| Literature DB >> 33543094 |
Deborah Telford1, Renuka M Vesey2, Paul L Hofman2, Silmara Gusso1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of age and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level on walking endurance after 20 weeks of vibration therapy in children and young people with cerebral palsy (CP).Entities:
Keywords: 6MWT, 6-minute walk test; BMI, body mass index; CP, cerebral palsy; Cerebral palsy; Child; GMFCS, Gross Motor Function Classification System; Rehabilitation; Vibration; WBVT, whole-body vibration therapy; Walk test
Year: 2020 PMID: 33543094 PMCID: PMC7853375 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl ISSN: 2590-1095
Participant characteristics, compliance rate, and baseline anthropometric measures by age category and GMFCS level
| Data | All | Age Category (y) | GMFCS Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-10 | 11-15 | 16-20 | II | III | IV | ||
| n | 59 | 15 | 24 | 20 | 44 | 6 | 9 |
| Women:men | 26:33 | 10:5 | 7:17 | 9:11 | 17:27 | 5:1 | 4:5 |
| Age (y) | 13.8±4.3 | 7.4±1.8 | 14.4±1.3 | 17.9±0.1 | 13.7±4.3 | 15.9±4.5 | 12.9±4.1 |
| Compliance (%) | 77±24 | 88±17 | 76±19 | 69±31 | 80±23 | 62±32 | 71±23 |
| Height (cm) | 149.0±20.1 | 121.0±9.7 | 154.8±10.2 | 163.1±12.9 | 152.1±20.9 | 146.3±9.9 | 135.7±15.9 |
| Weight (kg) | 46.3±17.8 | 23.8±6.1 | 47.6±12.0 | 61.7±10.8 | 48.7±18.7 | 43.7±11.4 | 36.6±14.4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.9±1.4 | 16.0±2.2 | 19.6±3.3 | 23.3±3.4 | 20.1±4.0 | 20.1±3.5 | 19.4±5.2 |
NOTE. Values are mean ± SD.
Centiles for anthropometric measures before and after WBVT, by age category and GMFCS level
| Data | Height | Weight | BMI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||||
| All | 29±28 | 29±28 | .80 | 41±31 | 41±31 | .89 | 55±31 | 57±32 | .10 |
| Age (y) | |||||||||
| 5-10 | 37±29 | 36±29 | .27 | 42±32 | 46±34 | .06 | 47±30 | 54±34 | .020 |
| 11-15 | 25±25 | 23±24 | .19 | 36±29 | 35±30 | .47 | 51±33 | 52±35 | .39 |
| 16-20 | 27±31 | 29±32 | .19 | 47±33 | 45±30 | .53 | 67±28 | 66±27 | .41 |
| GMFCS level | |||||||||
| II | 35±28 | 36±28 | .72 | 48±31 | 47±31 | .50 | 57±32 | 57±32 | .53 |
| III | 12±17 | 11±15 | .09 | 22±19 | 23±20 | .16 | 50±27 | 53±27 | .08 |
| IV | 8±17 | 6±13 | .24 | 19±22 | 24±28 | .28 | 53±36 | 60±38 | .12 |
NOTE. Values are mean ± SD.
P<.05.
Fig 1Distance walked in the 6MWT pre- and post-WBVT by age category. Shaded area shows approximate expected distance walked for typical development. Error bars show SE.
Distance walked in 6MWT before and after WBVT, by age category and GMFCS level
| Data | Preintervention | Postintervention | Difference (m) | Change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 335±180 | 376±181 | 41±39 | 12 | <.001 |
| Age (y) | |||||
| 5-10 | 298±160 | 344±163 | 46±28 | 16 | <.001 |
| 11-15 | 347±185 | 382±183 | 34±44 | 10 | .001 |
| 16-20 | 348±194 | 392±197 | 44±40 | 13 | <.001 |
| GMFCS | |||||
| Level II | 424±105 | 467±97 | 43±43 | 10 | <.001 |
| Level III | 110±43 | 154±50 | 44±28 | 40 | .013 |
| Level IV | 49±31 | 77±38 | 28±23 | 57 | .007 |
NOTE. Values are mean ± SD.
P<.05.
Fig 2Distance walked in the 6MWT pre- and post-WBVT by GMFCS level. Shaded area shows approximate expected distance walked for typical development. Error bars show SE.