Literature DB >> 33547647

Optimal trough concentration of teicoplanin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuki Hanai1, Yoshiko Takahashi2, Takashi Niwa3, Toshihiko Mayumi4, Yukihiro Hamada5, Toshimi Kimura5, Kazuaki Matsumoto6, Satoshi Fujii7, Yoshio Takesue8.   

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND
OBJECTIVE: It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin ) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 μg/ml for difficult-to-treat complicated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 μg/ml is required for non-complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin  = 15-30 μg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin .
METHODS: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin  = 15-30 μg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin  < 15 μg/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-6.32, p = 0.02). The all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the groups (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.13-1.61, p = 0.22). Cmin  = 15-30 μg/ml did not increase the risks of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49-1.69, p = 0.76) or hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.18-2.44, p = 0.54). WHAT IS NEW AND
CONCLUSION: Teicoplanin therapy using a Cmin target of 15-30 μg/ml is likely to be associated with better clinical responses than Cmin  < 15 μg/ml without increasing the risk of adverse effects.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gram-positive bacteria; meta-analysis; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; teicoplanin; therapeutic drug monitoring; trough concentration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33547647     DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  2 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Dose Optimization of Teicoplanin for Critically Ill Patients With Renal Dysfunction and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Experience From a Prospective Interventional Study.

Authors:  Lu Shi; Zhiwei Zhuang; Lufen Duan; Chenqi Zhu; Hongzhi Xue; Xiao Wang; Xiaowen Xu; Yunlong Yuan; Ling Shi; Jiahui Li; Jiantong Sun; Xin Liu; Qin Zhou; Jian Lu; Lian Tang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.