Literature DB >> 33550356

[Different anesthesia management in preterm infants undergoing surgeries for retinopathy of prematurity: A retrospective study].

Q F Zhang1, H Zhao1, Y Feng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different anesthesia management on clinical outcomes in former prematurely born infants undergoing surgeries for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
METHODS: In this retrospective study, electronic medical record database was searched for all former prematurely born infants (gestational age < 37 weeks and post conceptual age < 60 weeks) who received ROP surgery under inhalational general anesthesia between November 2016 and October 2018. The patients were divided into two groups based on anesthesia management: laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion without intravenous muscle relaxant injection and with pressure support ventilation (LMA group) or airway secured with endotracheal tube (ETT) with intravenous muscle relaxant injection and pressure controlled ventilation (ETT group). Primary outcomes included perioperative adverse events and complications. Extubation time and length of stay after surgery were also recorded.
RESULTS: Sixty eight preterm infants in the LMA group and 100 preterm infants in the ETT group were included. The incidence of adverse events during surgery (including airway management change and desaturation) was similar in LMA group and ETT group (4.4% vs. 1.0%, P =0.364). During the early recovery period after surgery, the incidence of difficult extubation (extubation time >30 min) was significantly lower in LMA group compared with ETT group (4.4% vs.15.0%, RR=0.262, 95%CI:0.073-0.942, P=0.029). The incidence of respiratory events was similar between the two groups (20.6% vs. 27.0%, P =0.342). However, the incidence of apnea was significantly lower in the LMA group than in the ETT group (5.9% vs.19.0%, RR=0.266, 95%CI: 0.086-0.822, P =0.015). No significant difference was observed between the LMA group and ETT group in incidences of cardiovascular events (0% vs. 1.0%, P =1.000) and unplanned admission to neonatal intensive care unit (5.9% vs. 7.0%, P=0.774). No airway spasm, re-intubation, aspiration or regurgitation was observed during early recovery. During late recovery after returning to ward, the incidence of adverse events was also similar between the two groups (0% vs. 2.0%, P =0.241). The median (IQR) extubation time was 6 (5, 10) min in LMA group and 10 (6, 19) min in ETT group (P < 0.001). The median length of stay after surgery was significantly shortened in LMA group compared with ETT group [20 (17, 22) hours vs. 22 (17, 68) hours, P =0.002].
CONCLUSION: Compared with endotracheal intubation with intravenous muscle relaxant injection, laryngeal mask airway insertion without muscle relaxant could achieve an early extubation, and reduce the incidence of apnea during early recovery period in former prematurely born infants undergoing ROP surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway management; Anesthesia management; Muscle relaxant; Pediatric anesthesia; Retinopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33550356      PMCID: PMC7867972     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  13 in total

1.  Rocuronium for nonemergent intubation of term and preterm infants.

Authors:  D M Feltman; M G Weiss; P Nicoski; J Sinacore
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Apnea after Awake Regional and General Anesthesia in Infants: The General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia Study--Comparing Apnea and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Davidson; Neil S Morton; Sarah J Arnup; Jurgen C de Graaff; Nicola Disma; Davinia E Withington; Geoff Frawley; Rodney W Hunt; Pollyanna Hardy; Magda Khotcholava; Britta S von Ungern Sternberg; Niall Wilton; Pietro Tuo; Ida Salvo; Gillian Ormond; Robyn Stargatt; Bruno Guido Locatelli; Mary Ellen McCann
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  The effect of endotracheal tubes versus laryngeal mask airways on perioperative respiratory adverse events in infants: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas F E Drake-Brockman; Anoop Ramgolam; Guicheng Zhang; Graham L Hall; Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  The neonatal lung--physiology and ventilation.

Authors:  Roland P Neumann; Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.556

5.  Intubating conditions and adverse events during sevoflurane induction in infants.

Authors:  J M Devys; G Mourissoux; F X Donnette; R Plat; F Schauvliège; P Le Bigot; P Dureau; B Plaud
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy.

Authors:  Aparna Sinha; Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  Postoperative apnea, bradycardia, and oxygen desaturation in formerly premature infants: prospective comparison of spinal and general anesthesia.

Authors:  E J Krane; C M Haberkern; L E Jacobson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Airway protection and the laryngeal mask airway in sinus and nasal surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Kaplan; Gregory J Crosby; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Supraglottic airway devices vs tracheal intubation in children: a quantitative meta-analysis of respiratory complications.

Authors:  Virginie Luce; Hakim Harkouk; Christopher Brasher; Daphné Michelet; Julie Hilly; Matthieu Maesani; Thierno Diallo; Nyamjargal Mangalsuren; Yves Nivoche; Souhayl Dahmani
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 10.  Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.

Authors:  Anne Greenough; Thomas E Rossor; Adesh Sundaresan; Vadivelam Murthy; Anthony D Milner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.