Literature DB >> 33551925

Does the League Table Lie? The Development and Validation of the Perceived Performance in Team Sports Questionnaire (PPTSQ).

Lael Gershgoren1, Asaf Blatt1, Tal Sela2, Gershon Tenenbaum3,4.   

Abstract

Objective performance measures are vastly used in sport psychology despite their inherent limitations (e.g., unaccounted baseline differences). Founded on the nature of group goals in team sports, we aimed at developing the Perceived Performance in Team Sports Questionnaire (PPTSQ) to capture the team members' perception of their team's performance. Accordingly, three dimensions were hypothesized: effort investment, skills execution, and perceived outcome. To measure these dimensions, items were generated to address the players' perception of their team performance as a whole. Four samples of athletes were used to test the psychometric properties of the PPTSQ: professional (n = 231), collegiate (n = 222), professional-retest (n = 89), and mixed professional-collegiate (n = 139). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to estimate construct and content validities. These procedures revealed a better data fit to a two-dimensional model that consists of effort investment and perceived outcome. The reliability analyses for the PPTSQ provide satisfactory evidence that the questionnaire is a reliable measure of perceived performance in team sport. Adequate internal consistency emerged for both dimensions (0.75 < ω < 0.89). Furthermore, a high correlation was obtained for temporal stability. Concurrent validity was addressed by correlating the PPTSQ scores with the Group Environment Questionnaire and the Team Assessment Diagnostic Instrument. Correlational analysis between the PPTSQ and an objective measure of performance was used to test its predictive validity. The correlations strongly support the concurrent and predictive validities of the PPTSQ. We conclude that our perceived performance questionnaire can address various objective measures shortcomings (e.g., considering base-rate biases) resulting in a more meaningful team performance metric. Implication of the PPTSQ for sport psychology research and applied work enhancement are discussed in detail.
Copyright © 2021 Gershgoren, Blatt, Sela and Tenenbaum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  base-rate bias; effort; objective outcome; perceived performance; sport psychology; team operation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551925      PMCID: PMC7859492          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.615018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  7 in total

1.  Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams.

Authors:  P C Rasker; W M Post; J M Schraagen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  S E Moritz; D L Feltz; K R Fahrbach; D E Mack
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Path analysis of self-efficacy and diving performance revisited.

Authors:  Deborah L Feltz; Graig M Chow; Teri J Hepler
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.016

4.  Stressors, academic performance, and learned resourcefulness in baccalaureate nursing students.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Goff
Journal:  Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh       Date:  2011-01-24

5.  Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Wes E Bonifay; Mark G Haviland
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2012-10-02

6.  When less is more: counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists.

Authors:  V H Medvec; S F Madey; T Gilovich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-10

7.  Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.

Authors:  Italo Trizano-Hermosilla; Jesús M Alvarado
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.