Literature DB >> 33551687

Diurnal Variation in Visual Simple Reaction Time between and within Genders in Young Adults: An Exploratory, Comparative, Pilot Study.

Hanumantha S1, Ashwin Kamath2, Rajeshwari Shastry2.   

Abstract

Simple reaction time (SRT) is the minimum time required to respond to a stimulus; it is a measure of processing speed. Our study aimed to determine the variation in visual SRT with time among individuals of the same gender and between genders. We carried out a prospective, parallel group, pilot study involving ten male and ten female medical students aged 18-25 years. After obtaining written informed consent, the participants were familiarized with the procedures, and each completed a single practice session of a computerized visual SRT which was administered using Psychology Experiment Building Language Version 2.0 software. On a predetermined day, the participants completed the exercise at 10 a.m., 1 p.m., and 5 p.m. The results showed no statistically significant difference in SRT based on time of day between genders (χ 2(2) = 4.300, p=0.116) as well as within gender (males (χ 2(2) = 0.600, p=0.741); females (χ 2(2) = 5.000, p=0.082). Our study showed that visual SRT does not change significantly at different times of the day and within and between genders. Intraindividual variations in visual SRT can mask the presence of a small but significant difference; hence, further studies are warranted.
Copyright © 2021 Hanumantha S et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551687      PMCID: PMC7846399          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6695532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


  17 in total

1.  Searching night and day: a dissociation of effects of circadian phase and time awake on visual selective attention and vigilance.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Brian E Cade; Jeremy M Wolfe; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

2.  Age differences in fluid intelligence: contributions of general slowing and frontal decline.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Nancy A Zook; Edward L DeLosh; Deana B Davalos; Hasker P Davis
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Relationship between alertness, performance, and body temperature in humans.

Authors:  Kenneth P Wright; Joseph T Hull; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Validation of reaction time as a measure of cognitive function and quality of life in healthy subjects and patients.

Authors:  Lene H Jakobsen; Janice M Sorensen; Ingeborg K Rask; Birgitte S Jensen; Jens Kondrup
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.008

5.  The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Brian J Piper
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Sex differences in reaction time mean and intraindividual variability across the life span.

Authors:  Dominika Dykiert; Geoff Der; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05

7.  A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students.

Authors:  Aditya Jain; Ramta Bansal; Avnish Kumar; K D Singh
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2015 May-Aug

8.  The time course of corticospinal excitability during a simple reaction time task.

Authors:  Michael Kennefick; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Female vs. Male Ampelmännchen-Gender-Specific Reaction Times to Male and Female Traffic Light Figures.

Authors:  Farid I Kandil; Bettina Olk; Claus C Hilgetag
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 10.  Circadian Rhythms in Attention.

Authors:  Pablo Valdez
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.