Jennifer Fantasia1, Sammy Elsamra2, Simone Thavaseelan3. 1. Assistant Professor of Surgery (Urology), University of Massachusetts. 2. Associate Professor of Surgery (Urology), Rutgers University. 3. Associate Professor of Surgery (Urology), Clinician Educator, Alpert Medical School of Brown. Electronic address: SThavaseelan@Lifespan.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To outline the principles and premise, pros and cons of the use of preference signaling (PS) in the Urology Match. METHODS: PS is a standardized system in which a student may send a signal or token to a particular program to demonstrate genuine interest in advance of application review and interview selection. The available literature of the use of PS in other fields was assessed and applied to the unique construct of the Urology Match. Potential benefits and challenges are discussed and a process and timeline for implementation are presented. RESULTS: PS requires a limited number of signals to maintain value, a transparent system to disclose and distribute signals and continuous data assessment for optimization. It standardizes pre interview communication and highlights for programs which applicants have sincere interest although it does not directly address application overload. CONCLUSION: PS is a viable and equitable method for applicants to indicate interest directly, confidentially and intentionally indicate interest in a program which can allow a program to maximize scarce resources such as time and interview slots in the match process. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVES: To outline the principles and premise, pros and cons of the use of preference signaling (PS) in the Urology Match. METHODS: PS is a standardized system in which a student may send a signal or token to a particular program to demonstrate genuine interest in advance of application review and interview selection. The available literature of the use of PS in other fields was assessed and applied to the unique construct of the Urology Match. Potential benefits and challenges are discussed and a process and timeline for implementation are presented. RESULTS: PS requires a limited number of signals to maintain value, a transparent system to disclose and distribute signals and continuous data assessment for optimization. It standardizes pre interview communication and highlights for programs which applicants have sincere interest although it does not directly address application overload. CONCLUSION: PS is a viable and equitable method for applicants to indicate interest directly, confidentially and intentionally indicate interest in a program which can allow a program to maximize scarce resources such as time and interview slots in the match process. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Alexis E Pelletier-Bui; Benjamin H Schnapp; Liza G Smith; Doug Franzen; Elizabeth Barrall Werley; Erin McDonough; Melanie Camejo Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2021-12-17