Literature DB >> 33547585

Safety and Efficacy of Early (<4 Weeks of Illness) Endoscopic Transmural Drainage of Post-acute Pancreatic Necrosis Predominantly Located in the Body of the Pancreas.

Surinder Singh Rana1, Ravi Sharma2, Kamal Kishore3, Lovneet Dhalaria2, Rajesh Gupta4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transmural drainage is usually not performed for pancreatic necrotic collection (PNC) < 4 weeks after onset of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) because of lack of encapsulating wall and increased risk of complications.
OBJECTIVE: Study safety and efficacy of early (<4 weeks) endoscopic transluminal drainage in patients with symptomatic PNC.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data base of patients with PNC treated with endoscopic transmural drainage within 4 weeks of onset of ANP (early drainage) was done. The outcomes and complications were compared with patients with PNC who underwent delayed endoscopic drainage (≥4 weeks of onset of ANP).
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (26 males; mean age: 35.9 ± 8.6 years) underwent early and 136 patients (115 males; mean age: 37.9 ± 9.4 years) underwent delayed endoscopic drainage. The PNC was significantly larger (12.3 ± 2.1 cm vs 10.5 ± 2.7 cm, p <0.001) with increased solid component (47.7 ± 8.9% vs 28.3 ± 11.7%, p <0.001) in the early group. Clinical success was achieved in 94% patients in the early group and all patients in the delayed group. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy was performed more frequently in the early group (50% vs 7.4%; p<0.001). There was increased mortality (5.7% vs 0%), need for rescue surgical necrosectomy (5.7% vs 0%), and clinically significant bleeding (20% vs 1.5%, p<0.001) in the early group as compared to the delayed group.
CONCLUSION: Early endoscopic drainage of PNC is feasible and seems to be safe as well as effective but is associated with increased risk of complications as compared to delayed drainage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pancreatitis; Computed tomography; Endosonography; Pancreatic necrosis; Stent

Year:  2021        PMID: 33547585     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04945-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  3 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Ajay P Belgaumkar; Adam Haswell; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-16

2.  Efficacy and safety of plastic versus lumen-apposing metal stents for transmural drainage of walled-off necrosis: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Surinder Singh Rana; Ravi Sharma; Lovneet Dhalaria; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-25

3.  Morphological features of fluid collections on endoscopic ultrasound in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: do they change over time?

Authors:  Surinder S Rana; Deepak K Bhasin; Yalaka Rami Reddy; Vishal Sharma; Chalapathi Rao; Ravi K Sharma; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2014
  3 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound drainage for the management of fluid collections after pancreas surgery.

Authors:  Ali Ramouz; Saeed Shafiei; Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh; Elias Khajeh; Ricardo Rio-Tinto; Sanam Fakour; Andreas Brandl; Gil Goncalves; Christoph Berchtold; Markus W Büchler; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Endoscopic step up: When and how.

Authors:  Vaneet Jearth; Surinder S Rana
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 3.  Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yousuke Nakai; Hideyuki Shiomi; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Shogo Ota; Mamoru Takenaka; Takuji Iwashita; Tatsuya Sato; Tomotaka Saito; Atsuhiro Masuda; Saburo Matsubara; Keisuke Iwata; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Hiroyuki Isayama; Ichiro Yasuda
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2022-10-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.