Literature DB >> 33552730

The influence of rare birds on observer effort and subsequent rarity discovery in the American birdwatching community.

Jesse A Laney1, Tyler A Hallman2, Jenna R Curtis2,3, W Douglas Robinson2.   

Abstract

Birdwatching is a rapidly growing pastime, increasingly involving the pursuit of rare birds as birders build lists of species they encounter. We expected reports of rare bird discoveries to quickly draw birders to locations, and that the increased attention at those locations would decay over time. We hypothesized that magnitude of draw and rates of decay would vary depending on characteristics of the species and the geographic locations where rarities were discovered. Discoveries of additional rarities might affect both the draw and decay, so we also quantified empirical evidence for the Patagonia Picnic Table Effect (PPTE), a social feedback loop where rarity discoveries are presumed to lead to additional rarity discoveries because of the elevated levels of birder activity once an initial rarity is reported. Although commonly invoked, supporting evidence for the PPTE hypothesis is anecdotal. We used 10 years of eBird data (2008-2017) in the United States to (1) understand birding activity when rarities were reported and the factors associated with draw and decay, and (2) assess the frequency at which initial rarity discoveries lead to reports of additional rarities. Across 273 rarity events, birder effort, as indexed by numbers of eBird checklists, increased above the pre-event baseline level, with the magnitude of draw varying geographically. We found no indication that draw was influenced by species identity or rarity-level, but latitude and distance to small airport proved important in drawing additional eBirders to rare bird discoveries. Mean draw of rarities and mean number of checklists from the same locations prior to each rarity discovery grew through the ten years, suggesting an increased influence of eBird on birder behavior in general. Decay rates in birder effort were more gradual in rare bird events with longer durations. Effort declined below baseline-levels after rarities went undetected, suggesting, "location-fatigue" following rarity events. Results did not support the PPTE hypothesis. Controlling for site-specific circumstances, birders had no better chance of finding additional rarities during events than at times outside events. Our results emphasize that eBird checklist quantity at rarity events follows a predictable but variable pattern of draw and decay influenced by location and time since rarity discovery; that birders have statistically similar chances of finding rarities during normal "baseline" birding activities as they do when known rarities are present; and that eBird represents a largely untapped resource for studying factors that influence levels of birding activity. ©2021 Laney et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birder behavior; Birding; Birdwatching; Citizen science; Crowd-sourced data; Patagonia Picnic Table Effect; Rare birds; Twitchers; Twitching; eBird

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552730      PMCID: PMC7827972          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  4 in total

1.  Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding.

Authors:  Rochelle Steven; James C R Smart; Clare Morrison; J Guy Castley
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  Characterizing the cultural niches of North American birds.

Authors:  Justin G Schuetz; Alison Johnston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Weekend bias in Citizen Science data reporting: implications for phenology studies.

Authors:  Jason R Courter; Ron J Johnson; Claire M Stuyck; Brian A Lang; Evan W Kaiser
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  eBird: engaging birders in science and conservation.

Authors:  Chris Wood; Brian Sullivan; Marshall Iliff; Daniel Fink; Steve Kelling
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 8.029

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.