Literature DB >> 33552567

Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008-2014).

Alfredo Harb-De la Rosa1, Jenny Garcia-Castaneda1, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu2, Jiping Zeng1, Ken Batai1, Benjamin R Lee1, Juan Chipollini1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex procedure with high perioperative morbidity. In an effort to reduce complications, robotic-assisted RC (RARC) has been adopted as a minimally invasive alternative to the open approach (ORC). Herein, we examine post-operative outcomes of the two surgical approaches in the United States (US) using a large all-payer database.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-9) codes, patient who underwent RC were captured from National Inpatient Sample (2008-2014). ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify post-operative complications. Trends in the utilization of RARC were analyzed. Logistic and log-linear regression accounting for hospital sample weights and sampling years were performed to analyze outcomes after adjustment of pertinent covariates.
RESULTS: Of 11,189 patients, 14% underwent RARC. RARC was performed in more teaching hospitals, male patients, those with private insurance, and lower comorbidity score. Performance of RARC steadily increased over the study period (p <0.01). In the last year of the study, 22.8% of cases performed robotically. The weighted average length-of-stay were 10.4 and 8.79 days for ORC and RARC, respectively (p <0.01). In multivariable analyses, RARC was associated with decreased blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition, pneumonia, surgical-site infection, wound and respiratory complications (all, p <0.05). No significant differences were found for in-hospital mortality, cardiac, genitourinary, and vascular complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Performance of RARC has significantly increased in recent years. RARC appears safe and feasible for select patients. Earlier discharge and lower complications were noted for those undergoing RARC across different hospital systems nationwide. Copyright by Polish Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; national inpatient sample; robotic cystectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33552567      PMCID: PMC7848836          DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cent European J Urol        ISSN: 2080-4806


INTRODUCTION

More than 80,000 cases of bladder cancer were diagnosed in 2017, and currently there are an estimated 540,000 bladder cancer survivors living in the United States (US) [1, 2, 3]. Most cases are diagnosed as non-muscle invasive disease and are amenable to less radical interventions. Unfortunately, 15% to 20% of patients progress to invasive disease requiring more aggressive treatment such as radical cystectomy (RC) [4, 5]. Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, RC remains associated with significant patient morbidity [6]. In an effort to improve outcomes, robot-assisted RC (RARC) has been adopted as an alternative to the open approach (ORC) particularly by academic, referral centers [7, 8]. Few prospective studies at high, volume centers have demonstrated similar perioperative outcomes between the two approaches [9, 10, 11]. To date, the adoption of RARC remains controversial as it has been criticized regarding the cost, lack of tactile feedback, and concern for inferior oncologic outcome. In this study, we sought to evaluate trends of RARC over the study period and to compare perioperative outcomes for RARC and ORC using a large, all-payer nationwide database.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data and study source

We utilized discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) which is available through the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [12]. The NIS is the largest all-payer inpatient care database, comprising 20% of all inpatient hospitalizations in the US [13]. Using International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-9) codes, patient who underwent RC for malignant neoplasm of the bladder (ICD-9-CM code 188.0–188.6, 188.8, 188.9) were captured from the years 2008 to 2014. Patients with metastatic disease or pure laparoscopy were excluded from analysis (i.e. ICD-9 197.0–197.8).

Outcome and variables

Patient characteristics included age, gender, race, urinary diversion, and insurance payer. Comorbidity was calculated using the Elixhauser comorbidity score [14]. Hospital characteristics included hospital status and teaching status. ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify post-operative complications [15]. In-hospital infections were grouped into 4 major groups for analytical purposes: urinary tract infection, surgical site infection (SSI), pneumonia, and sepsis. Inpatient complications were assessed as previously described and grouped into 5 major groups: cardiac, respiratory, genitourinary, wound, and vascular complications [16].

Statistical analyses

Demographic factors and clinical variables were compared between ORC and RARC. Comparisons were performed using the two-sample t test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to assess utilization of each approach over time. Logistic and log-linear regression accounting for hospital sample weights and sampling years were performed to analyze the outcomes. Adjustment for age, gender, race, comorbidity, teaching status, hospital volume, insurance status, and urinary diversion was performed. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Study cohort

Of 11,189 patients, 14% underwent RARC. There were no differences in age or race between the two groups. RARC was performed in more teaching hospitals, male patients, those with private insurance, and lower comorbidity score (all, p ≤0.01). RARC was also associated with higher rate of ileal conduit urinary diversion (p <0.01) (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of patient and hospital characteristics

VariablePatients, n (%)p-valueb
Open (n = 9630)Robotic (n = 1565)
Age, mean (SD)a68.40 ±0.13a68.01 ±0.270.16
Female1495 (15.49)196 (12.51)<0.01
Race White Black Othersn = 8,6197534 (87.39)434 (5.04)651 (7.58)n = 1,3581187 (87.30)74 (5.44)97 (7.25)0.71
Ileal conduit diversion8186 (85.12)1377 (87.95)<0.01
Elixhauser comorbidity scores <0 =0 1~4 ≥51992 (20.68)1173 (12.22)830 (8.59)5635 (58.51)404 (25.87)169 (10.84)130 (8.37)862 (54.92)<0.01
Insurance Medicare/Medicaid Private Others6407 (66.58)2783 (28.95)428 (4.46)1004 (64.19)504 (32.29)56 (3.52)0.01
Teaching hospital7564 (79.63)1360 (87.10)<0.01
Bed size Small Medium Large923 (9.26)1602 (17.16)6985 (73.57)267 (16.87)244 (15.88)1052 (67.26)<0.01

mean±standard error based on the hospital sampling weight;

derived from two-sample t test for age and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables

Bold values indicate statistical significance

Summary of patient and hospital characteristics mean±standard error based on the hospital sampling weight; derived from two-sample t test for age and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables Bold values indicate statistical significance

Trends in surgical approach

Performance of RARC steadily increased over the study period. A significant increase was noted after 2011 with RARC being performed in 18.8% of cases versus 12.2% in the prior years (p <0.01) (Figure 1). The largest proportion was seen in 2014 with 22.8% of cases performed robotically. Length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and complication rate did not significantly change over time for each approach (not shown).
Figure 1

Proportion of robotic procedures over study period.

Proportion of robotic procedures over study period.

Outcomes

The weighted average LOS were 10.4 and 8.79 days for ORC and RARC, respectively (p <0.01). In the adjusted regression models, RARC was associated with decreased blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition, wound and respiratory complications (all, p ≤0.02). RARC was also associated with decreased risk of pneumonia and surgical site infection (SSI) (all, p ≤0.01). No significant differences were found for in-hospital mortality, cardiac, genitourinary, and vascular complications (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison in peri-operative outcomes of open and robotic cystectomy from 2008 to 2014

OutcomesPatients, n (%)ORc (95% CI; p-value)
Open (n = 9624)Robotic (n = 1565)UnadjustedAdjustedd
Length of stay, mean (SD)a10.40 ±0.128.79 ±0.180.85 (0.81, 0.89); p <0.00010.86 (0.82, 0.91); p <0.01
In-hospital mortality170 (1.77b)16 (1.02)0.58 (0.34, 0.98); p = 0.040.70 (0.40, 1.23); p = 0.21
Blood transfusion3359 (34.79)314 (19.98)0.47 (0.39, 0.57); p <0.00010.46 (0.37, 0.57); p <0.01
Parental nutrition982 (10.23)115 (7.34)0.70 (0.56, 0.86); p = 0.0010.77 (0.62, 0.97); p = 0.02
Complications Surgical site infection Pneumonia Sepsis Cardiac Respiratory Genitourinary Wound Vascular575 (5.97)449 (4.66)446 (4.64)513 (5.33)770 (8.03)1390 (14.49)1744 (18.14)671 (6.97)182 (1.89)68 (4.38)46 (2.95)46 (2.90)58 (3.72)113 (7.22)157 (9.96)255 (16.26)76 (4.83)25 (1.62)0.72 (0.56, 0.93); p = 0.010.62 (0.46, 0.84); p <0.010.61 (0.45, 0.83); p <0.010.69 (0.52, 0.91); p <0.010.89 (0.73, 1.09); p = 0.270.65 (0.55, 0.78); p <0.00010.88 (0.75, 1.02); p = 0.090.69 (0.53, 0.87); p <0.010.85 (0.54, 1.33); p = 0.480.79 (0.60, 1.03); p = 0.080.61 (0.44, 0.86); p <0.010.66 (0.47, 0.92); p = 0.010.75 (0.57, 1.01); p >0.050.97 (0.77, 1.22); p = 0.780.69 (0.57, 0.83); p <0.010.90 (0.76, 1.06); p = 0.220.68 (0.51, 0.90); p <0.010.97 (0.60, 1.55); p = 0.89

weighted average based on the hospital sampling weights;

weighted percentage based on the hospital sampling weights;

derived from logistic regression for binary outcomes and from log-normal regression for length of stay after accounting for hospital sample weights and sampling years;

adjusted for age, gender, race, Elixhauser comorbidity score, teaching status, insurance status, hospital size, and urinary diversion

Bold values indicate statistical significance

Comparison in peri-operative outcomes of open and robotic cystectomy from 2008 to 2014 weighted average based on the hospital sampling weights; weighted percentage based on the hospital sampling weights; derived from logistic regression for binary outcomes and from log-normal regression for length of stay after accounting for hospital sample weights and sampling years; adjusted for age, gender, race, Elixhauser comorbidity score, teaching status, insurance status, hospital size, and urinary diversion Bold values indicate statistical significance

DISCUSSION

Because of its complexity, RC has been performed in an open approach for decades. In an attempt to improve perioperative outcomes, RARC has been increasingly performed over time thanks to efforts from academic centers demonstrating the minimally-invasive feasibility of this procedure. Recently, a multicenter study showed no differences in perioperative complications among high-volume academic programs [17]. Our current study shows the steady increased adoption of the robotic platform in community hospitals for a complex urological procedure as well its association with acceptable perioperative outcomes. Our findings add generalizable, contemporary data on the rise and robotic feasibility of a major urologic surgery across several hospital settings in the US. A previous study by Leow et al. showed performance of RARC had increased from 0.6% in 2004 to 12.8% in 2010 [18]. Our findings corroborate this upward trend with the proportion of RARC increasing to a remarkable 22.8% in 2014. This is the highest reported rate of RARC nationwide and highlights the increased investment with robotic technologies for a traditionally-morbid operation. RC has long been associated with considerable postoperative morbidity, including major and minor complications ranging from 13 to 67% [19, 20, 21]. Bochner et al. performed a single institution, prospective study comparing ORC and RARC. The study was closed when an interim analysis showed no difference in the Clavien grade 2 to 5 complications [9]. In terms of oncologic outcomes, the recent RAZOR trial showed equivalent 2-year progression-free survival between robotic and open RC (71.6 versus 72.3%, respectively) [17]. However, these outcomes could be more a reflection of skill and experience of high-volume surgical team and hospital care rather than the technology itself. Examining nationwide perioperative outcomes, RARC was associated with decreased select complications. Although difficult to compare retrospective registries due to variance in patient population as well as collection and interpretation of data, our adjusted analysis did show RARC associated with lower respiratory and wound complications as well as a decreased risk of infections such as pneumonia and SSI. In addition, RARC patients had less transfusions, parenteral nutrition rates, and decreased LOS. The results are important in regards to health-system costs, as well as a potential benefit of decreased patient convalescence which could be associated with an earlier return to work. Although we were unable to compare high vs. low-grade complications, our results showed equivalent in-hospital mortality regardless of approach and speaks to the complexity of the procedure and the need for comprehensive care for these patients. Although this is a large, contemporary analysis of RARC versus ORC, there are limitations that cannot be overcome. Since this is a retrospective registry-derived study, there is no direct insight into patients’ or physicians’ preferences in decision-making regarding approach. Also, we were unable to compare pathological characteristics for either procedures which is an inherent limitation of this dataset. However, our study uses a large, inpatient database which makes our results generalizable with real-life experience on the increased utilization of the robotic platform for a major urological procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of RARC has continued to increase over time. RARC appears safe and feasible for select patients. Earlier discharge and lower complications were noted for those undergoing RARC across different hospital systems nationwide. Clinical practice points There has been a significant increase in robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) across community hospitals in the United States Shorter length-of-stay and fewer complications were noted with RARC More studies are needed to evaluate the effect of RARC on improving perioperative morbidity

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  18 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Dipen J Parekh; Jamie Messer; John Fitzgerald; Barbara Ercole; Robert Svatek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Radical cystectomy: open vs robotic approach.

Authors:  Clayton Stephen Lau; Robert H Blackwell; Marcus L Quek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Complications of radical cystectomy for nonmuscle invasive disease: comparison with muscle invasive disease.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; Nancy Wells; Dipen J Parekh; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A randomized trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner; Daniel D Sjoberg; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Primary superficial bladder cancer risk groups according to progression, mortality and recurrence.

Authors:  F Millán-Rodríguez; G Chéchile-Toniolo; J Salvador-Bayarri; J Palou; F Algaba; J Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Analysis of early complications after radical cystectomy: results of a collaborative care pathway.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Roxelyn G Baumgartner; Nancy Wells; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparative analysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hua-yin Yu; Nathanael D Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Keith J Kowalczyk; Paul L Nguyen; Toni K Choueiri; Adam S Kibel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.

Authors:  Jeff Nix; Angela Smith; Raj Kurpad; Matthew E Nielsen; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.