Literature DB >> 33540639

High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters.

Yakov Vega1, Assaf Gershoni1,2, Asaf Achiron1,2, Raimo Tuuminen3,4, Yehonatan Weinberger1,2, Eitan Livny1,2, Yoav Nahum1,2, Irit Bahar1,2, Uri Elbaz1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the contribution of anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements to intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula.
METHODS: Measurements taken with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) swept-source biometry of 501 right eyes of 501 consecutive patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery between January 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed. IOL power was calculated using the BUII formula, first through the inclusion of all measured variables and then by using partial biometry data. For each calculation method, the IOL power targeting emmetropia was recorded and compared for the whole cohort and stratified by axial length (AL) of the measured eye.
RESULTS: The mean IOL power calculated for the entire cohort using all available parameters was 19.50 ± 5.11 diopters (D). When comparing it to the results obtained by partial biometry data, the mean absolute difference ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 D; p < 0.001. The optional variables (ACD, LT, WTW) had the least effect in long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm; mean absolute difference ranging from 0.02 to 0.07 D; p < 0.001), while the greatest effect in short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm; mean absolute difference from 0.10 to 0.21 D; p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes with a mean absolute IOL dioptric power difference more than 0.25 D was the highest (32.0%) among the short AL group when using AL and keratometry values only.
CONCLUSIONS: Using partial biometry data, the BUII formula in small eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm) resulted in a clinically significant difference in the calculated IOL power compared to the full biometry data. In contrast, the contribution of the optional parameters to the calculated IOL power was of little clinical importance in eyes with AL longer than 22 mm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett Universal II formula; axial length; cataract surgery; intraocular lens calculation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33540639     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  Uri Elbaz; Ruti Sella; Olga Reitblat; Sina Khalili; Asim Ali; Kamiar Mireskandari; Yakov Vega; Raimo Tuuminen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Strategies for formula constant optimisation for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Nóra Szentmáry; Alan Cayless; Jascha Wendelstein; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Predictability of 6 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in People With Very High Myopia.

Authors:  Yi-Ching Chu; Tzu-Lun Huang; Pei-Yao Chang; Wei-Ting Ho; Yung-Ray Hsu; Shu-Wen Chang; Jia-Kang Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.