Literature DB >> 33548220

Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers and the Risk of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Sean R Mendez1, Rachel C Frank2, Elizabeth K Stevenson3, Mabel Chung4, Michael G Silverman5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33548220      PMCID: PMC7857077          DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: / mismatch and the loss of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 respiratory distress. , Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), frequently prescribed first-line antihypertensive agents, have the potential to disrupt hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and worsen V̇/Q̇ mismatch that leads to profound hypoxemia in patients with pulmonary disease. We hypothesized that CCBs would be associated with worse respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

Among 444 consecutively hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 (admitted between March 13 and April 7, 2020, at a quaternary referral center and an affiliated community hospital in Massachusetts), 245 patients had hypertension and were included in the analysis. Data elements were abstracted retrospectively from the electronic health record by trained study personnel who followed standardized protocol. The study was approved by the Partners Healthcare Institutional Review Board with a waiver of informed consent. Dihydropyridine CCB exposure status was based on confirmed home medication list at the time of hospital admission. The primary end point was a composite of intubation or death modeled as a time-to-event analysis. For patients who died after intubation, the time of intubation was considered time of primary end point as with previous studies. Cox models were used to evaluate the association between CCBs and the primary end point. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease, asthma/COPD, peripheral arterial disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and the following medications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, thiazide diuretic, loop diuretic, beta blocker, aspirin, and statin. To further account for potential confounding, an additional analysis was performed with propensity score matching. The propensity score for CCB use was estimated with a logistic regression model that incorporated the same covariates used in the multivariable Cox model.

Results

Of the 245 individuals with hypertension included in our analysis, 70 (29%) were taking CCBs, and 175 (71%) were not. Baseline characteristics according to CCB use are shown in Table 1 for both the unmatched and matched samples. The propensity score matched cohort consisted of 116 individuals; 58 exposed to CCBs and 58 who were not. In both the matched and unmatched samples, slightly less than one-half the cohort was female, and nearly 50% of the cohort was non-white. Average time from symptom onset to hospital presentation was 7 ± 5 days. At the time of hospital presentation, patients who had been taking CCBs were more likely to have an oxygen saturation <90% (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics Stratified by Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Exposure

VariableUnmatched Patients
Matched Patients
No Calcium Channel Blocker (n = 175)Calcium Channel Blocker (n = 70)Standardized DifferenceNo Calcium Channel Blocker (n = 58)Calcium Channel Blocker (n = 58)Standardized Difference
Baseline demographics
 Age, mean ± SD, y70 ± 1470 ± 150.0173 ± 1270 ± 160.20
 Female, No. (%)85 (49)28 (40)0.1728 (48)25 (43)0.10
 BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m230 ± 730 ± 60.0830 ± 730 ± 70.05
 Race/ethnicity, No. (%)
 White88 (50)30 (43)30 (52)27 (47)
 Black27 (15)9 (13)10 (17)8 (14)
 Hispanic43 (25)24 (34)15 (26)17 (29)
 Asian7 (4)2 (3)1 (2)2 (3)
 Other1 (1)000
 Unknown9 (5)5 (7)2 (3)4 (7)
Baseline comorbidities
 Diabetes mellitus, No. (%)78 (45)41 (59)0.2830 (52)31 (53)0.03
 Coronary artery disease, No. (%)45 (26)13 (19)0.1711 (19)13 (22)0.09
 Heart failure, No. (%)35 (20)10 (14)0.155 (9)9 (16)0.21
 Asthma/COPD, No. (%)37 (21)13 (19)0.0610 (17)11 (19)0.04
 Chronic kidney disease (creatinine >3 mg/dL), No. (%)10 (6)3 (4)0.071 (2)3 (5)0.19
 Pulmonary hypertension, No. (%)7 (4)1 (1)0.161 (1)1 (1)0
 Peripheral arterial disease, No. (%)18 (10)9 (13)0.087 (12)9 (16)0.10
 Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean±SD2.1 ± 2.02.0 ± 1.70.071.8 ± 1.72.1 ± 1.60.18
Baseline medications, No. (%)
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker88 (50)37 (53)0.0529 (50)30 (52)0.03
 Thiazide diuretic34 (19)16 (23)0.0814 (24)14 (24)0
 Loop diuretic29 (17)11 (16)0.028 (14)8 (14)0
 Beta blocker66 (38)31 (44)0.1323 (40)24 (41)0.04
 Statins96 (55)46 (66)0.2234 (59)36 (62)0.07
 Aspirin76 (43)29 (41)0.0422 (38)26 (45)0.14
Clinical presentation
 SpO2 % in ED, median (interquartile range)96 (94-97)94 (92-97)0.4296 (94-97)94.5 (91 -97)0.40
 SpO2 in ED <90%, No. (%)8 (5)11 (16)0.382 (3)9 (16)0.42
 P:F ratio after intubation, mean±SD (No.)210 ± 91 (55)164 ± 81 (35)0.53225 ± 90 (17)164 ± 83 (28)0.71
Baseline Characteristics Stratified by Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Exposure Over a median follow up of 10 days (interquartile range, 6-21), 111 patients (45%) had a primary end point (90 were intubated, 21 died before intubation). Patients who were taking CCBs had an increased risk of the primary end point: 40 patients (57%) vs 71 (41%); hazard ratio (HR), 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.6); P = .004) (Fig 1 ). After multivariable adjustment, the association persisted: HR, 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2-2.8); P = .006. An additional multivariable-adjusted competing-risk analysis evaluating risk of intubation alone revealed similar findings: HR, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2-3.0); P = .006). Among the 90 patients who were intubated, those taking CCBs had a lower Pao 2:Fio 2 ratio on the postintubation arterial blood gas than patients not taking CCBs (Table 1). At time of censoring, 53 patients (22%) had died (CCB, 27%; no CCB, 19%), 2 (1%) remained hospitalized (CCB, 0%; no CCB, 1%), and 190 (77%) survived to hospital discharge (CCB, 73%; no CCB, 79%; P = .29).
Figure 1

A-B, Risk of intubation or death in patients with COVID-19 according to calcium channel blocker exposure. A, Unmatched cohort. B, Propensity score matched cohort.

A-B, Risk of intubation or death in patients with COVID-19 according to calcium channel blocker exposure. A, Unmatched cohort. B, Propensity score matched cohort. Given that 37 patients (53%) in the CCB group had their CCBs discontinued on hospital admission, we performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the association between CCB use and the primary end point within 24 hours of admission, before the potential expected effect of drug discontinuation. CCB use was associated with a two-fold increased risk of intubation and death (95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P = .03) within 24 hours of admission. In the propensity score matched sample, 55 patients (47%) had a primary end point (45 were intubated, 10 died before intubation). Similar to the unmatched cohort, patients who had been taking CCBs had an increased risk of the primary end point: HR, 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1-3.2); P = .02 (Fig 1). Adjustment for the five covariates with standardized difference of >0.1 (Table 1) revealed an HR of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1-3.3; P = .02). As a robustness check, an inverse probability treatment weighted Cox model yielded similar results: HR, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.3; P = .02). At time of censoring, 27 patients (23%) had died (CCB, 29%; no CCB, 17%), and 89 patients survived to hospital discharge (CCB, 71%; no CCB, 83%; P = .12).

Discussion

In our cohort of consecutive patients who were hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19, patients with a history of hypertension who had been taking dihydropyridine CCBs had a significantly increased risk of intubation or death compared with those not taking dihydropyridine CCBs. These findings support the pathophysiologic-based hypothesis that, in patients with COVID-19, dihydropyridine CCBs (medications that can disrupt hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction) are associated with an increased risk for respiratory failure. Our results are consistent with previously published data that showed a modestly increased likelihood of severe COVID-19 in patients with hypertension who were taking CCBs. Additionally, previous research has demonstrated that, in patients with ARDS, systemically administered pulmonary vasodilators can decrease regional hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction leading to worse hypoxemia, whereas selective pulmonary vasodilation with the use of inhaled pulmonary vasodilators can attenuate hypoxemia through improving / mismatch by acting in only well-ventilated lung regions. Limitations include small sample size, retrospective observational study design; although we adjusted for likely confounders, we were unable to adjust for chronicity of hypertension and cannot rule out unmeasured confounding. Although we would not advocate currently for a change in practice based on these results, we would urge caution against the suggestion to transition patients empirically from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker to CCBs. If our findings are confirmed, it may be reasonable to transition patients from dihydropyridine CCBs to alternative agents. Given the high prevalence of hypertension and its associated risk for COVID-19 coupled with the frequency of dihydropyridine CCB use, these findings may have significant public health implications and warrant further study.
  8 in total

1.  Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Gas Exchange in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Peter Radermacher; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Alain Mercat
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Severe, Rapidly Reversible Hypoxemia in the Early Period after Bilateral Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Ankur Mishra; Robert M Reed; Michael Eberlein
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-06

3.  Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress.

Authors:  John J Marini; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Inhibition of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by nifedipine.

Authors:  G Simonneau; P Escourrou; P Duroux; A Lockhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?

Authors:  Lei Fang; George Karakiulakis; Michael Roth
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 30.700

6.  Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Covid-19.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; Samrachana Adhikari; Claudia Pulgarin; Andrea B Troxel; Eduardo Iturrate; Stephen B Johnson; Anaïs Hausvater; Jonathan D Newman; Jeffrey S Berger; Sripal Bangalore; Stuart D Katz; Glenn I Fishman; Dennis Kunichoff; Yu Chen; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Joshua Geleris; Yifei Sun; Jonathan Platt; Jason Zucker; Matthew Baldwin; George Hripcsak; Angelena Labella; Daniel K Manson; Christine Kubin; R Graham Barr; Magdalena E Sobieszczyk; Neil W Schluger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Rob Mac Sweeney; Daniel F McAuley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Hypocalcemia in COVID-19: Prevalence, clinical significance and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Luigi di Filippo; Mauro Doga; Stefano Frara; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Perspectives on nano-nutraceuticals to manage pre and post COVID-19 infections.

Authors:  Ankit Kumar Dubey; Suman Kumar Chaudhry; Harikesh Bahadur Singh; Vijai Kumar Gupta; Ajeet Kaushik
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 3.  Effects of nutrients on immunomodulation in patients with severe COVID-19: Current knowledge.

Authors:  Bruna Teixeira da Costa; Glauber Rocha Lima Araújo; Ronaldo Teixeira da Silva Júnior; Luana Kauany de Sá Santos; Vinícius Lima de Souza Gonçalves; Daniel Bastos Alves Lima; Beatriz Rocha Cuzzuol; Jonathan Santos Apolonio; Lorena Sousa de Carvalho; Hanna Santos Marques; Camilo Santana Silva; Isadora de Souza Barcelos; Márcio Vasconcelos Oliveira; Fabrício Freire de Melo
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-07-09

4.  Network-Based Data Analysis Reveals Ion Channel-Related Gene Features in COVID-19: A Bioinformatic Approach.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Ting Feng
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.220

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.