Literature DB >> 33551345

Clinical Significance of Bone Marrow Blast Percentage in Patients With Myelofibrosis and the Effect of Ruxolitinib Therapy.

Lucia Masarova1, Prithviraj Bose2, Naveen Pemmaraju2, Naval Daver2, Lingsha Zhou2, Sherry Pierce2, Hagop Kantarjian2, Zeev Estrov2, Srdan Verstovsek2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of bone marrow (BM) blasts on the outcome of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is poorly understood, unless they are ≥ 10% and represent a more aggressive accelerated phase. Similarly, the role of the JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib (RUX), has not been assessed in correlation with BM blasts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Herein, we present clinical characteristics and outcomes of 1412 patients with MF stratified by BM blasts and therapy.
RESULTS: Seven percent and 4% of patients had 5% to 9% and ≥ 10% BM blasts, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients were treated with RUX throughout their disease course. Overall survival (OS) differed among patients with 0% to 1%, 2% to 4%, and 5% to 9% BM blasts, with median OS of 64, 48, and 22 months, respectively (P < .001). Patients with 5% to 9% BM blasts had similar OS as patients with ≥ 10% BM blasts (22 vs. 14 months; P = .73). All patients with < 10% blasts who were treated with RUX showed superior OS to patients who did not receive RUX.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients with MF with ≥ 5% BM blasts represent a high-risk group with adverse clinical characteristics and inferior outcome. However, they still appear to derive substantial survival benefit from therapy with RUX.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Prognosis; Progression; Relevance; Survival benefit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33551345      PMCID: PMC8849582          DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  19 in total

1.  Next-generation sequencing-based multigene mutational screening for acute myeloid leukemia using MiSeq: applicability for diagnostics and disease monitoring.

Authors:  Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Neelima G Reddy; Varan Haghshenas; Mark J Routbort; Michael A Harmon; Bedia A Barkoh; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Rajesh R Singh
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status.

Authors:  Naseema Gangat; Domenica Caramazza; Rakhee Vaidya; Geeta George; Kebede Begna; Susan Schwager; Daniel Van Dyke; Curtis Hanson; Wenting Wu; Animesh Pardanani; Francisco Cervantes; Francesco Passamonti; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment).

Authors:  Francesco Passamonti; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi; Enrica Morra; Elisa Rumi; Arturo Pereira; Paola Guglielmelli; Ester Pungolino; Marianna Caramella; Margherita Maffioli; Cristiana Pascutto; Mario Lazzarino; Mario Cazzola; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment.

Authors:  G Barosi; R A Mesa; J Thiele; F Cervantes; P J Campbell; S Verstovsek; B Dupriez; R L Levine; F Passamonti; J Gotlib; J T Reilly; A M Vannucchi; C A Hanson; L A Solberg; A Orazi; A Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Risk factors for leukemic transformation in patients with primary myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Jocelin Huang; Chin-Yang Li; Ruben A Mesa; Wentling Wu; Curtis A Hanson; Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prognostic model to identify patients with myelofibrosis at the highest risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Hagop Kantarjian; Sherry Pierce; Jorge Cortes; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2013-02-04

9.  Guideline for the diagnosis and management of myelofibrosis.

Authors:  John T Reilly; Mary Frances McMullin; Philip A Beer; Nauman Butt; Eibhlean Conneally; Andrew Duncombe; Anthony R Green; N George Michaeel; Marie H Gilleece; Georgina W Hall; Steven Knapper; Adam Mead; Ruben A Mesa; Mallika Sekhar; Bridget Wilkins; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael W N Deininger; Carole B Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth O Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Mark Jones; Deanna Kornacki; Kang Sun; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 17.388

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Omar A Shahin; Helen T Chifotides; Prithviraj Bose; Lucia Masarova; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.195

Review 2.  JAK2 inhibitor persistence in MPN: uncovering a central role of ERK activation.

Authors:  Garima Pandey; Andrew T Kuykendall; Gary W Reuther
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 3.  Towards a Personalized Definition of Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Barbara Mora; Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.213

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.