Bernardo Meza-Torres1,2, Fabrizio Carinci3,4, Christian Heiss3,5, Mark Joy6, Simon de Lusignan6. 1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. bernardo.meza-torres@phc.ox.ac.uk. 2. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. bernardo.meza-torres@phc.ox.ac.uk. 3. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. 4. Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 5. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, UK. 6. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: Despite the evidence available on the epidemiology of diabetic foot ulcers and associated complications, it is not clear how specific organizational aspects of health care systems can positively affect their clinical trajectory. We aim to evaluate the impact of organizational aspects of care on lower extremity amputation rates among people with type 2 diabetes affected by foot ulcers. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature published between 1999 and 2019, using the following key terms as search criteria: people with type 2 diabetes, diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcer, treated with specific processes and care pathways, and LEA as primary outcome. Overall results were reported as pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals obtained using fixed and random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 57 studies were found eligible, highlighting the following arrangements: dedicated teams, care pathways and protocols, multidisciplinary teams, and combined interventions. Among them, seven studies qualified for a meta-analysis. According to the random effects model, interventions including any of the four arrangements were associated with a 29% reduced risk of any type of lower extremity amputation (OR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.96). The effect was larger when focusing on major LEAs alone, leading to a 48% risk reduction (OR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Specific organizational arrangements including multidisciplinary teams and care pathways can prevent half of the amputations in people with diabetes and foot ulcers. Further studies using standardized criteria are needed to investigate the cost-effectiveness to facilitate wider implementation of improved organizational arrangements. Similarly, research should identify specific roadblocks to translating evidence into action. These may be structures and processes at the health system level, e.g. availability of professionals with the right skillset, reimbursement mechanisms, and clear organizational intervention implementation guidelines.
AIMS: Despite the evidence available on the epidemiology of diabetic foot ulcers and associated complications, it is not clear how specific organizational aspects of health care systems can positively affect their clinical trajectory. We aim to evaluate the impact of organizational aspects of care on lower extremity amputation rates among people with type 2 diabetes affected by foot ulcers. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature published between 1999 and 2019, using the following key terms as search criteria: people with type 2 diabetes, diagnosed with diabetic foot ulcer, treated with specific processes and care pathways, and LEA as primary outcome. Overall results were reported as pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals obtained using fixed and random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 57 studies were found eligible, highlighting the following arrangements: dedicated teams, care pathways and protocols, multidisciplinary teams, and combined interventions. Among them, seven studies qualified for a meta-analysis. According to the random effects model, interventions including any of the four arrangements were associated with a 29% reduced risk of any type of lower extremity amputation (OR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.96). The effect was larger when focusing on major LEAs alone, leading to a 48% risk reduction (OR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Specific organizational arrangements including multidisciplinary teams and care pathways can prevent half of the amputations in people with diabetes and foot ulcers. Further studies using standardized criteria are needed to investigate the cost-effectiveness to facilitate wider implementation of improved organizational arrangements. Similarly, research should identify specific roadblocks to translating evidence into action. These may be structures and processes at the health system level, e.g. availability of professionals with the right skillset, reimbursement mechanisms, and clear organizational intervention implementation guidelines.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetic foot ulcers; Health service organization; Lower extremity amputation; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: William J Jeffcoate; Loretta Vileikyte; Edward J Boyko; David G Armstrong; Andrew J M Boulton Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J Bradford Rice; Urvi Desai; Alice Kate G Cummings; Howard G Birnbaum; Michelle Skornicki; Nathan B Parsons Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David J Margolis; Ole Hoffstad; Jeffrey Nafash; Charles E Leonard; Cristin P Freeman; Sean Hennessy; Douglas J Wiebe Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Bernardo Meza-Torres; Scott G Cunningham; Christian Heiss; Mark Joy; Michael Feher; Graham P Leese; Simon de Lusignan; Fabrizio Carinci Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 4.061
Authors: Byron M Perrin; Anita Raspovic; Cylie M Williams; Stephen M Twigg; Jonathan Golledge; Emma J Hamilton; Anna Crawford; Carol Hargreaves; Jaap J van Netten; Nytasha Purcell; Peter A Lazzarini Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-11