Literature DB >> 33550277

A novel methylation signature predicts inferior outcome of patients with PDAC.

Minqi Gu1, Jing Sun1, Shunhao Zhang1, Jing Chen1, Guihua Wang1,2, Shaoqing Ju1,2, Xudong Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will become the second most common cause of death in North America and Europe over the next 10 years owing to the lack of early diagnosis, poor treatment, and poor prognosis. This study evaluated the methylation array data of 184 patients with PDAC in The Cancer Genome Atlas database to explore methylation biomarkers related to patient outcome. Using Univariable Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression analysis method in the training dataset, it was found that the four DNA methylation markers (CCNT1, ITGB3, SDS, and HMOX2) were significantly correlated with the overall survival of patients with PDAC. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that these four DNA methylation markers could significantly distinguish high-risk and low-risk patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis further confirmed that the four DNA methylation markers had high sensitivity and specificity, which could predict the prognosis of patients. Moreover, there was a difference in the genetic mutations between high-risk and low-risk patients distinguished by the four-DNA methylation model, which can provide information for clinical treatment. Finally, compared with known biomarkers, the model was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of PDAC. This four-DNA methylation model has potential as a new independent prognostic indicator, and could be used for the diagnosis, monitoring, and precision medicine of pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; The Cancer Genome Atlas; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33550277      PMCID: PMC7880369          DOI: 10.18632/aging.202347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


  34 in total

1.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  N7 methylation alters hydrogen-bonding patterns of guanine in duplex DNA.

Authors:  Yi Kou; Myong-Chul Koag; Seongmin Lee
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  LncRNA-H19 regulates cell proliferation and invasion of ectopic endometrium by targeting ITGB3 via modulating miR-124-3p.

Authors:  Songping Liu; Junjun Qiu; Xiaoyan Tang; Hongyan Cui; Qiong Zhang; Quanliang Yang
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  DNA methylation of sarcosine dehydrogenase (SARDH) loci as a prognosticator for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mazdak; Hossein Tezval; Janne Carmen Callauch; Natalia Dubrowinskaja; Inga Peters; Carsten Bokemeyer; Jörg Hennenlotter; Arnulf Stenzl; Markus A Kuczyk; Jürgen Serth
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Genetic and epigenetic alterations in pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Yannick Delpu; Naïma Hanoun; Hubert Lulka; Flavie Sicard; Janick Selves; Louis Buscail; Jérôme Torrisani; Pierre Cordelier
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Exploring the FGFR3-related oncogenic mechanism in bladder cancer using bioinformatics strategy.

Authors:  Wei Cao; Enguang Ma; Li Zhou; Tan Yuan; Chunying Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  SRPX2 and RAB31 are effective prognostic biomarkers in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hao Li; Shi-Rong Zhang; Hua-Xiang Xu; Wen-Quan Wang; Shuo Li; Tian-Jiao Li; Quan-Xing Ni; Xian-Jun Yu; Liang Liu; Chun-Tao Wu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Three hypomethylated genes were associated with poor overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Huiming Chen; Yan Kong; Qing Yao; Xing Zhang; Yunong Fu; Jia Li; Chang Liu; Zheng Wang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Aberrant methylation of MUC1 and MUC4 promoters are potential prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Seiya Yokoyama; Michiyo Higashi; Sho Kitamoto; Monika Oeldorf; Uwe Knippschild; Marko Kornmann; Kosei Maemura; Hiroshi Kurahara; Edwin Wiest; Tomofumi Hamada; Ikumi Kitazono; Yuko Goto; Takashi Tasaki; Tsubasa Hiraki; Kazuhito Hatanaka; Yuko Mataki; Hiroki Taguchi; Shinichi Hashimoto; Surinder K Batra; Akihide Tanimoto; Suguru Yonezawa; Michael A Hollingsworth
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-05
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cell-Free DNA Methylation as Blood-Based Biomarkers for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma-A Literature Update.

Authors:  Stine Dam Henriksen; Ole Thorlacius-Ussing
Journal:  Epigenomes       Date:  2021-04-09

2.  Development and Validation of a 7-Gene Prognostic Signature to Improve Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zengyu Feng; Hao Qian; Kexian Li; Jianyao Lou; Yulian Wu; Chenghong Peng
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Development and validation of prognostic and diagnostic model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on scRNA-seq and bulk-seq datasets.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xinxin Liu; Weikang Liu; Feng Wang; Xiaodong Tian; Yinmo Yang
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.121

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.