Literature DB >> 33552721

Description and rediagnosis of the crested hadrosaurid (Ornithopoda) dinosaur Parasaurolophus cyrtocristatus on the basis of new cranial remains.

Terry A Gates1,2,3, David C Evans4, Joseph J W Sertich5.   

Abstract

For nearly 60 years, skulls of Parasaurolophus species have been differentiated primarily on the basis of crest shape rather than on unique morphologic characters of other cranial elements. Complicating matters is the fact that crests dramatically change shape throughout ontogeny. Without a complete growth series, it has become difficult to assess the taxonomic distinctness of each species through the lens of allometric growth. Parasaurolophus cyrtocristatus has proven to be especially troublesome to assess because of the poorly preserved nature of the type and only skull. A new, partial skull from the Fossil Forest Member of the Fruitland Formation-the same geologic unit as the type specimen-is the first opportunity to re-diagnose this species as well as redefine the genus with many new traits. An undescribed, short-crested subadult skull from the Kaiparowits Formation of Utah previously assigned to cf. P. cyrtocristatus allows detailed comparisons to be made between the unnamed Utah taxon and the material of this species from the type locality. We find that several characteristics of the squamosal, supraoccipital, and premaxilla shared between the referred skull and the type skull are unique to P. cyrtocristatus (senso stricto) within the genus, irrespective of the overall crest shape. A phylogenetic analysis that includes six new characters posits that P. cyrtocristatus and P. tubicen are sister taxa, and that the latter does not share a closest common ancestor with the long-crested P. walkeri as previously hypothesized. This result helps to explain why both taxa are found in northeastern New Mexico, USA and in sequential geologic units (Fruitland Formation and Kirtland Formation, respectively). Additionally, the exquisitely preserved new skull provides the first opportunity to unequivocally identify the osteological make-up of the Parasaurolophus cranial crest. Unlike in previous reconstructions, the crest composition in Parasaurolophus follows what is seen in other lambeosaurines such as Corythosaurus, where the dorsal process of the premaxilla dominates the crest, with the nasal forming 80% of the ventral paired tubes, and the lateral premaxillary process acting a lateral cover between the dorsal and ventral tubes. The skull of P. cyrtocristatus is still incompletely known, so more complete material will likely reveal new features that further differentiate this species and aid in determining the pace of ornamental crest evolution.
© 2021 Gates et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Campanian; Crest; Cretaceous; Dinosaur; Ontogeny; Phylogeny; Sexual selection; Taxonomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552721      PMCID: PMC7842145          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  10 in total

1.  Ontogeny in the tube-crested dinosaur Parasaurolophus (Hadrosauridae) and heterochrony in hadrosaurids.

Authors:  Andrew A Farke; Derek J Chok; Annisa Herrero; Brandon Scolieri; Sarah Werning
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Mechanical influences on suture development and patency.

Authors:  Susan W Herring
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2008

3.  A new southern Laramidian ankylosaurid, Akainacephalus johnsoni gen. et sp. nov., from the upper Campanian Kaiparowits Formation of southern Utah, USA.

Authors:  Jelle P Wiersma; Randall B Irmis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  A biometric study of suture fusion and skull growth in peccaries.

Authors:  S W Herring
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1974

5.  Transitional evolutionary forms in chasmosaurine ceratopsid dinosaurs: evidence from the Campanian of New Mexico.

Authors:  Denver W Fowler; Elizabeth A Freedman Fowler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Mountain building triggered late cretaceous North American megaherbivore dinosaur radiation.

Authors:  Terry A Gates; Albert Prieto-Márquez; Lindsay E Zanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A new saurolophine dinosaur from the latest cretaceous of far Eastern Russia.

Authors:  Pascal Godefroit; Yuri L Bolotsky; Pascaline Lauters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A new basal hadrosauroid dinosaur (Dinosauria: Ornithopoda) with transitional features from the late cretaceous of Henan Province, China.

Authors:  Hai Xing; Deyou Wang; Fenglu Han; Corwin Sullivan; Qingyu Ma; Yiming He; David W E Hone; Ronghao Yan; Fuming Du; Xing Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A new ankylosaurid dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous (Kirtlandian) of New Mexico with implications for ankylosaurid diversity in the Upper Cretaceous of western North America.

Authors:  Victoria M Arbour; Michael E Burns; Robert M Sullivan; Spencer G Lucas; Amanda K Cantrell; Joshua Fry; Thomas L Suazo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Revised geochronology, correlation, and dinosaur stratigraphic ranges of the Santonian-Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) formations of the Western Interior of North America.

Authors:  Denver Warwick Fowler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The phylogenetic nomenclature of ornithischian dinosaurs.

Authors:  Daniel Madzia; Victoria M Arbour; Clint A Boyd; Andrew A Farke; Penélope Cruzado-Caballero; David C Evans
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  An Italian dinosaur Lagerstätte reveals the tempo and mode of hadrosauriform body size evolution.

Authors:  Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza; Matteo Fabbri; Lorenzo Consorti; Marco Muscioni; David C Evans; Juan L Cantalapiedra; Federico Fanti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.