Literature DB >> 33548251

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic marker of triple-negative breast cancer in older women.

Naoko Honma1, Hideaki Ogata2, Akimitsu Yamada3, Yoko Matsuda4, Keiichi Kontani5, Mika Miyashita6, Tomio Arai7, Eiichi Sasaki8, Kazutoshi Shibuya9, Tetuo Mikami10, Masataka Sawaki11.   

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks an effective treatment target and is usually treated with chemotherapy. Treatment of older patients with TNBC, however, should be decided carefully because of the side effects of chemotherapy in this population. Some forms of TNBC are associated with a favorable prognosis and do not require chemotherapy. To optimize the treatment of older patients with TNBC, it is important to know the clinicopathological characteristics and a prognostic marker. In this study, classic clinicopathological factors, immunohistochemical characteristics (androgen receptor [AR], cytokeratin 5/6 [CK5/6], epidermal growth factor receptor), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the clinical outcome based on the status of each biomarker were compared among a consecutive series of female patients with TNBC aged ≥75 years (n = 75) and among those aged 55-64 years matched for the pathological stage (n = 47) who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. TNBC with special histology (particularly apocrine carcinoma, pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma, and metaplastic carcinoma) was more frequent in the older group than in the younger group (35/75, 57% versus 11/47, 23%, P = 0.010). The AR positivity rate was higher in older patients than in younger patients, whereas TILs and CK5/6 exhibited the opposite results. In multivariate analyses, AR positivity was an independent predictor of a favorable outcome in older patients (lower recurrence rate), whereas the high level of TILs was favorable in younger patients (lower recurrence and mortality rates). AR positivity or apocrine morphology was frequent and predicts a favorable clinical outcome in older patients with TNBC, suggesting the importance of AR examination in this population.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apocrine carcinoma; Basal marker; Metaplastic carcinoma; Older; Squamous cell carcinoma; Triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 33548251     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  3 in total

Review 1.  Luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype of triple-negative breast cancer: molecular, morphological, and clinical features.

Authors:  Sergey Vtorushin; Anastasia Dulesova; Nadezhda Krakhmal
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.552

2.  Partial Response After Toripalimab Plus Anlotinib for Advanced Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yang Fu; Jie Liu; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 3.  Carcinogenesis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Sex Steroid Hormones.

Authors:  Naoko Honma; Yoko Matsuda; Tetuo Mikami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.