Literature DB >> 33542326

New machine learning and physics-based scoring functions for drug discovery.

Isabella A Guedes1,2, André M S Barreto1, Diogo Marinho1, Eduardo Krempser3, Mélaine A Kuenemann2, Olivier Sperandio2,4, Laurent E Dardenne5, Maria A Miteva6,7.   

Abstract

Scoring functions are essential for modern in silico drug discovery. However, the accurate prediction of binding affinity by scoring functions remains a challenging task. The performance of scoring functions is very heterogeneous across different target classes. Scoring functions based on precise physics-based descriptors better representing protein-ligand recognition process are strongly needed. We developed a set of new empirical scoring functions, named DockTScore, by explicitly accounting for physics-based terms combined with machine learning. Target-specific scoring functions were developed for two important drug targets, proteases and protein-protein interactions, representing an original class of molecules for drug discovery. Multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine and random forest algorithms were employed to derive general and target-specific scoring functions involving optimized MMFF94S force-field terms, solvation and lipophilic interactions terms, and an improved term accounting for ligand torsional entropy contribution to ligand binding. DockTScore scoring functions demonstrated to be competitive with the current best-evaluated scoring functions in terms of binding energy prediction and ranking on four DUD-E datasets and will be useful for in silico drug design for diverse proteins as well as for specific targets such as proteases and protein-protein interactions. Currently, the MLR DockTScore is available at www.dockthor.lncc.br .

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33542326     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  55 in total

1.  In Need of Bias Control: Evaluating Chemical Data for Machine Learning in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Jochen Sieg; Florian Flachsenberg; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 2.  Receptor-ligand molecular docking.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Camila S de Magalhães; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2013-12-21

3.  Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes.

Authors:  Lukas P Pason; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.353

4.  Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.

Authors:  Joffrey Gabel; Jérémy Desaphy; Didier Rognan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Huiyong Sun; Xiaojun Yao; Dan Li; Lei Xu; Youyong Li; Sheng Tian; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Protein-Ligand Empirical Interaction Components for Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Yuna Yan; Weijun Wang; Zhaoxi Sun; John Z H Zhang; Changge Ji
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  H J Böhm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Maciej Wójcikowski; Pedro J Ballester; Pawel Siedlecki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Predicting complexation performance between cyclodextrins and guest molecules by integrated machine learning and molecular modeling techniques.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhao; Zhuyifan Ye; Yan Su; Defang Ouyang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 11.413

View more
  22 in total

1.  Pathogenomic in silico approach identifies NSP-A and Fe-IIISBP as possible drug targets in Neisseria Meningitidis MC58 and development of pharmacophores as novel therapeutic candidates.

Authors:  Madhavi Joshi; Maitree Purohit; Dhriti P Shah; Devanshi Patel; Preksha Depani; Premkumar Moryani; Amee Krishnakumar
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.364

2.  Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.

Authors:  Rocco Meli; Garrett M Morris; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Front Bioinform       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 3.  Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning.

Authors:  Chris Avery; John Patterson; Tyler Grear; Theodore Frater; Donald J Jacobs
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-09-06

4.  Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Bixa orellana and Its Component Ellagic Acid Exert Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Properties against Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense.

Authors:  Roberval Nascimento Moraes-Neto; Gabrielle Guedes Coutinho; Ana Caroline Santos Ataíde; Aline de Oliveira Rezende; Camila Evangelista Carnib Nascimento; Rafaela Pontes de Albuquerque; Cláudia Quintino da Rocha; Adriana Sousa Rêgo; Maria do Socorro de Sousa Cartágenes; Ana Lúcia Abreu-Silva; Igor Victor Ferreira Dos Santos; Cleydson Breno Rodrigues Dos Santos; Rosane Nassar Meireles Guerra; Rachel Melo Ribeiro; Valério Monteiro-Neto; Eduardo Martins de Sousa; Rafael Cardoso Carvalho
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

5.  3pHLA-score improves structure-based peptide-HLA binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Anja Conev; Didier Devaurs; Mauricio Menegatti Rigo; Dinler Amaral Antunes; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Hierarchical Virtual Screening Based on Rocaglamide Derivatives to Discover New Potential Anti-Skin Cancer Agents.

Authors:  Igor V F Dos Santos; Rosivaldo S Borges; Guilherme M Silva; Lúcio R de Lima; Ruan S Bastos; Ryan S Ramos; Luciane B Silva; Carlos H T P da Silva; Cleydson B R Dos Santos
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 7.  Resources and computational strategies to advance small molecule SARS-CoV-2 discovery: lessons from the pandemic and preparing for future health crises.

Authors:  Natesh Singh; Bruno O Villoutreix
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  Nanoscale slip length prediction with machine learning tools.

Authors:  Filippos Sofos; Theodoros E Karakasidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Drug design and repurposing with DockThor-VS web server focusing on SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic targets and their non-synonym variants.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Leon S C Costa; Karina B Dos Santos; Ana L M Karl; Gregório K Rocha; Iury M Teixeira; Marcelo M Galheigo; Vivian Medeiros; Eduardo Krempser; Fábio L Custódio; Helio J C Barbosa; Marisa F Nicolás; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  In Silico Research of New Therapeutics Rotenoids Derivatives against Leishmania amazonensis Infection.

Authors:  Adrián Vicente-Barrueco; Ángel Carlos Román; Trinidad Ruiz-Téllez; Francisco Centeno
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.