Literature DB >> 33546952

Management of Large Segmental Bone Defects at the Knee With Intramedullary Stabilized Antibiotic Spacers During Two-Stage Treatment of Endoprosthetic Joint Infection.

Joseph A Ippolito1, Jennifer E Thomson1, Steven M Rivero1, Kathleen S Beebe1, Francis R Patterson1, Joseph Benevenia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following debridement of infected prostheses that require reconstruction with an endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), instability related to segmental residual bone defects present a challenge in management with 2-stage reimplantation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for revision total joint or endoprosthetic infection at the knee from 1998 to 2018. At our institution, patients with skeletal defects >6 cm following explant of prosthesis and debridement (stage 1) were managed with intramedullary nail-stabilized antibiotic spacers. Following stage 1, antimicrobial therapy included 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and a minimum of 6 weeks of oral antibiotics. Following resolution of inflammatory markers and negative tissue cultures, reimplantation (stage 2) of an EPR was performed.
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients at a mean age of 54 ± 21 years were treated for prosthetic joint infection at the knee. Polymicrobial growth was detected in 38% of cases, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%) and Staphylococcus aureus (19%). Mean residual skeletal defect after stage 1 treatment was 20 cm. Prosthetic joint infection eradication was achieved in 18 (86%) patients, with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 77% and mean knee range of motion of 100°. Patients with polymicrobial infections had a greater number of surgeries prior to infection (P = .024), and were more likely to require additional debridement prior to EPR (odds ratio 12.0, P = .048).
CONCLUSION: Management of large segmental skeletal defects at the knee following explant using intramedullary stabilized antibiotic spacers maintain stability and result in high rates of limb salvage with conversion to an endoprosthesis.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; megaprosthesis; prosthetic joint infection; revision arthroplasty; total joint replacement; tumor prosthesis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546952     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

Review 1.  Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: (1) basic science and principles.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Erhu Li; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 2.  Are Static Spacers Superior to Articulated Spacers in the Staged Treatment of Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michele Fiore; Andrea Sambri; Matteo Filippini; Lorenzo Morante; Claudio Giannini; Azzurra Paolucci; Claudia Rondinella; Renato Zunarelli; Pierluigi Viale; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.