Literature DB >> 33552468

Increase of sentinel lymph node melanoma staging in The Netherlands: still room and need for further improvement.

Harmanjit Singh1, Anjelli Wignakumar1, Georgina J Williams2, Shima Jamshidi3, Daniel P Butler2, Simon H Wood2, Navid Jallali2, Jonathan A Dunne2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjuvant therapy; melanoma; sentinel node

Year:  2020        PMID: 33552468      PMCID: PMC7849948          DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2020-0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Manag        ISSN: 2045-0885


× No keyword cloud information.
Letter in response to: Deckers EA, Louwman MWJ, Kruijff S, Hoekstra HJ. Increase of sentinel lymph node melanoma staging in The Netherlands; still room and need for further improvement. Melanoma Manag. 7(1), MMT38 (2020). We read with interest the article by Deckers et al. [1] regarding increased uptake of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma in the Netherlands, which reflects our experience in the UK. Their study encompasses the years 2010–2016 including a large patient cohort, and during this time SLNB was used primarily as a staging tool for melanoma. While differing clinical guidelines were utilized during this period, the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guided who SLNB was primarily offered to, and included tumors which were T1b, constituting a Breslow thickness of ≤1 mm with ulceration or mitoses (≥1/mm2) or T2 or greater (>1 mm Breslow thickness). We reviewed all patients presenting with a new diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma to Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust in London between 1 November 2016 and 31 October 2018. At this time, we offered SLNB for melanomas ≥1 mm Breslow thickness in accordance with guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which differed marginally to the T1b definition [2]. Patients with regional or distant metastases at presentation were excluded. One hundred and twenty one patients had a new diagnosis of melanoma, of whom 84 (69%) were eligible for SLNB with a melanoma ≥1 mm Breslow thickness. Thirty nine of the 84 patients (46%) had SLNB, of whom nine were positive (23%). This data identified that our SLNB service may double with increased patient uptake, and could mirror the experience in the Netherlands with an increase year on year. At the end of 2017, adjuvant oncological therapy with Dabrafenib and Tramatenib demonstrated promising results for improved survival following a positive SLNB in BRAF-mutant melanoma [3]. In addition, immunotherapy evolved at a similar time and also demonstrated improved survival [4]. Patient entry for stage III adjuvant therapy trials was primarily those with AJCC 7th edition stage IIIB or C disease, or IIIA with a sentinel lymph node metastatic deposit of 1 mm or greater. In conjunction with MSLT-2 reporting that completion lymphadenectomy following a positive SLNB did not confer a survival benefit [5], adjuvant oncological therapy became the standard of care, and identifying patients with a positive SLNB has assumed greater importance to improve survival. Our initial study identified that more than half of patients declined SLNB at a time when adjuvant oncological therapy was not offered. The 8th edition of the AJCC guidelines subsequently lowered the threshold for T1b tumors from 0.8 to 1.0 mm Breslow thickness without ulceration. In our initial study, that would have made a further 12 patients (10%) eligible for SLNB if that was used as criteria for offering SLNB. In view of lowering the threshold to meet T1b tumor criteria, and the availability of life-prolonging treatment for stage 3 disease, we reviewed our SLNB patient uptake between 1 May 2019 and 30 April 2020. At this time, we offered SLNB for T1b tumors and above. Of 72 patients presenting with a new cutaneous melanoma, 40 were eligible for SLNB (55%), and of these, 35 proceeded (88%). Six patients (8%) were in the new T1b category and responsible for a small amount of the increased uptake, while acceptance of SLNB was comparable across AJCC tumor categories. Of four patients with a positive sentinel node, all had a deposit of 1 mm or greater. Our service has increased the referrals it receives for cutaneous melanoma over the past 4 years and doubled the numbers of SLNB it is performing. This is reflective of thorough patient counseling to include adjuvant treatment options, which have improved overall survival in melanoma. It has necessitated greater input from nuclear medicine and radiology for SPECT-CT imaging to improve accuracy for head and neck and truncal melanomas, with addition of a further consultant plastic surgeon and increased theater time. The incidence of melanoma is predicted to continue to rise in the UK [6], and SLNB services should anticipate further expansion of services to meet clinical need. The opinions expressed in this Letter to the Editor are those of the interviewee and do not necessarily reflect the views of Future Medicine Ltd.
  5 in total

1.  The Growing Burden of Invasive Melanoma: Projections of Incidence Rates and Numbers of New Cases in Six Susceptible Populations through 2031.

Authors:  David C Whiteman; Adele C Green; Catherine M Olsen
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma.

Authors:  Mark B Faries; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Robert H Andtbacka; Nicola Mozzillo; Jonathan S Zager; Tiina Jahkola; Tawnya L Bowles; Alessandro Testori; Peter D Beitsch; Harald J Hoekstra; Marc Moncrieff; Christian Ingvar; Michel W J M Wouters; Michael S Sabel; Edward A Levine; Doreen Agnese; Michael Henderson; Reinhard Dummer; Carlo R Rossi; Rogerio I Neves; Steven D Trocha; Frances Wright; David R Byrd; Maurice Matter; Eddy Hsueh; Alastair MacKenzie-Ross; Douglas B Johnson; Patrick Terheyden; Adam C Berger; Tara L Huston; Jeffrey D Wayne; B Mark Smithers; Heather B Neuman; Schlomo Schneebaum; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Charlotte E Ariyan; Darius C Desai; Lisa Jacobs; Kelly M McMasters; Anja Gesierich; Peter Hersey; Steven D Bines; John M Kane; Richard J Barth; Gregory McKinnon; Jeffrey M Farma; Erwin Schultz; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Richard A Hoefer; James M Lewis; Randall Scheri; Mark C Kelley; Omgo E Nieweg; R Dirk Noyes; Dave S B Hoon; He-Jing Wang; David A Elashoff; Robert M Elashoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Prolonged Survival in Stage III Melanoma with Ipilimumab Adjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Alexander M M Eggermont; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Jean-Jacques Grob; Reinhard Dummer; Jedd D Wolchok; Henrik Schmidt; Omid Hamid; Caroline Robert; Paolo A Ascierto; Jon M Richards; Céleste Lebbé; Virginia Ferraresi; Michael Smylie; Jeffrey S Weber; Michele Maio; Lars Bastholt; Laurent Mortier; Luc Thomas; Saad Tahir; Axel Hauschild; Jessica C Hassel; F Stephen Hodi; Corina Taitt; Veerle de Pril; Gaetan de Schaetzen; Stefan Suciu; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma.

Authors:  Georgina V Long; Axel Hauschild; Mario Santinami; Victoria Atkinson; Mario Mandalà; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; James Larkin; Marta Nyakas; Caroline Dutriaux; Andrew Haydon; Caroline Robert; Laurent Mortier; Jacob Schachter; Dirk Schadendorf; Thierry Lesimple; Ruth Plummer; Ran Ji; Pingkuan Zhang; Bijoyesh Mookerjee; Jeff Legos; Richard Kefford; Reinhard Dummer; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Increase of sentinel lymph node melanoma staging in The Netherlands; still room and need for further improvement.

Authors:  Eric A Deckers; Marieke Wj Louwman; Schelto Kruijff; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2020-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.