| Literature DB >> 33542633 |
Zhi-Yong Zhang1, Ming-Xu Li1, Hai Yu1, Jun Zhao1, Feng-Lin Xiao1, Fang Xuan1, Yi-Xin Zhao1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Chronic renal failure has become a major public health concern and treatment strategies are urgently needed. We aimed to investigate whether combination of hemodialysis modes was superior to regular hemodialysis for patients under maintenance hemodialysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 144 patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) were enrolled in this single-center retrospective study. Patients received regular hemodialysis (HD) were included in HD group (n=52), patients received regular HD plus hemodiafiltration (HDF) in HD/HDF group (n=47), patients received the combination of regular HD, HDF and hemoperfusion (HP) in HD/HDF/HP group (n=45). After 1-month and 24-months treatment, therapeutic effects were assessed in terms of nutritional status, control of complications, dialysis adequacy, mean arterial pressure (MAP), infection rate and living quality.Entities:
Keywords: end-stage renal failure; hemodiafiltration; hemodialysis; hemoperfusion; maintenance hemodialysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33542633 PMCID: PMC7853439 DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S288023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag ISSN: 1176-6336 Impact factor: 2.423
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients
| Subjects | HD (n=52) | HD/HF (n=47) | HD/HF/HP (n=45) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 28/24 | 22/25 | 25/20 | 0.117 |
| Age (year)a | 46.1±10.7 | 47.6±11.9 | 57.5±13.7 | 0.901 |
| Weight (kg)a | 66.7±10.1 | 65.3±12.4 | 64.8±11.5 | 0.462 |
| Diabetes (number, %) | 33 (63.5%) | 32 (68.1%) | 28 (62.2%) | 0.823 |
| Hypertension (number, %) | 39 (75.0%) | 37 (78.7%) | 34 (75.6%) | 0.898 |
| Hospitalization due to vascular access problems (number, %) | 13 (25.0%) | 11 (23.4%) | 10 (22.2%) | 0.949 |
Note: aData in mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Serum albumin (sALB) level of different treatments regimens after 1 month or 24 months of treatment. Regular hemodialysis: HD, HD and hemodiafiltration: HD/HDF, HD/HDF and hemoperfusion: HD/HDF/HP. *P<0.05 vs HD group.
Comparison of Incidence of Malnutrition, BI, HAMD of Different Treatments Regimens After 1 Month and 24 Months of Treatment
| Time | HD (n=52) | HD/HDF (n=47) | HD/HDF/HP (n=45) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence of malnutrition | 1 month | 9.6% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 0.981 |
| 24 month | 38.5% | 25.5%* | 26.7%* | 0.048 | |
| BIa | 1 month | 86±7 | 85±12 | 83±8 | 0.080 |
| 24 month | 80±10 | 84±9* | 88±8* | 0.041 | |
| HAMDa | 1 month | 6±2 | 7±2 | 7±3 | 0.112 |
| 24 month | 13±4 | 10±3* | 7±4* | 0.028 |
Notes: aData in mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs HD group.
Abbreviations: BI, the Barthel Index; HAMD, the Hamilton Depression Scale.
Figure 2Serum biochemical index related to complication control with different treatments regimens after 1 month or 24 months of treatment. (A) Hemoglobin (Hb), (B) carbon dioxide combining power (CO2CP), (C) potassium (K+), (D) calcium (Ca2+), (E) phosphorus (P), (F) intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH). Regular hemodialysis: HD, HD and hemodiafiltration: HD/HDF, HD/HDF and hemoperfusion: HD/HDF/HP. *P<0.05 vs HD group; #P<0.05 vs HD/HDF group.
Comparison of Kt/v, MAP, Infection Rate of Different Treatments Regimens After 1 Month and 24 Months of Treatment
| Time | HD (n=52) | HD/HDF (n=47) | HD/HDF/HP (n=45) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kt/va | 1 month | 1.42±0.32 | 1.45±0.35 | 1.45±0.74 | 0.138 |
| 24 month | 1.12±0.43 | 1.65±0.64* | 1.52±0.71* | 0.013 | |
| MAP (mmHg)a | 1 month | 97±13 | 96±14 | 97±16 | 0.264 |
| 24 month | 96±12 | 92±11* | 92±14* | 0.016 | |
| Infection rate | 1 month | 3.8% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 0.842 |
| 24 month | 48.1% | 23.4%* | 22.2%* | 0.008 |
Notes: aData in mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs HD group.
Abbreviations: Kt/v, dialyzer clearance of urea multiplied by dialysis time and normalized for urea distribution volume; MAP, mean arterial pressure.