Literature DB >> 33543122

Factors Affecting Image Quality and Lesion Evaluability in Breast Diffusion-weighted MRI: Observations from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Multisite Trial (A6702).

Jennifer G Whisenant1,2, Justin Romanoff3, Habib Rahbar4, Averi E Kitsch4, Sara M Harvey5, Linda Moy6, Wendy B DeMartini7, Basak E Dogan8, Wei T Yang9, Lilian C Wang10, Bonnie N Joe11, Lisa J Wilmes11, Nola M Hylton11, Karen Y Oh12, Luminita A Tudorica12, Colleen H Neal13, Dariya I Malyarenko13, Elizabeth S McDonald14, Christopher E Comstock15, Thomas E Yankeelov16, Thomas L Chenevert13, Savannah C Partridge4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The A6702 multisite trial confirmed that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measures can improve breast MRI accuracy and reduce unnecessary biopsies, but also found that technical issues rendered many lesions non-evaluable on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This secondary analysis investigated factors affecting lesion evaluability and impact on diagnostic performance.
METHODS: The A6702 protocol was IRB-approved at 10 institutions; participants provided informed consent. In total, 103 women with 142 MRI-detected breast lesions (BI-RADS assessment category 3, 4, or 5) completed the study. DWI was acquired at 1.5T and 3T using a four b-value, echo-planar imaging sequence. Scans were reviewed for multiple quality factors (artifacts, signal-to-noise, misregistration, and fat suppression); lesions were considered non-evaluable if there was low confidence in ADC measurement. Associations of lesion evaluability with imaging and lesion characteristics were determined. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were compared using bootstrapping.
RESULTS: Thirty percent (42/142) of lesions were non-evaluable on DWI; 23% (32/142) with image quality issues, 7% (10/142) with conspicuity and/or localization issues. Misregistration was the only factor associated with non-evaluability (P = 0.001). Smaller (≤10 mm) lesions were more commonly non-evaluable than larger lesions (p <0.03), though not significant after multiplicity correction. The AUC for differentiating benign and malignant lesions increased after excluding non-evaluable lesions, from 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.71) to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84).
CONCLUSION: Image quality remains a technical challenge in breast DWI, particularly for smaller lesions. Protocol optimization and advanced acquisition and post-processing techniques would help to improve clinical utility. © Society of Breast Imaging 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); artifacts; breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); diagnostic performance; multicenter trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 33543122      PMCID: PMC7835633          DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Imaging        ISSN: 2631-6110


  35 in total

1.  Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo.

Authors:  T G Reese; O Heid; R M Weisskoff; V J Wedeen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Wendy B DeMartini; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Steven W White; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Inhomogeneous static magnetic field-induced distortion correction applied to diffusion weighted MRI of the breast at 3T.

Authors:  Jose R Teruel; Hans E Fjøsne; Agnes Østlie; Dominic Holland; Anders M Dale; Tone F Bathen; Pål E Goa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Motion correction in diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast at 3T.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime S Farley; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid A Mayer; Julie A Means-Powell; Ingrid M Meszoely; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Utility of Diffusion-weighted Imaging to Decrease Unnecessary Biopsies Prompted by Breast MRI: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (A6702).

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Zheng Zhang; Thomas L Chenevert; Justin Romanoff; Averi E Kitsch; Lucy G Hanna; Sara M Harvey; Linda Moy; Wendy B DeMartini; Basak Dogan; Wei T Yang; Lilian C Wang; Bonnie N Joe; Karen Y Oh; Colleen H Neal; Elizabeth S McDonald; Mitchell D Schnall; Constance D Lehman; Christopher E Comstock; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.

Authors:  Maarten W Barentsz; Valentina Taviani; Jung M Chang; Debra M Ikeda; Kanae K Miyake; Suchandrima Banerjee; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yong Guo; You-Quan Cai; Zu-Long Cai; Yuan-Gui Gao; Ning-Yu An; Lin Ma; Srikanth Mahankali; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Justin Romanoff; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Sara M Harvey; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov; Linda Moy; Wendy B DeMartini; Basak E Dogan; Wei T Yang; Lilian C Wang; Bonnie N Joe; Lisa J Wilmes; Nola M Hylton; Karen Y Oh; Luminita A Tudorica; Colleen H Neal; Dariya I Malyarenko; Christopher E Comstock; Mitchell D Schnall; Thomas L Chenevert; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity in patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Min Liu; Jing Bao; Yunbao Xia; Jiuquan Zhang; Lin Zhang; Xuequan Huang; Jian Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accelerated Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging Using Multiband Sensitivity Encoding with the CAIPIRINHA Method: Clinical Experience at 3 T.

Authors:  Debosmita Biswas; Daniel S Hippe; Yi Wang; Michaela R DelPriore; Mladen Zečević; John R Scheel; Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-01

2.  The value of noncontrast MRI in evaluating breast imaging reporting and data system category 0 lesions on digital mammograms.

Authors:  Ruixin Zhang; Maosheng Xu; Changyu Zhou; Xuewei Ding; Huan Lu; Min Ge; Liang Du; Yangyang Bu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.