Literature DB >> 33552712

A three-dimensional approach to visualize pairwise morphological variation and its application to fragmentary palaeontological specimens.

Matt A White1,2, Nicolás E Campione1.   

Abstract

Classifying isolated vertebrate bones to a high level of taxonomic precision can be difficult. Many of Australia's Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrate fossil-bearing deposits, for example, produce large numbers of isolated bones and very few associated or articulated skeletons. Identifying these often fragmentary remains beyond high-level taxonomic ranks, such as Ornithopoda or Theropoda, is difficult and those classified to lower taxonomic levels are often debated. The ever-increasing accessibility to 3D-based comparative techniques has allowed palaeontologists to undertake a variety of shape analyses, such as geometric morphometrics, that although powerful and often ideal, require the recognition of diagnostic landmarks and the generation of sufficiently large data sets to detect clusters and accurately describe major components of morphological variation. As a result, such approaches are often outside the scope of basic palaeontological research that aims to simply identify fragmentary specimens. Herein we present a workflow in which pairwise comparisons between fragmentary fossils and better known exemplars are digitally achieved through three-dimensional mapping of their surface profiles and the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. To showcase this methodology, we compared a fragmentary theropod ungual (NMV P186153) from Victoria, Australia, identified as a neovenatorid, with the manual unguals of the megaraptoran Australovenator wintonensis (AODF604). We discovered that NMV P186153 was a near identical match to AODF604 manual ungual II-3, differing only in size, which, given their 10-15Ma age difference, suggests stasis in megaraptoran ungual morphology throughout this interval. Although useful, our approach is not free of subjectivity; care must be taken to eliminate the effects of broken and incomplete surfaces and identify the human errors incurred during scaling, such as through replication. Nevertheless, this approach will help to evaluate and identify fragmentary remains, adding a quantitative perspective to an otherwise qualitative endeavour.
© 2021 White and Campione.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australovenator; Megaraptorid; NMV P186153; Pairwise

Year:  2021        PMID: 33552712      PMCID: PMC7821773          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  27 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  A southern tyrant reptile.

Authors:  Roger B J Benson; Paul M Barrett; Tom H Rich; Pat Vickers-Rich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania.

Authors:  Philipp Gunz; Philipp Mitteroecker; Simon Neubauer; Gerhard W Weber; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 4.  A virtual world of paleontology.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; Imran A Rahman; Stephan Lautenschlager; Emily J Rayfield; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Morphological integration and functional modularity in the crocodilian skull.

Authors:  Paolo Piras; Angela D Buscalioni; Luciano Teresi; Pasquale Raia; Gabriele Sansalone; Tassos Kotsakis; Jorge Cubo
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.654

6.  New forearm elements discovered of holotype specimen Australovenator wintonensis from Winton, Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Matt A White; Alex G Cook; Scott A Hocknull; Trish Sloan; George H K Sinapius; David A Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analyzing taphonomic deformation of ankylosaur skulls using retrodeformation and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Victoria M Arbour; Philip J Currie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reconstructing the past: methods and techniques for the digital restoration of fossils.

Authors:  Stephan Lautenschlager
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  Open data and digital morphology.

Authors:  Thomas G Davies; Imran A Rahman; Stephan Lautenschlager; John A Cunningham; Robert J Asher; Paul M Barrett; Karl T Bates; Stefan Bengtson; Roger B J Benson; Doug M Boyer; José Braga; Jen A Bright; Leon P A M Claessens; Philip G Cox; Xi-Ping Dong; Alistair R Evans; Peter L Falkingham; Matt Friedman; Russell J Garwood; Anjali Goswami; John R Hutchinson; Nathan S Jeffery; Zerina Johanson; Renaud Lebrun; Carlos Martínez-Pérez; Jesús Marugán-Lobón; Paul M O'Higgins; Brian Metscher; Maëva Orliac; Timothy B Rowe; Martin Rücklin; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra; Neil H Shubin; Selena Y Smith; J Matthias Starck; Chris Stringer; Adam P Summers; Mark D Sutton; Stig A Walsh; Vera Weisbecker; Lawrence M Witmer; Stephen Wroe; Zongjun Yin; Emily J Rayfield; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  New theropod remains and implications for megaraptorid diversity in the Winton Formation (lower Upper Cretaceous), Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Matt A White; Phil R Bell; Stephen F Poropat; Adele H Pentland; Samantha L Rigby; Alex G Cook; Trish Sloan; David A Elliott
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.