| Literature DB >> 33547011 |
Yi Xia1, Lu-Shao-Bo Shi2, Jing-Hui Chang2, Hua-Zhang Miao2, Dong Wang3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become an increasingly severe public health emergency. Although traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has helped to combat COVID-19, public perception of TCM remains controversial. We used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to identify factors that affect the intention to use TCM.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; Intention; Theory of planned behavior; Traditional Chinese medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33547011 PMCID: PMC7826027 DOI: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.01.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Integr Med
Fig. 1Conceptual framework and hypotheses of the study. H1: SN have a positive influence on intention to use TCM; H2: attitude positively affects the intention to use TCM; H3: PBC positively affects the intention to use TCM; H4: PB has a positive influence on intention to use TCM; H5: SN has a positive influence on attitudes to TCM use; H6: PBC has a positive influence on attitudes to TCM use; H7: cognition positively affects attitudes toward TCM use. ATT: attitude; BI: behavior intention; C: cognition; H: hypothesis; PB: past behavior; PBC: perceived behavioral control; SN: subjective norm; TCM: traditional Chinese medicine.
Fig. 2Structural equation model on intention of TCM utilization based on the theory of planned behavior. Standardized path coefficients were presented; the solid lines indicate the paths with statistical significance. ATT: attitude; BI: behavior intention; C: cognition; PB: past behavior; PBC: perceived behavioral control; SN: subjective norm. ***P < 0.001.
Maximum likelihood parameter estimates for the structural equation model.
| Correlation of parameter | b | SE | CR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATT | 0.386 | 0.011 | 35.830 | 0.285 | < 0.001 |
| ATT | 0.241 | 0.012 | 20.030 | 0.280 | < 0.001 |
| ATT | 0.361 | 0.013 | 28.663 | 0.413 | < 0.001 |
| BI | 0.555 | 0.013 | 41.330 | 0.451 | < 0.001 |
| BI | 0.201 | 0.013 | 15.163 | 0.190 | < 0.001 |
| BI | 0.211 | 0.009 | 22.885 | 0.229 | < 0.001 |
| BI | 0.117 | 0.016 | 7.304 | 0.109 | < 0.001 |
| C1 | 1.000 | 0.676 | |||
| C2 | 1.871 | 0.023 | 81.777 | 0.859 | < 0.001 |
| C3 | 1.970 | 0.022 | 87.764 | 0.934 | < 0.001 |
| C4 | 2.018 | 0.023 | 87.897 | 0.934 | < 0.001 |
| C5 | 1.998 | 0.025 | 80.417 | 0.840 | < 0.001 |
| C6 | 1.980 | 0.026 | 74.876 | 0.775 | < 0.001 |
| C7 | 1.915 | 0.023 | 83.219 | 0.876 | < 0.001 |
| ATT1 | 1.000 | 0.890 | |||
| ATT2 | 1.055 | 0.008 | 126.204 | 0.868 | < 0.001 |
| ATT3 | 1.007 | 0.008 | 131.573 | 0.886 | < 0.001 |
| SN1 | 1.000 | 0.936 | |||
| SN2 | 1.041 | 0.005 | 200.955 | 0.949 | < 0.001 |
| SN3 | 1.005 | 0.005 | 187.038 | 0.933 | < 0.001 |
| SN4 | 1.033 | 0.006 | 160.284 | 0.892 | < 0.001 |
| PBC1 | 1.000 | 0.770 | |||
| PBC2 | 1.044 | 0.011 | 95.913 | 0.839 | < 0.001 |
| PBC3 | 0.993 | 0.011 | 92.982 | 0.820 | < 0.001 |
| PBC4 | 0.924 | 0.01 | 95.830 | 0.851 | < 0.001 |
| PBC5 | 1.034 | 0.01 | 99.826 | 0.883 | < 0.001 |
| PBC6 | 1.037 | 0.01 | 99.447 | 0.881 | < 0.001 |
| PB1 | 1.000 | 0.862 | |||
| PB2 | 1.076 | 0.012 | 92.628 | 0.766 | < 0.001 |
| PB3 | 1.000 | 0.01 | 102.976 | 0.853 | < 0.001 |
| BI1 | 1.000 | 0.943 | |||
| BI2 | 1.014 | 0.005 | 192.056 | 0.956 | < 0.001 |
ATT: attitude; b: unstandardized path coefficient; BI: behavior intention; C: cognition; CR: critical value; PB: past behavior; PBC: perceived behavioral control; SE: standard error; SN: subjective norm; β: standardized path coefficient.