Literature DB >> 33551949

Evaluation of Changes in Preoperative Cortical Excitability by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Brain Tumor.

Iuri Santana Neville1,2,3, Alexandra Gomes Dos Santos2, Cesar Cimonari Almeida2,3, Cintya Yukie Hayashi2,3, Davi Jorge Fontoura Solla2, Ricardo Galhardoni2,3,4, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade1,2,3, Andre Russowsky Brunoni3, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira2, Wellingson Silva Paiva2,3.   

Abstract

Background: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the cortical excitability (CE) of patients with brain tumors surrounding or directly involving the corticospinal tract (CST) using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS).
Methods: We recruited 40 patients with a single brain tumor surrounding or directly involving the CST as well as 82 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The patients underwent standard nTMS and CE evaluations. Single and paired pulses were applied to the primary motor area (M1) of both affected and unaffected cerebral hemispheres 1 week before surgery. The CE parameters included resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) ratio for 140 and 120% stimulus (MEP 140/120 ratio), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Motor outcome was evaluated on hospital discharge and on 30-day and 90-day postoperative follow-up.
Results: In the affected hemispheres of patients, SICI and ICF were significantly higher than in the unaffected hemispheres (p=0.002 and p =0.009, respectively). The 140/120 MEP ratio of patients' unaffected hemispheres was lower than that in controls (p=0.001). Patients with glioblastomas (GBM) had a higher interhemispheric RMT ratio than patients with grade II and III gliomas ( p = 0.018). A weak correlation was observed among the RMT ratio and the preoperative motor score (R 2 = 0.118, p = 0.017) and the 90-day follow-up ( R 2 = 0.227, p = 0.016).
Conclusion: Using preoperative nTMS, we found that brain hemispheres affected by tumors had abnormal CE and that patients with GBM had a distinct pattern of CE. These findings suggest that tumor biological behavior might play a role in CE changes.
Copyright © 2021 Neville, Gomes dos Santos, Almeida, Hayashi, Solla, Galhardoni, de Andrade, Brunoni, Teixeira and Paiva.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain tumor; cortical excitability; glioblastoma; motor outcome; neuromodulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551949      PMCID: PMC7863982          DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.582262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurol        ISSN: 1664-2295            Impact factor:   4.003


  40 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Accelerated TMS for Depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Irem Sonmez; Deniz Doruk Camsari; Aiswarya L Nandakumar; Jennifer L Vande Voort; Simon Kung; Charles P Lewis; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 4.  Intrinsic synaptic organization of the motor cortex.

Authors:  A Keller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on cortical excitability in humans: A TMS-EMG and TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Darmani; Til O Bergmann; Carl Zipser; David Baur; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle N McDonnell; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Risk stratification in motor area-related glioma surgery based on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation data.

Authors:  Tizian Rosenstock; Ulrike Grittner; Güliz Acker; Vera Schwarzer; Nataliia Kulchytska; Peter Vajkoczy; Thomas Picht
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy.

Authors:  Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga; Martina Grim-Stieger; Martin Posch; Othmar Schuhfried; Gerda Vacariu; Christian Mittermaier; Christian Bittner; Veronika Fialka-Moser
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of sensorimotor networks in Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Orth; Alexander Münchau
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Repetitive TMS does not improve cognition in patients with TBI: A randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  Iuri Santana Neville; Ana Luiza Zaninotto; Cintya Yukie Hayashi; Priscila Aparecida Rodrigues; Ricardo Galhardoni; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Robson L Oliveira Amorim; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Capabilities of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to Aid in the Removal of Brain Tumors Affecting the Motor Cortex: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucas Jose Vaz Schiavao; Iuri Neville Ribeiro; Cintya Yukie Hayashi; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Gabriel Pokorny; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.