; Melanie Irvin-Sellers; Vineet Prakash; Jason F Lester; Malgorzata Kornaszewska; Richard Attanoos; Haydn Adams; Helen Davies; Stefan Dentro; Philippe Taniere; Brendan O'Sullivan; Helen L Lowe; John A Hartley; Natasha Iles; Harriet Bell; Yenting Ngai; Jacqui A Shaw; Javier Herrero; Zoltan Szallasi; Roland F Schwarz; Aengus Stewart; Sergio A Quezada; John Le Quesne; Peter Van Loo; Caroline Dive; Allan Hackshaw; Charles Swanton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Impact of aging on host immune response and survival in melanoma: an analysis of 3 patient cohorts.

Authors:  Sarah A Weiss; Joseph Han; Farbod Darvishian; Jeremy Tchack; Sung Won Han; Karolina Malecek; Michelle Krogsgaard; Iman Osman; Judy Zhong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  ET-GRU: using multi-layer gated recurrent units to identify electron transport proteins.

Authors:  Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le; Edward Kien Yee Yapp; Hui-Yuan Yeh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  LGALS3 is connected to CD74 in a previously unknown protein network that is associated with poor survival in patients with AML.

Authors:  Peter P Ruvolo; Chenyue W Hu; Yihua Qiu; Vivian R Ruvolo; Robin L Go; Stefan E Hubner; Kevin R Coombes; Michael Andreeff; Amina A Qutub; Steven M Kornblau
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 8.143

9.  Systematic construction and validation of an immune prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chenghan Luo; Mengyuan Lei; Yixia Zhang; Qian Zhang; Lifeng Li; Jingyao Lian; Shasha Liu; Liping Wang; Guofu Pi; Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  BIRC3 alterations in chronic and B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia patients.

Authors:  Eyad Alhourani; Moneeb A K Othman; Joana B Melo; Isabel M Carreira; Beata Grygalewicz; Dragana Vujić; Zeljko Zecević; Gordana Joksić; Anita Glaser; Beate Pohle; Cordula Schlie; Sven Hauke; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.967

View more
  4 in total

1.  miR-873 and miR-105-2 May Affect the Tumour Microenvironment and are Potential Biomarkers for Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Yan Liu; Zhihong Xu; Quan Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  A nomogram based on A-to-I RNA editing predicting overall survival of patients with lung squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Li Liu; Jun Liu; Xiaoliang Deng; Li Tu; Zhuxiang Zhao; Chenli Xie; Lei Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A robust CD8+ T cell-related classifier for predicting the prognosis and efficacy of immunotherapy in stage III lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jinteng Feng; Longwen Xu; Shirong Zhang; Luying Geng; Tian Zhang; Yang Yu; Rui Yuan; Yusheng He; Zhuhui Nan; Min Lin; Hui Guo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Identification of Prognostic Fatty Acid Metabolism lncRNAs and Potential Molecular Targeting Drugs in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Rui Tian; Xin Liu; Meijiao Song; Lu Liu; Rong Guo; Zhuoya Li; Xiaomin Hu; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.