Literature DB >> 33546485

Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax® Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax® 5).

Mark Westman1, Jacqueline Norris1, Richard Malik2, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann3, Yasmin A Parr4, Emma Armstrong4, Mike McDonald5, Evelyn Hall1, Paul Sheehy1, Margaret J Hosie4.   

Abstract

A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax® Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax® 5. Serum samples from 428 FeLV-uninfected cats (118 FeLV-vaccinated and 310 FeLV-unvaccinated) were tested for anti-FeLV neutralising antibodies (NAb) using a live virus neutralisation assay to identify 378 FeLV-unexposed (NAb-negative) and 50 FeLV-exposed (NAb-positive; abortive infections) cats, following by anti-surface unit (SU) FeLV-A and FeLV-B antibody ELISA testing. An additional 42 FeLV-infected cats (28 presumptively regressively infected, 14 presumptively progressively infected) were also tested for anti-SU antibodies. NAb-positive cats displayed significantly higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses compared to NAb-negative cats (p < 0.001). FeLV-unexposed cats (NAb-negative) that had been vaccinated less than 18 months after a previous FeLV vaccination using the monovalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax® Lv-K) displayed higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses than a comparable group vaccinated with the polyvalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax® 5) (p < 0.001 for both anti-FeLV-A and FeLV-B SU antibody responses). This difference in anti-SU antibody responses between cats vaccinated with the monovalent or polyvalent vaccine, however, was not observed in cats that had been naturally exposed to FeLV (NAb-positive) (p = 0.33). It was postulated that vaccination with Fel-O-Vax® 5 primed the humoral response prior to FeLV exposure, such that antibody production increased when the animal was challenged, while vaccination with Fel-O-Vax® Lv-K induced an immediate preparatory antibody response that did not quantitatively increase after FeLV exposure. These results raise questions about the comparable vaccine efficacy of the different FeLV vaccine formulations and correlates of protection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; FeLV infection; FeLV vaccination; humoral immunity; vaccine efficacy; veterinary science

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33546485      PMCID: PMC7913631          DOI: 10.3390/v13020240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viruses        ISSN: 1999-4915            Impact factor:   5.048


  56 in total

1.  Vaccination against the feline leukaemia virus: outcome and response categories and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Regina Hofmann-Lehmann; Valentino Cattori; Ravi Tandon; Felicitas S Boretti; Marina L Meli; Barbara Riond; Andrea C Pepin; Barbara Willi; Pete Ossent; Hans Lutz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Vaccination reduces the viral load and the risk of transmission of Jembrana disease virus in Bali cattle.

Authors:  William G F Ditcham; Joshua R Lewis; Robert J Dobson; Nining Hartaningsih; Graham E Wilcox; Moira Desport
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Comparison of three feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) point-of-care antigen test kits using blood and saliva.

Authors:  Mark E Westman; Richard Malik; Evelyn Hall; Paul A Sheehy; Jacqueline M Norris
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.268

4.  Humoral immune reactivity to feline leukemia virus and associated antigens in cats naturally infected with feline leukemia virus.

Authors:  H Lutz; N Pedersen; J Higgins; U Hübscher; F A Troy; G H Theilen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  What's New in Feline Leukemia Virus Infection.

Authors:  Katrin Hartmann; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.093

6.  Re-examination of feline leukemia virus: host relationships using real-time PCR.

Authors:  Andrea N Torres; Candace K Mathiason; Edward A Hoover
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Protection against feline leukemia virus challenge for at least 2 years after vaccination with an inactivated feline leukemia virus vaccine.

Authors:  Faris F Jirjis; Tamara Davis; Jennifer Lane; Kari Carritt; Diane Sweeney; James Williams; Terri Wasmoen
Journal:  Vet Ther       Date:  2010

8.  Feline leukemia virus immunity induced by whole inactivated virus vaccination.

Authors:  Andrea N Torres; Kevin P O'Halloran; Laurie J Larson; Ronald D Schultz; Edward A Hoover
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Vaccination at different anatomic sites induces different levels of the immune responses.

Authors:  Haibo Jin; Ye Xu; Fushan Shi; Songhua Hu
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.534

10.  Recombinant FeLV vaccine: long-term protection and effect on course and outcome of FIV infection.

Authors:  R Hofmann-Lehmann; E Holznagel; A Aubert; P Ossent; M Reinacher; H Lutz
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.046

View more
  2 in total

1.  Special Issue: Viral Infections in Companion Animals.

Authors:  Margaret J Hosie; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.818

2.  Measuring the Humoral Immune Response in Cats Exposed to Feline Leukaemia Virus.

Authors:  Yasmin A Parr; Melissa J Beall; Julie K Levy; Michael McDonald; Natascha T Hamman; Brian J Willett; Margaret J Hosie
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 5.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.