Literature DB >> 33542265

Repetitive visual cortex transcranial random noise stimulation in adults with amblyopia.

Richard Donkor1, Andrew E Silva1, Caroline Teske1, Margaret Wallis-Duffy1, Aaron P Johnson2,3,4, Benjamin Thompson5,6,7.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that five daily sessions of visual cortex transcranial random noise stimulation would improve contrast sensitivity, crowded and uncrowded visual acuity in adults with amblyopia. Nineteen adults with amblyopia (44.2 ± 14.9 years, 10 female) were randomly allocated to active or sham tRNS of the visual cortex (active, n = 9; sham, n = 10). Sixteen participants completed the study (n = 8 per group). tRNS was delivered for 25 min across five consecutive days. Monocular contrast sensitivity, uncrowded and crowded visual acuity were measured before, during, 5 min and 30 min post stimulation on each day. Active tRNS significantly improved contrast sensitivity and uncrowded visual acuity for both amblyopic and fellow eyes whereas sham stimulation had no effect. An analysis of the day by day effects revealed large within session improvements on day 1 for the active group that waned across subsequent days. No long-lasting (multi-day) improvements were observed for contrast sensitivity, however a long-lasting improvement in amblyopic eye uncrowded visual acuity was observed for the active group. This improvement remained at 28 day follow up. However, between-group differences in baseline uncrowded visual acuity complicate the interpretation of this effect. No effect of tRNS was observed for amblyopic eye crowded visual acuity. In agreement with previous non-invasive brain stimulation studies using different techniques, tRNS induced short-term contrast sensitivity improvements in adult amblyopic eyes, however, repeated sessions of tRNS did not lead to enhanced or long-lasting effects for the majority of outcome measures.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33542265     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80843-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  61 in total

1.  Strabismic amblyopia. Part 1. Psychophysics.

Authors:  Lisa Asper; David Crewther; Sheila Gillard Crewther
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment.

Authors:  Ann L Webber; Joanne Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Stereo-deficients and stereoblinds cannot make utrocular discriminations.

Authors:  R Barbeito; D Levi; S Klein; D Loshin; H Ono
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification.

Authors:  R F Hess; E R Howell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Amblyopia prevalence and risk factors in Australian preschool children.

Authors:  Amy Shih-I Pai; Kathryn A Rose; Jody F Leone; Sharimawati Sharbini; George Burlutsky; Rohit Varma; Tien Yin Wong; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in an older community. The Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  P Mitchell; W Smith; J J Wang; K Attebo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Contrast sensitivity and vernier acuity in amblyopic monkeys.

Authors:  L Kiorpes; D C Kiper; J A Movshon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Hyperacuity and amblyopia.

Authors:  D M Levi; S Klein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 10.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Random noise stimulation in the treatment of patients with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Mateo A Herrera-Murillo; Mario Treviño; Elias Manjarrez
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 6.058

Review 2.  Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Modulates Neural Processing of Sensory and Motor Circuits, from Potential Cellular Mechanisms to Behavior: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Weronika Potok; Onno van der Groen; Marc Bächinger; Dylan Edwards; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  Transcranial random noise stimulation and exercise do not modulate ocular dominance plasticity in adults with normal vision.

Authors:  Xiaoxin Chen; Kennedy Hall; William R Bobier; Benjamin Thompson; Arijit Chakraborty
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.