Literature DB >> 3354548

Evaluating obstetric risk scores by receiver operating characteristic curves.

A A Herman1, L M Irwig, H T Groeneveld.   

Abstract

The purpose of obstetric risk scoring systems is to identify pregnancies that will end in poor perinatal outcomes such as perinatal death. The proportion of such pregnancies identified by a risk scoring system can be increased by choosing a more lenient threshold criterion for the score beyond which the pregnancy is regarded as being at risk. This increase in sensitivity is gained at the expense of a decrease in specificity. Thresholds differ between published risk scoring systems, making it difficult to assess their relative merits using the measures of sensitivity and specificity. However, risk scores can be compared by constructing receiver operating characteristic curves, i.e., plotting the true positive rate against the false positive rate for multiple thresholds and calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (theta). In published systems used in this paper, values of theta, used to rank published obstetric risk scoring systems, ranged from 0.49-0.95. All scores used prepregnancy and early antenatal information. The risk scores with the highest predictive accuracy tended to include factors representing past reproductive experience and those from the late antenatal and intrapartum periods. Studies with statistical weighting of risk factors tended to use fewer late prenatal and intrapartum risk factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3354548     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of two media for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria using the receiver operating characteristic procedure.

Authors:  O Castel; G Grollier; G Agius; G Toullat; Y de Rautlin de la Roy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Reliability of guide to pregnancy risk grading.

Authors:  J W Goodwin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Receipt of recommended prenatal interventions and birth weight among African-American women: analysis of data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey.

Authors:  M T Covington; R J Rice
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-09

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Antenatal Risk Scoring Systems in India to Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Dinesh Raj Pallepogula; Adhisivam Bethou; Vishnu Bhat Ballambatu; Gowri Dorairajan; Ganesh Kumar Saya; Sureshkumar Kamalakannan; Sandhya Karra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-07-12

5.  Antenatal screening: its use in assessing obstetric risk factors in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  V D Tsu
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Alpha-L-fucosidase as a serum marker of hepatocellular carcinoma in southern African blacks.

Authors:  S Bukofzer; P M Stass; M C Kew; M de Beer; H T Groeneveld
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A Novel Afrocentric Stroke Risk Assessment Score: Models from the Siren Study.

Authors:  Onoja Akpa; Fred S Sarfo; Mayowa Owolabi; Albert Akpalu; Kolawole Wahab; Reginald Obiako; Morenikeji Komolafe; Lukman Owolabi; Godwin O Osaigbovo; Godwin Ogbole; Hemant K Tiwari; Carolyn Jenkins; Adekunle G Fakunle; Samuel Olowookere; Ezinne O Uvere; Joshua Akinyemi; Oyedunni Arulogun; Josephine Akpalu; Moyinoluwalogo M Tito-Ilori; Osahon J Asowata; Philip Ibinaiye; Cynthia Akisanya; Olalekan I Oyinloye; Lambert Appiah; Taofik Sunmonu; Paul Olowoyo; Atinuke M Agunloye; Abiodun M Adeoye; Joseph Yaria; Daniel T Lackland; Donna Arnett; Ruth Y Laryea; Taiwo O Adigun; Akinkunmi P Okekunle; Benedict Calys-Tagoe; Okechukwu S Ogah; Mayowa Ogunronbi; Olugbo Y Obiabo; Suleiman Y Isah; Hamisu A Dambatta; Raelle Tagge; Obande Ogenyi; Bimbo Fawale; Chimdinma L Melikam; Akinola Onasanya; Sunday Adeniyi; Rufus Akinyemi; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.