Literature DB >> 33542945

Automated mesenchymal stem cell segmentation and machine learning-based phenotype classification using morphometric and textural analysis.

Sakina M Mota1, Robert E Rogers2, Andrew W Haskell2, Eoin P McNeill2, Roland Kaunas1,2, Carl A Gregory2, Maryellen L Giger3, Kristen C Maitland1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have demonstrated clinically relevant therapeutic effects for treatment of trauma and chronic diseases. The proliferative potential, immunomodulatory characteristics, and multipotentiality of MSCs in monolayer culture is reflected by their morphological phenotype. Standard techniques to evaluate culture viability are subjective, destructive, or time-consuming. We present an image analysis approach to objectively determine morphological phenotype of MSCs for prediction of culture efficacy. Approach: The algorithm was trained using phase-contrast micrographs acquired during the early and mid-logarithmic stages of MSC expansion. Cell regions are localized using edge detection, thresholding, and morphological operations, followed by cell marker identification using H-minima transform within each region to differentiate individual cells from cell clusters. Clusters are segmented using marker-controlled watershed to obtain single cells. Morphometric and textural features are extracted to classify cells based on phenotype using machine learning.
Results: Algorithm performance was validated using an independent test dataset of 186 MSCs in 36 culture images. Results show 88% sensitivity and 86% precision for overall cell detection and a mean Sorensen-Dice coefficient of 0.849 ± 0.106 for segmentation per image. The algorithm exhibited an area under the curve of 0.816 ( CI 95 = 0.769 to 0.886) and 0.787 ( CI 95 = 0.716 to 0.851) for classifying MSCs according to their phenotype at early and mid-logarithmic expansion, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method shows potential to segment and classify low and moderately dense MSCs based on phenotype with high accuracy and robustness. It enables quantifiable and consistent morphology-based quality assessment for various culture protocols to facilitate cytotherapy development.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell phenotype classification; image segmentation; machine learning; monolayer cell culture; stem cell; viability assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33542945      PMCID: PMC7849042          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.1.014503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  39 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

Review 2.  Characterization of biological processes through automated image analysis.

Authors:  Jens Rittscher
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  High Content Imaging of Early Morphological Signatures Predicts Long Term Mineralization Capacity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells upon Osteogenic Induction.

Authors:  Ross A Marklein; Jessica L Lo Surdo; Ian H Bellayr; Saniya A Godil; Raj K Puri; Steven R Bauer
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Nicholas W Marion; Jeremy J Mao
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Phenotypic and functional comparison of cultures of marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and stromal cells.

Authors:  M K Majumdar; M A Thiede; J D Mosca; M Moorman; S L Gerson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 6.  Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Nico Karssemeijer; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 7.  Stem cell therapy in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Taro Takami; Shuji Terai; Isao Sakaida
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.287

8.  Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity by a fibroblast-neutral red assay.

Authors:  R M Lasarow; R R Isseroff; E C Gomez
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Morphology-based prediction of osteogenic differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Fumiko Matsuoka; Ichiro Takeuchi; Hideki Agata; Hideaki Kagami; Hirofumi Shiono; Yasujiro Kiyota; Hiroyuki Honda; Ryuji Kato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A pulse coupled neural network segmentation algorithm for reflectance confocal images of epithelial tissue.

Authors:  Meagan A Harris; Andrew N Van; Bilal H Malik; Joey M Jabbour; Kristen C Maitland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biomanufacturing in low Earth orbit for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Arun Sharma; Rachel A Clemens; Orquidea Garcia; D Lansing Taylor; Nicole L Wagner; Kelly A Shepard; Anjali Gupta; Siobhan Malany; Alan J Grodzinsky; Mary Kearns-Jonker; Devin B Mair; Deok-Ho Kim; Michael S Roberts; Jeanne F Loring; Jianying Hu; Lara E Warren; Sven Eenmaa; Joe Bozada; Eric Paljug; Mark Roth; Donald P Taylor; Gary Rodrigue; Patrick Cantini; Amelia W Smith; Marc A Giulianotti; William R Wagner
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 7.294

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.