| Literature DB >> 33551605 |
Srividhya Srinivasan1, Senthil Kumar Kumarappan1, Anupama Ramachandran1, Manjiri Nagesh Honap1, Sadasiva Kadandale1, Sreeram Rayar1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The success in endodontic therapy is dependent largely on the absolute elimination of pulp tissue remnants and the maximum reduction of pathologic microbial load present within the root canal system. AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare and evaluate the ability of pulp tissue dissolution with and without activation of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).Entities:
Keywords: Irrigant activation; laser-assisted irrigation; photodynamic therapy; pulp dissolution; sodium hypochlorite
Year: 2020 PMID: 33551605 PMCID: PMC7861078 DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_425_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Conserv Dent ISSN: 0972-0707
One-way ANOVA showing comparison of mean residual weight loss (in mg) of pulp tissue for various groups
| Groups | Activation methods | Mean±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | NaOCl with no activation – Control | 0.57±0.09 | 16.14 | 0.000* |
| Group II | Manual agitation with warm NaOCl | 0.65±0.33 | ||
| Group III | Ultrasonic activated NaOCl | 0.7±0.33 | ||
| Group IV | Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl | 0.6±0.21 | ||
| Group V | Erbium laser-activated NaOCl | 1.7±0.08 |
*Statistically significant P<0.05. SD: Standard deviation, NaOCl: Sodium Hypochlorite
Intergroup comparison among various groups with Tukey post hoc test and P value associated with each comparison
| Group | Groups | |
|---|---|---|
| NaOCl without agitation (Group I) | Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) | 1.000 |
| Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) | 1.000 | |
| Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) | 1.000 | |
| Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group V) | 0.000* | |
| Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) | NaOCl without agitation (Group I) | 1.000 |
| Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) | 1.000 | |
| Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) | 1.000 | |
| Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group-V) | 0.000* | |
| Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) | NaOCl without agitation (Group I) | 1.000 |
| Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) | 1.000 | |
| Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) | 1.000 | |
| Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group IV) | 0.000* | |
| Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group-IV) | NaOCl without agitation (Group I) | 1.000 |
| Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) | 1.000 | |
| Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) | 1.000 | |
| Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group V) | 0.000* | |
| Erbium laser-activated NaOCl (Group-V) | NaOCl without agitation (Group I) | 0.000* |
| Manual agitation with warm NaOCl (Group II) | 0.000* | |
| Ultrasonic activated NaOCl (Group III) | 0.000* | |
| Photodynamically stimulated NaOCl (Group IV) | 0.000* |
*Statistically significant P<0.05. SD: Standard deviation, NaOCl: Sodium hypochlorite