Literature DB >> 33547324

The effects of releasing early results from ongoing clinical trials.

Steffen Ventz1, Sergio Bacallado2, Rifaquat Rahman3, Sara Tolaney3, Jonathan D Schoenfeld3, Brian M Alexander3, Lorenzo Trippa4.   

Abstract

Most trials do not release interim summaries on efficacy and toxicity of the experimental treatments being tested, with this information only released to the public after the trial has ended. While early release of clinical trial data to physicians and patients can inform enrollment decision making, it may also affect key operating characteristics of the trial, statistical validity and trial duration. We investigate the public release of early efficacy and toxicity results, during ongoing clinical studies, to better inform patients about their enrollment options. We use simulation models of phase II glioblastoma (GBM) clinical trials in which early efficacy and toxicity estimates are periodically released accordingly to a pre-specified protocol. Patients can use the reported interim efficacy and toxicity information, with the support of physicians, to decide which trial to enroll in. We describe potential effects on various operating characteristics, including the study duration, selection bias and power.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33547324      PMCID: PMC7864990          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21116-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  32 in total

1.  Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Susan Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Fujian Song; Andrew Vickers; Tom Jefferson; Kay Dickersin; Peter C Gøtzsche; Harlan M Krumholz; Davina Ghersi; H Bart van der Worp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

4.  Adding experimental arms to platform clinical trials: randomization procedures and interim analyses.

Authors:  Steffen Ventz; Matteo Cellamare; Giovanni Parmigiani; Lorenzo Trippa
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Patient entry into randomized controlled trials of colorectal cancer treatment: factors influencing participation.

Authors:  Michael J Solomon; Chet K Pager; Jane M Young; Rachael Roberts; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Kathleen Ruccione; Robert J Wells; Jay B Long; Wendy Pelletier; Mary C Hooke; Rebecca D Pentz; Robert B Noll; Justin N Baker; Maura O'Leary; Gregory Reaman; Peter C Adamson; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data.

Authors:  Ian R White; Nicholas J Horton; James Carpenter; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-07

9.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  The role of therapeutic optimism in recruitment to a clinical trial in a peripartum setting: balancing hope and uncertainty.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Claire Snowdon; Susan Morrow; Jane E Norman; Fiona C Denison; Julia Lawton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  1 in total

1.  Achieving Equity in Diabetes Research: Borrowing From the Field of Quality Improvement Using a Practical Framework and Improvement Tools.

Authors:  Osagie Ebekozien; Ann Mungmode; Don Buckingham; Margaret Greenfield; Rashida Talib; Devin Steenkamp; J Sonya Haw; Ori Odugbesan; Michael Harris; Priyanka Mathias; Jane K Dickinson; Shivani Agarwal
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2022-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.