Literature DB >> 33547540

A retrospective observation on 105 patients with chronic cluster headache receiving indomethacin.

Anaé Monta1, Sylvain Redon2, Cyprien Fabre3, Anne Donnet1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indomethacin (IMC) as a prophylactic treatment is considered to be ineffective in cluster headache (CH). However, small series suggested the interest of IMC in CH. Some authors support that an IMC test is useful in all trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. We described clinical features of IMC responders in a retrospective cohort of chronic cluster headache (CCH).
METHODS: This single-center and retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care specialist headache center in France. Patients were selected between January 2007 and December 2008. We included all patients fulfilling CCH criteria (ICHD-3-beta). Data were collected from medical records. We recorded all the prescriptions of IMC as a prophylactic treatment. Responders were defined by 50% reduction in attack frequency; complete response was defined by disappearance of the attacks. The non-responders must have received at least 100 mg daily during 7 days.
RESULTS: The study consisted of 324 CCH, 121 female (37%) and 203 males (63%) with an average age at onset of 33.93 (± 14.71) years. Of the patients, 105 were treated with IMC. Thirty patients (29%) were responders. Thirty-four patients (32%) were non-responders. Responding status was undefined for 41 patients (39%). Twelve patients (11%) had a complete response. Responders were composed by 18 women (60%) and 12 men (40%) and had on average 44.89 (± 12.88) years. The minimal effective dose was 86.11 mg daily (± 48.72). DISCUSSION: This study shows the interest of IMC in CCH patients. We recommend an IMC test as a third-line treatment in CCH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indotest; NSAID; Primary headache; Prophylactic treatment; Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia

Year:  2021        PMID: 33547540     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05114-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  23 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of Cluster Headache: The American Headache Society Evidence-Based Guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew S Robbins; Amaal J Starling; Tamara M Pringsheim; Werner J Becker; Todd J Schwedt
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of cluster headache.

Authors:  David J Capobianco; David W Dodick
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.420

3.  Verapamil in the prophylaxis of episodic cluster headache: a double-blind study versus placebo.

Authors:  M Leone; D D'Amico; F Frediani; F Moschiano; L Grazzi; A Attanasio; G Bussone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Prophylactic treatment of cluster headache with verapamil.

Authors:  I J Gabai; E L Spierings
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.887

5.  EFNS guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache and other trigeminal-autonomic cephalalgias.

Authors:  A May; M Leone; J Afra; M Linde; P S Sándor; S Evers; P J Goadsby
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 6.  Cluster headache responsive to indomethacin: Case reports and a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Sanjay Prakash; Nilima D Shah; Bhavna V Chavda
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 7.  Indomethacin Responsive Headaches: Exhaustive Systematic Review with Pooled Analysis and Critical Appraisal of 81 Published Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Emilia C Bordini; Carlos A Bordini; Yohannes W Woldeamanuel; Alan M Rapoport
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 8.  The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies.

Authors:  M Fischera; M Marziniak; I Gralow; S Evers
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  Chronic cluster headache: a French clinical descriptive study.

Authors:  A Donnet; M Lanteri-Minet; E Guegan-Massardier; G Mick; N Fabre; G Géraud; C Lucas; M Navez; D Valade
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Dorcas Beaton; Charles S Cleeland; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Robert D Kerns; Deborah N Ader; Nancy Brandenburg; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Julie Chandler; Penny Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Raymond Dionne; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Nathaniel P Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Cynthia McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Henry J McQuay; Sanjay Patel; Linda Porter; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Dennis A Revicki; Margaret Rothman; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett R Stacey; Joseph W Stauffer; Thorsten von Stein; Richard E White; James Witter; Stojan Zavisic
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.