Literature DB >> 33544726

Immunologic monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISPOT) for controlling clinically significant CMV infection in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Euri Seo1,2, Eun Seok Choi1, Jung Hwa Kim1, Hyery Kim1, Kyung-Nam Koh1, Ho Joon Im1, Jina Lee1.   

Abstract

The dynamics of recovery of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and its impact on controlling clinically significant CMV infections following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) are rarely reported in pediatric HSCT recipients. In this study, dynamics of recovery of CMV-specific CMI and its clinical significance in controlling CMV viremia and clinically significant CMV infections were assessed in pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients. All subjects underwent CMV pp65- and IE1-specific enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays just before transplantation and then monthly until the detection of CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 5 spot-forming cells (SFC) / 2.0 × 105 cells. Clinically significant CMV infections were defined as CMV diseases, prolonged CMV infections, recurrent CMV infections or late onset CMV infections. Among 52 recipients, 88.5% of recipients recovered CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 5 SFC/ 2.0 × 105 cells at a median of 34 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 29-95 days) following HSCT, 55.8% at 30 days following HSCT, and 73.1% at 90 days following HSCT. The presence of CMV-specific CMI before HSCT was the significant factors for the reconstitution of CMV specific CMI after HSCT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 13.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21-142.86). After HSCT, 30 recipients experienced CMV viremia, of which 20 were clinically significant CMV infections. The full recovery of CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 50 SFC / 2.0 × 105 cells after HSCT was the protective factor for the development of clinically significant CMV infections (aOR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.22-0.71). In the haploidentical HSCT recipients, 82.1% recovered CMV-specific CMI at a median of 65 days after HSCT (IQR: 34-118 days) with a tendency to recover their CMV-specific CMI later than did those from non-haploidentical donors (65 days vs. 30 days; P = 0.001). Clinically significant CMV infections tended to occur more frequently in the haploidentical HSCT recipients compared to those with matched donor HSCT (46.4% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.205). The full recovery of CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 50 SFC/2.0 × 105 cells after HSCT also lowered the risk of development of clinically significant CMV infections (aOR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01-0.90). However, transplantation from haploidentical donors was a significant risk factor hampering recovery of CMV-specific CMI (aOR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01-0.86) and full recovery of CMV-specific CMI (aOR = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.01-0.50). Pre-transplant CMV-specific CMI influenced the recovery of CMV-specific CMI, and the full recovery of CMV-specific CMI could be a surrogate marker for preventing clinically significant CMV infections in pediatric HSCT recipients. Immunologic monitoring using ELISPOT assay before and after HSCT helps in identifying patients with a high risk of CMV infection and in controlling CMV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33544726      PMCID: PMC7864450          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  31 in total

1.  High risk of death due to bacterial and fungal infection among cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of stem cell transplants from seropositive donors: evidence for indirect effects of primary CMV infection.

Authors:  W Garrett Nichols; Lawrence Corey; Ted Gooley; Chris Davis; Michael Boeckh
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Early recovery of CMV immunity after HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a surrogate biomarker for a reduced risk of severe infections overall.

Authors:  M Noviello; A Forcina; V Veronica; R Crocchiolo; M T L Stanghellini; M Carrabba; R Greco; L Vago; F Giglio; A Assanelli; M R Carbone; Z Magnani; F Crippa; C Corti; M Bernardi; J Peccatori; C Bordignon; F Ciceri; C Bonini; A Bondanza
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  The Ability of a Cytomegalovirus ELISPOT Assay to Predict Outcome of Low-Level CMV Reactivation in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Lynn El Haddad; Ella Ariza-Heredia; Dimpy P Shah; Ying Jiang; Ted Blanchard; Shashank S Ghantoji; Firas El Chaer; Danielle El-Haddad; Amrita Prayag; Lior Nesher; Katy Rezvani; Elizabeth Shpall; Roy F Chemaly
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  State-of-the-art monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific cell-mediated immunity after organ transplant: a primer for the clinician.

Authors:  Adrian Egli; Atul Humar; Deepali Kumar
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Selection of optimal alternative graft source: mismatched unrelated donor, umbilical cord blood, or haploidentical transplant.

Authors:  Karen K Ballen; John Koreth; Yi-Bin Chen; Bimalangshu R Dey; Thomas R Spitzer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Tetramer monitoring to assess risk factors for recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation and reconstitution of antiviral immunity post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  S Borchers; S Luther; U Lips; N Hahn; J Kontsendorn; M Stadler; S Buchholz; H Diedrich; M Eder; U Koehl; A Ganser; E Mischak-Weissinger
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Prospective simultaneous quantification of human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell reconstitution in young recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Daniele Lilleri; Giuseppe Gerna; Chiara Fornara; Laura Lozza; Rita Maccario; Franco Locatelli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Reconstitution of protective immune responses against cytomegalovirus and varicella zoster virus does not require disease development in pediatric recipients of umbilical cord blood transplantation.

Authors:  Natacha Merindol; Insaf Salem Fourati; Rose-Marie Brito; Anne-Julie Grenier; Emily Charrier; Paulo Cordeiro; Martine Caty; Samira Mezziani; Brigitte Malette; Michel Duval; Carolina Alfieri; Philippe Ovetchkine; Françoise Le Deist; Hugo Soudeyns
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Evaluation of intervention strategy based on CMV-specific immune responses after allogeneic SCT.

Authors:  G Avetisyan; J Aschan; H Hägglund; O Ringdén; P Ljungman
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Identification of major factors influencing ELISpot-based monitoring of cellular responses to antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Steven G Smith; Simone A Joosten; Virginie Verscheure; Ansar A Pathan; Helen McShane; Tom H M Ottenhoff; Hazel M Dockrell; Françoise Mascart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.