Literature DB >> 33543554

Early versus late oral feeding following total (pharyngo)laryngectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kristijonas Milinis1,2, Peter Gaskell1,2, Andrew Lau1,2, Jeffrey Lancaster1,2, Terry Jones1,2.   

Abstract

Timing of oral feeding following total laryngectomy is a contentious issue with highly varied practices. Multiple database search was performed to identify studies comparing outcomes of early (≤5 days) versus late (>5 days) oral feeding. Bias assessment was carried out using Cochrane bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The rate of pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) in randomized control trials (RCTs) in early versus late feeding was 15.2% versus 11.7% (RR 1.35, 95%CI [0.68-2.7], p = 0.40). The rate of PCF in the cohort studies was 14.1% versus 20.5% (RR 1.0, 95%CI [0.76-1.3], p = 0.98). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early feeding group (mean difference (days) -4.68 (-6.2 to -3.1, p < 0.0001). Early oral feeding appears to be safe and is associated with shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and the patient characteristics are not representative of current practices.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laryngeal cancer; laryngectomy; oral feeding; pharyngocutaneous fistula; pharyngolaryngectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33543554     DOI: 10.1002/hed.26616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  1 in total

1.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.