Literature DB >> 33542477

Chromosomal evolution in Raphicerus antelope suggests divergent X chromosomes may drive speciation through females, rather than males, contrary to Haldane's rule.

Terence J Robinson1, Halina Cernohorska2, Svatava Kubickova2, Miluse Vozdova2, Petra Musilova2, Aurora Ruiz-Herrera3,4.   

Abstract

Chromosome structural change has long been considered important in the evolution of post-zygotic reproductive isolation. The premise that karyotypic variation can serve as a possible barrier to gene flow is founded on the expectation that heterozygotes for structurally distinct chromosomal forms would be partially sterile (negatively heterotic) or show reduced recombination. We report the outcome of a detailed comparative molecular cytogenetic study of three antelope species, genus Raphicerus, that have undergone a rapid radiation. The species are largely conserved with respect to their euchromatic regions but the X chromosomes, in marked contrast, show distinct patterns of heterochromatic amplification and localization of repeats that have occurred independently in each lineage. We argue a novel hypothesis that postulates that the expansion of heterochromatic blocks in the homogametic sex can, with certain conditions, contribute to post-zygotic isolation. i.e., female hybrid incompatibility, the converse of Haldane's rule. This is based on the expectation that hybrids incur a selective disadvantage due to impaired meiosis resulting from the meiotic checkpoint network's surveillance of the asymmetric expansions of heterochromatic blocks in the homogametic sex. Asynapsis of these heterochromatic regions would result in meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and, if this persists, germline apoptosis and female infertility.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33542477     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82859-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  51 in total

Review 1.  Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation.

Authors:  Arcadi Navarro; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Chromosomal speciation revisited: rearranging theory with pieces of evidence.

Authors:  Rui Faria; Arcadi Navarro
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Chromosomes, conflict, and epigenetics: chromosomal speciation revisited.

Authors:  Judith D Brown; Rachel J O'Neill
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 4.  Chromosome speciation: humans, Drosophila, and mosquitoes.

Authors:  Francisco J Ayala; Mario Coluzzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolving Inversions.

Authors:  Rui Faria; Kerstin Johannesson; Roger K Butlin; Anja M Westram
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Eco-Evolutionary Genomics of Chromosomal Inversions.

Authors:  Maren Wellenreuther; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Semipermeable species boundaries between Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis: evidence from multilocus DNA sequence variation.

Authors:  N J Besansky; J Krzywinski; T Lehmann; F Simard; M Kern; O Mukabayire; D Fontenille; Y Touré; N'F Sagnon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Recombination map of the common shrew, Sorex araneus (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia).

Authors:  Pavel M Borodin; Tatyana V Karamysheva; Nadezhda M Belonogova; Anna A Torgasheva; Nikolai B Rubtsov; Jeremy B Searle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Recombination rates and genomic shuffling in human and chimpanzee--a new twist in the chromosomal speciation theory.

Authors:  Marta Farré; Diego Micheletti; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Felicity C Jones; Manfred G Grabherr; Yingguang Frank Chan; Pamela Russell; Evan Mauceli; Jeremy Johnson; Ross Swofford; Mono Pirun; Michael C Zody; Simon White; Ewan Birney; Stephen Searle; Jeremy Schmutz; Jane Grimwood; Mark C Dickson; Richard M Myers; Craig T Miller; Brian R Summers; Anne K Knecht; Shannon D Brady; Haili Zhang; Alex A Pollen; Timothy Howes; Chris Amemiya; Jen Baldwin; Toby Bloom; David B Jaffe; Robert Nicol; Jane Wilkinson; Eric S Lander; Federica Di Palma; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sex differences in the meiotic behavior of an XX sex chromosome pair in males and females of the mole vole Ellobius tancrei: turning an X into a Y chromosome?

Authors:  Ana Gil-Fernández; Sergey Matveevsky; Marta Martín-Ruiz; Marta Ribagorda; María Teresa Parra; Alberto Viera; Julio S Rufas; Oxana Kolomiets; Irina Bakloushinskaya; Jesús Page
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.316

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.