OBJECTIVES: Thrombin generation (TG) with and without thrombomodulin (TM) was evaluated in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and thromboprophylaxis regimen, in order to understand the prothrombotic profile. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to Medical Departments (MD) or Intensive Care Units (ICU), and 54 healthy controls. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included (mean age 60.4±16.1 years, 68.5% male); 33.7% admitted to ICU. Twenty-four patients (26.9%) were enrolled before thromboprophylaxis administration; 45 patients (50.6%) received standard and 20 (22.5%) intermediate sub-therapeutic dose thromboprophylaxis. Overall, patients with COVID-19 showed a TG profile comparable to that of healthy subjects (i.e. comparable peak height, endogenous thrombin potential [ETP] with and without TM). The only exception was lag time and time to peak, prolonged in COVID-19 patients vs. controls. MD patients showed a similar TG profile to healthy controls, and ICU patients showed significantly decrease ETP (p=0.030) compared to MD. As for thromboprophylaxis, TG profile was significantly increased in COVID-19 patients without thromboprophylaxis vs. controls and vs. those with thromboprophylaxis. In this latter group, ETP inhibition was significantly decreased (p=0.0003) and positively correlated with anti-Xa activity (r=0.49, p=0.0017). However, patients with thromboprophylaxis had similar TG profile vs. controls. Intermediate dose thromboprophylaxis more effectively inhibited TG in severe COVID-19 patients by increasing ETP inhibition via ETP with TM reduction vs. standard dose. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients showed increased TG at diagnosis. Standard thromboprophylaxis reduced TG to levels of healthy controls. Intermediate sub-therapeutic thromboprophylaxis more effectively inhibited TG by decreasing ETP with TM.
OBJECTIVES:Thrombin generation (TG) with and without thrombomodulin (TM) was evaluated in COVID-19patients with different disease severity and thromboprophylaxis regimen, in order to understand the prothrombotic profile. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to Medical Departments (MD) or Intensive Care Units (ICU), and 54 healthy controls. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included (mean age 60.4±16.1 years, 68.5% male); 33.7% admitted to ICU. Twenty-four patients (26.9%) were enrolled before thromboprophylaxis administration; 45 patients (50.6%) received standard and 20 (22.5%) intermediate sub-therapeutic dose thromboprophylaxis. Overall, patients with COVID-19 showed a TG profile comparable to that of healthy subjects (i.e. comparable peak height, endogenous thrombin potential [ETP] with and without TM). The only exception was lag time and time to peak, prolonged in COVID-19patients vs. controls. MD patients showed a similar TG profile to healthy controls, and ICU patients showed significantly decrease ETP (p=0.030) compared to MD. As for thromboprophylaxis, TG profile was significantly increased in COVID-19patients without thromboprophylaxis vs. controls and vs. those with thromboprophylaxis. In this latter group, ETP inhibition was significantly decreased (p=0.0003) and positively correlated with anti-Xa activity (r=0.49, p=0.0017). However, patients with thromboprophylaxis had similar TG profile vs. controls. Intermediate dose thromboprophylaxis more effectively inhibited TG in severe COVID-19patients by increasing ETP inhibition via ETP with TM reduction vs. standard dose. CONCLUSIONS:COVID-19patients showed increased TG at diagnosis. Standard thromboprophylaxis reduced TG to levels of healthy controls. Intermediate sub-therapeutic thromboprophylaxis more effectively inhibited TG by decreasing ETP with TM.
Authors: R J Eck; J J C M van de Leur; R Wiersema; E G M Cox; W Bult; A J Spanjersberg; I C C van der Horst; M V Lukens; R O B Gans; K Meijer; F Keus Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Diana A Gorog; Robert F Storey; Paul A Gurbel; Udaya S Tantry; Jeffrey S Berger; Mark Y Chan; Daniel Duerschmied; Susan S Smyth; William A E Parker; Ramzi A Ajjan; Gemma Vilahur; Lina Badimon; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Hugo Ten Cate; Flora Peyvandi; Taia T Wang; Richard C Becker Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 49.421
Authors: Federico Capone; Alberto Cipriani; Leonardo Molinari; Anna Poretto; Nicolò Sella; Annalisa Boscolo; Elena Campello; Alois Saller; Roberto Vettor; Paolo Navalesi; Anna Maria Cattelan; Paolo Simioni; Luca Spiezia Journal: Adv Med Sci Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 3.287