Literature DB >> 33548005

Emotional stress and reproduction: what do fertility patients believe?

Olivia Negris1, Angela Lawson2, Dannielle Brown1, Christopher Warren1,3, Isabel Galic1, Alexandria Bozen1, Amelia Swanson2, Tarun Jain4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To better understand the beliefs about a causal role of emotional stress maintained by women seeking fertility care.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was distributed to fertility care patients at an academic fertility center in Illinois. Of 5000 consecutive patients, 1460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample.
RESULTS: Members of our sample (N = 1460) were between 20 and 58 years (mean = 36.2, SD = 4.4). Most respondents were White (72.2%), were in a heterosexual relationship (86.8%), and felt that their physician understood their cultural background (79.4%). Of the sample, 28.9% believed emotional stress could cause infertility, 69.0% believed emotional stress could reduce success with fertility treatment, and 31.3% believed that emotional stress could cause a miscarriage, with evidence of significant racial differences. Less than a quarter (23.8%) of the sample believed emotional stress had no impact on fertility. Lower household income and educational attainment were associated with a greater belief in emotional stress as a causative factor in reproduction with regard to infertility, fertility treatment, and miscarriage.
CONCLUSION: The majority of women seeking fertility care believe emotional stress could reduce the success of fertility treatment. Furthermore, beliefs about emotional stress and reproduction significantly differ based on race/ethnicity, income, and education. Particular attention should be paid to specific groups of women who may more likely not be aware of the lack of a proven biological relationship between emotional stress and reproduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility; Internet resources; MAR; Medically assisted reproduction; Racial disparities; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33548005      PMCID: PMC8079591          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02079-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  1 in total

Review 1.  Psychological and educational interventions for subfertile men and women.

Authors:  Jolijn Verkuijlen; Christianne Verhaak; Willianne L D M Nelen; Jack Wilkinson; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-31
  1 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  A review of disparities in access to infertility care and treatment outcomes among Hispanic women.

Authors:  Allison S Komorowski; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 2.  Reprotoxic Impact of Environment, Diet, and Behavior.

Authors:  Alessandra Gallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.