Literature DB >> 3355264

Long-term follow-up of patients with biopsy-proven benign breast disease.

H B Ris1, U Niederer, H Stirnemann, J E Doran, A Zimmermann.   

Abstract

Three hundred sixty-five patients with biopsy-proven benign breast disease were followed annually in a prospective manner for 4-15 years to analyze breast cancer development, recurrence, and efficacy of management during follow-up. Eleven breast cancers developed in 11 patients during follow-up, giving a 2.6-fold increased cancer risk over the reference population. No association was found between patients who developed cancer and those who did not with respect to the initial histologic feature (p = 0.62), the age at entry by decades (p = 0.40), and relative to menopause (p = 0.54), the presence of cysts (p = 0.87), or calcification (p = 0.74) in the biopsy specimen, a family history of breast cancer (p = 0.80), or the number of observation years (p = 0.27). We conclude that an aggressive approach to benign breast disease is not justified for any type of lesion as defined in this report. Benign breast disease does not inevitably lead to recurrence. Moreover, 41% of our patients never had any recurrence and were free of symptoms during follow-up; 67% never had a mammogram and 82% never required a further operation. There was no association with initial histologic feature in patients who had clinical examination only and those who had mammogram, biopsy, or both during follow-up (p = 0.93). Mammograms were mainly used to clarify a clinical recurrence than as a screening tool, regardless of histologic feature (p = 0.76). Mammograms were mainly used in premenopausal patients (p less than 0.001) having lumps (p less than 0.001), namely, the most difficult patients for radiologic interpretation. This may be one important reason for the rather low sensitivity (75%) and specificity (40%) of mammography in this report. In conclusion, clinical examination is the outstanding investigational tool to follow patients with biopsy-proven benign breast disease, especially in young premenopausal patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3355264      PMCID: PMC1493420          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198804000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions.

Authors:  S R Wellings; H M Jensen; R G Marcum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Chronic mastopathy and breast cancer. A follow-up study.

Authors:  D Kodlin; E E Winger; N L Morgenstern; U Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Conventional mammography, physical examination, thermography and xeroradiography in the detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  R L Egan; G T Goldstein; M M McSweeney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Error-rates in screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; R E Clifford; B E Nathan; J L Price; I Burn
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1979-06

5.  Can breast carcinoma be anticipated? A follow-up of benign breast biopsies.

Authors:  J F Potter; W P Slimbaugh; S C Woodward
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Mammography: a surgeon's experience.

Authors:  J E Devitt
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-06-09       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Mammography in symptomatic women 50 years of age and under, and those over 50.

Authors:  R A Egeli; J A Urban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Relation between component parts of fibrocystic disease complex and breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Page; R Vander Zwaag; L W Rogers; L T Williams; W E Walker; W H Hartmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Mammography. An aid or distractor in diagnosis?

Authors:  J Nettlefold; G H Jones; R B Black
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1979-06-16       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  The diagnostic efficacy of mammography and palpation in early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  M Rosselli Del Turco; G Giannardi; N Villari
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1980-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Atypical hyperplasia and breast cancer risk: a critique.

Authors:  L Ma; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Clinicopathologic profile of benign breast conditions in Indian women: prospective study based on aberrations of normal development and involution classification.

Authors:  Navneet Kaur; Nitin Agarwal; Pankaj Panwar; Kiran Mishra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Benign breast disease and changes in mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Mandy Goldberg; Parisa Tehranifar; Karin B Michels; Barbara A Cohn; Julie D Flom; Ying Wei; Piera Cirillo; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.