Marco Meloni1, Silvia Acquati2, Carmelo Licciardello3, Ornella Ludovico4, Mario Sepe5, Cristiana Vermigli6, Roberto Da Ros7. 1. Diabetic Foot Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy. Electronic address: meloni.marco@libero.it. 2. Unit of Endocrinology, Pierantoni-Morgagni Hospital, Forlì AUSL Romagna, Italy. 3. UFC Malattie disendocrine e dismetaboliche, Centro Catanese di Medicina e Chirurgia, Catania, Italy. 4. Unit of Endocrinology, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. 5. Posturology Centre, Salerno, Italy. 6. Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetic Foot Centre, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy. 7. Ssd Diabetologia, Monfalcone Gorizia Asugi, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetic foot (DF) disease is a current health and social burden. The authors aimed to identify the barriers to the DF management across Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A questionnaire was submitted to Italian centres dedicated to DF care. The questionnaire was composed of 12 questions focused on the barriers to the DF management including timing of referral, hospital management, and community follow-up. Each centre could answer by choosing a score from 1 to 5 for every item with the following numerical variables: 1 = never; 2 = rarely; 3 = sometimes; 4 = often; 5 = always. Accordingly, for each item a national and regional score was reported and a comparison between regions was carried out. National and regional scores were estimated using the total score for each item as a numerator and the number of national centres included as a denominator. Among 102 centres, 99 were included and 3 were excluded due to missing data. The 99 centres belonged to 16 regions with the following distribution: Calabria 4, Campania 5, Emilia-Romagna 14, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia 4, Lazio 12, Liguria 4, Lombardy 10, Marche 1, Molise 1, Piedmont 5, Apulia 5, Sardinia 5, Sicily 4, Tuscany 11, Veneto 9, Umbria 5. The items with the highest score were late referral (3.3) and urgent surgery (3.2). The regions with the highest score were Molise (3.9) and Calabria (3.5). CONCLUSION: The main issues across Italy were late referral and the requirement for urgent surgery for acute DF. In the regional scenario, the southern central areas showed more barriers than northern regions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetic foot (DF) disease is a current health and social burden. The authors aimed to identify the barriers to the DF management across Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A questionnaire was submitted to Italian centres dedicated to DF care. The questionnaire was composed of 12 questions focused on the barriers to the DF management including timing of referral, hospital management, and community follow-up. Each centre could answer by choosing a score from 1 to 5 for every item with the following numerical variables: 1 = never; 2 = rarely; 3 = sometimes; 4 = often; 5 = always. Accordingly, for each item a national and regional score was reported and a comparison between regions was carried out. National and regional scores were estimated using the total score for each item as a numerator and the number of national centres included as a denominator. Among 102 centres, 99 were included and 3 were excluded due to missing data. The 99 centres belonged to 16 regions with the following distribution: Calabria 4, Campania 5, Emilia-Romagna 14, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia 4, Lazio 12, Liguria 4, Lombardy 10, Marche 1, Molise 1, Piedmont 5, Apulia 5, Sardinia 5, Sicily 4, Tuscany 11, Veneto 9, Umbria 5. The items with the highest score were late referral (3.3) and urgent surgery (3.2). The regions with the highest score were Molise (3.9) and Calabria (3.5). CONCLUSION: The main issues across Italy were late referral and the requirement for urgent surgery for acute DF. In the regional scenario, the southern central areas showed more barriers than northern regions.