| Literature DB >> 33550167 |
Jian Shen1, Chuanyang Liu1, Qing Lv2, Junqiang Gu2, Mingyu Su2, Shifeng Wang3, Yidi Chai4, Cheng Cheng4, Jing Wu5.
Abstract
In 2020, a sudden COVID-19 pandemic unprecedentedly weakened anthropogenic activities and as results minified the pollution discharge to aquatic environment. In this study, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on aquatic environment of the southern Jiangsu (SJ) segment of Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal (SJ-BHGC) were explored. Fluorescent component similarity and high-performance size exclusion chromatography analyses indicated that the textile printing and dyeing wastewater might be one of the main pollution sources in SJ-BHGC. The water quality parameters and intensities of fluorescent components (WT-C1(20) and WT-C2(20)) decreased to low level due to the collective shutdown of all industries in SJ region during the Spring Festival holiday and the outbreak of the domestic COVID-19 pandemic in China (January 24th to late February, 2020). Then, they presented a gradual upward trend after the domestic epidemic was under control. In mid-March, the outbreak of the international COVID-19 pandemic hit the garment export trade of China and consequently inhibited the production activities of textile printing and dyeing industry (TPDI) in SJ region. After peaking on March 26th, the intensities of WT-C1(20) and WT-C2(20) decreased again with changed intensity ratio until April 12th. During the study period (135 days), correlation analysis revealed that WT-C1 and WT-C2 possessed homology and their fluorescence intensities were highly positively correlated with conductivity and CODMn. With fluorescence fingerprint (FF) technique, this study not only excavated the characteristics and pollution causes of water body in SJ-BHGC, but also provided novel insights into impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on production activities of TPDI and aquatic environment of SJ-BHGC. The results of this study indicated that FF technique was an effective tool for precise supervision of water environment.Entities:
Keywords: Aquatic environment; COVID-19; Fluorescence fingerprint; Variation; Water quality parameter
Year: 2021 PMID: 33550167 PMCID: PMC7830270 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Res ISSN: 0043-1354 Impact factor: 11.236
Fig. 1The contour plots and Ex/Em loadings of three individual fluorescent components decomposed from water samples along the SJ-BHGC.
Spectral similarities between different fluorescent components.
| TPDW-C1 | TPDW-C2 | BS-C1 | BS-C2 | BS-C3 | WT-C1(19) | WT-C2(19) | WT-C3(19) | WT-C1(20) | WT-C2(20) | WT-C3(20) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPDW-C1 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.43 | 0.11 | |||
| TPDW-C2 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.23 | ||||
| BS-C1 | 1.00 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.05 | ||||
| BS-C2 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.27 | |||||
| BS-C3 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.03 | 0.17 | ||||||
| WT-C1(19) | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.05 | ||||||
| WT-C2(19) | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.23 | |||||||
| WT-C3(19) | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.17 | ||||||||
| WT-C1(20) | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.05 | ||||||||
| WT-C2(20) | 1.00 | 0.20 | |||||||||
| WT-C3(20) | 1.00 |
Fig. 2HPSEC chromatograms with specific Ex/Em wavelength pairs for water body in SJ-BHGC, TPDW from different plants, and Dispersant MF.
Fig. 3The WQP variations of water body in WT section from January 1st to May 15th, 2019. (A) Turbidity; (B) Conductivity; (C) CODMn; (D) NH3-N; (E) TN; (F) TP
Fig. 4The WQPs variations of water body in WT section from January 1st to May 15th, 2020. (A) Turbidity; (B) Conductivity; (C) CODMn; (D) NH3-N; (E) TN; (F) TP
Fig. 5The contour plots and Ex/Em loadings of three individual fluorescent components decomposed from water samples of WT section in 2019 and 2020.
Fig. 6The Fmax variations of three fluorescent components of water body in WT section from January 1st to May 15th in 2019 and 2020.
Fig. 7The correlations between Fmax and WQPs of water body in WT section.