Literature DB >> 33544006

Research orientation among general practitioners compared to other specialties.

Markku Sumanen1, Tiia Reho1, Teppo Heikkilä2, Pekka Mäntyselkä3,4, Hannu Halila5, Kari Mattila1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The volume of research work done by general practitioners (GP) is modest compared to other specialties. In order to find out reasons for this we examined the current situation concerning research orientation and factors relating to them among Finnish GPs compared to other specialists. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Data from The Physician 2018 Study were used for our research. The study was undertaken in collaboration with all five medical faculties in Finland and the Finnish Medical Association. It compiled information on physicians` social background, work history and career and research plans as well as their views regarding undergraduate and specialist training, values, and professional identity.
SUBJECTS: The basic study population comprised all Finnish doctors under 70 years of age (N = 23,131). Questionnaires were sent to doctors born on even-numbered days (n = 11,336). Altogether 5,214 (45.8%) responded. Responses from GPs (n = 796) were compared with those of doctors in other specialties (n = 3,514). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: The respondents were asked about their current intention to undertake a doctoral degree. Factors associated with this were analysed. Only 7.3% of GPs had completed a doctoral degree. The corresponding figure in other specialties was 32.3% (p < 0.001). In general practice the current intention to undertake a doctoral degree had only slightly increased over ten years. Most GPs had also decided not to undertake a doctorate. The main factors associated with the current intention to complete a doctoral degree were interest in attaining a senior position (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.25-5.24), a position in a university hospital district (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.69-4.94) or other sector than primary care (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.18-2.96), one's father being a doctor (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.09-3.72) and male gender (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05-2.54).
CONCLUSION: Research work in primary health care has been quite sparse. In general practice there is a need to increase teaching and guidance in research work.Key pointsResearch work in primary health care is not very common.Only 7.3% of GPs had completed their doctorate compared to 32.3% in other specialties.A main factor associated with the current intention to complete a doctoral degree was interest in attaining a senior position.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GP education programmes; General practice; doctoral degree; primary health care; research work

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33544006      PMCID: PMC7971219          DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1880072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  16 in total

1.  Research in general practice: law of inverse opportunity.

Authors:  D P Gray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-08

2.  [Facilitating scientific data collection systems].

Authors:  Ilkka Kunnamo; Jukkapekka Jousimaa; Anu Niemi; Peter Nyberg
Journal:  Duodecim       Date:  2014

3.  [General practice research in Finland].

Authors:  Marjukka Mäkelä; Jukka Mattila
Journal:  Duodecim       Date:  2014

4.  The non-clinical contents of GP training need more attention. Results from the Finnish Physician Study.

Authors:  Tiina Aine; Markku Sumanen; Teppo Heikkilä; Harri Hyppölä; Hannu Halila; Jukka Vänskä; Santero Kujala; Irma Virjo; Kari Mattila
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Identifying potential academic leaders: Predictors of willingness to undertake leadership roles in an academic department of family medicine.

Authors:  David White; Paul Krueger; Christopher Meaney; Viola Antao; Florence Kim; Jeffrey C Kwong
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Primary care research network progress in Scotland.

Authors:  Frank Sullivan; Alison Hinds; Marie Pitkethly; Shaun Treweek; Philip Wilson; Sally Wyke
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Under way to academic primary health care.

Authors:  Kaisu Pitkälä; Johan Eriksson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Research networks in primary care: an answer to the call for better clinical research.

Authors:  Guri Rørtveit
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Building a primary care research network - lessons to learn.

Authors:  Tuomas H Koskela
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey.

Authors:  Liam G Glynn; Ciara O'Riordan; Anne MacFarlane; John Newell; Alberto A Iglesias; David Whitford; Peter Cantillon; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.