Literature DB >> 33544853

Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Lina M León1, Allyson E Park1, Adair L Borges1, Jenny Y Zhang1, Joseph Bondy-Denomy1,2,3.   

Abstract

Bacteria deploy multiple defenses to prevent mobile genetic element (MGEs) invasion. CRISPR-Cas immune systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which counter with anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Our understanding of the biology and co-evolutionary dynamics of the common Type I-C CRISPR-Cas subtype has lagged because it lacks an in vivo phage-host model system. Here, we show the anti-phage function of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-C CRISPR-Cas system encoded on a conjugative pKLC102 island, and its Acr-mediated inhibition by distinct MGEs. Seven genes with anti-Type I-C function (acrIC genes) were identified, many with highly acidic amino acid content, including previously described DNA mimic AcrIF2. Four of the acr genes were broad spectrum, also inhibiting I-E or I-F P. aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas subtypes. Dual inhibition comes at a cost, however, as simultaneous expression of Type I-C and I-F systems renders phages expressing the dual inhibitor AcrIF2 more sensitive to targeting. Mutagenesis of numerous acidic residues in AcrIF2 did not impair anti-I-C or anti-I-F function per se but did exacerbate inhibition defects during competition, suggesting that excess negative charge may buffer DNA mimics against competition. Like AcrIF2, five of the Acr proteins block Cascade from binding DNA, while two function downstream, likely preventing Cas3 recruitment or activity. One such inhibitor, AcrIC3, is found in an 'anti-Cas3' cluster within conjugative elements, encoded alongside bona fide Cas3 inhibitors AcrIF3 and AcrIE1. Our findings demonstrate an active battle between an MGE-encoded CRISPR-Cas system and its diverse MGE targets.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33544853      PMCID: PMC7913775          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  51 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria.

Authors:  Christopher M Thomas; Kaare M Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 with Bacteriophage Proteins.

Authors:  Benjamin J Rauch; Melanie R Silvis; Judd F Hultquist; Christopher S Waters; Michael J McGregor; Nevan J Krogan; Joseph Bondy-Denomy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Diversity of the abundant pKLC102/PAGI-2 family of genomic islands in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jens Klockgether; Dieco Würdemann; Oleg Reva; Lutz Wiehlmann; Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Cas5d protein processes pre-crRNA and assembles into a cascade-like interference complex in subtype I-C/Dvulg CRISPR-Cas system.

Authors:  Ki Hyun Nam; Charles Haitjema; Xueqi Liu; Fran Ding; Hongwei Wang; Matthew P DeLisa; Ailong Ke
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  The CRISPR/Cas adaptive immune system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediates resistance to naturally occurring and engineered phages.

Authors:  Kyle C Cady; Joe Bondy-Denomy; Gary E Heussler; Alan R Davidson; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  CRISPR-Cas in mobile genetic elements: counter-defence and beyond.

Authors:  Guilhem Faure; Sergey A Shmakov; Winston X Yan; David R Cheng; David A Scott; Joseph E Peters; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 7.  Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants.

Authors:  Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Jaime Iranzo; Sergey A Shmakov; Omer S Alkhnbashi; Stan J J Brouns; Emmanuelle Charpentier; David Cheng; Daniel H Haft; Philippe Horvath; Sylvain Moineau; Francisco J M Mojica; David Scott; Shiraz A Shah; Virginijus Siksnys; Michael P Terns; Česlovas Venclovas; Malcolm F White; Alexander F Yakunin; Winston Yan; Feng Zhang; Roger A Garrett; Rolf Backofen; John van der Oost; Rodolphe Barrangou; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Discovery of widespread type I and type V CRISPR-Cas inhibitors.

Authors:  Nicole D Marino; Jenny Y Zhang; Adair L Borges; Alexander A Sousa; Lina M Leon; Benjamin J Rauch; Russell T Walton; Joel D Berry; J Keith Joung; Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Joseph Bondy-Denomy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A Broad-Spectrum Inhibitor of CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Lucas B Harrington; Kevin W Doxzen; Enbo Ma; Jun-Jie Liu; Gavin J Knott; Alireza Edraki; Bianca Garcia; Nadia Amrani; Janice S Chen; Joshua C Cofsky; Philip J Kranzusch; Erik J Sontheimer; Alan R Davidson; Karen L Maxwell; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Exploring the DNA mimicry of the Ocr protein of phage T7.

Authors:  Gareth A Roberts; Augoustinos S Stephanou; Nisha Kanwar; Angela Dawson; Laurie P Cooper; Kai Chen; Margaret Nutley; Alan Cooper; Garry W Blakely; David T F Dryden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Structure-based functional mechanisms and biotechnology applications of anti-CRISPR proteins.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  CRISPR-Cas is associated with fewer antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pursey; Tatiana Dimitriu; Fernanda L Paganelli; Edze R Westra; Stineke van Houte
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  CRISPR-Cas systems restrict horizontal gene transfer in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Rachel M Wheatley; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  CRISPR-Cas systems are widespread accessory elements across bacterial and archaeal plasmids.

Authors:  Rafael Pinilla-Redondo; Jakob Russel; David Mayo-Muñoz; Shiraz A Shah; Roger A Garrett; Joseph Nesme; Jonas S Madsen; Peter C Fineran; Søren J Sørensen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 19.160

5.  Microbial defenses against mobile genetic elements and viruses: Who defends whom from what?

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; David Bikard
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Widespread repression of anti-CRISPR production by anti-CRISPR-associated proteins.

Authors:  Saadlee Shehreen; Nils Birkholz; Peter C Fineran; Chris M Brown
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 19.160

7.  Molecular basis of anti-CRISPR operon repression by Aca10.

Authors:  So Yeon Lee; Nils Birkholz; Peter C Fineran; Hyun Ho Park
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 8.  Selfish, promiscuous and sometimes useful: how mobile genetic elements drive horizontal gene transfer in microbial populations.

Authors:  Matthieu Haudiquet; Jorge Moura de Sousa; Marie Touchon; Eduardo P C Rocha
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.671

9.  Crystal structure of the anti-CRISPR repressor Aca2.

Authors:  Ben Usher; Nils Birkholz; Izaak N Beck; Robert D Fagerlund; Simon A Jackson; Peter C Fineran; Tim R Blower
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.867

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.