| Literature DB >> 33540513 |
Byuk Sung Ko1, Sung-Hyuk Choi2, Tae Gun Shin3, Kyuseok Kim4, You Hwan Jo5, Seung Mok Ryoo6, Yoo Seok Park7, Woon Yong Kwon8, Han Sung Choi9, Sung Phil Chung10, Gil Joon Suh8, Hyunggoo Kang1, Tae Ho Lim1, Donghee Son11, Won Young Kim6.
Abstract
This study aimed to address the impact of 1-hr bundle achievement on outcomes in septic shock patients. Secondary analysis of multicenter prospectively collected data on septic shock patients who had undergone protocolized resuscitation bundle therapy at emergency departments was conducted. In-hospital mortality according to 1-h bundle achievement was compared using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients were also divided into 3 groups according to the time of bundle achievement and outcomes were compared to examine the difference in outcome for each group over time: group 1 (≤1 h reference), group 2 (1-3 h) and group 3 (3-6 h). In total, 1612 patients with septic shock were included. The 1-h bundle was achieved in 461 (28.6%) patients. The group that achieved the 1-h bundle did not show a significant difference in in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the 1-h bundle on multivariable logistic regression analysis (<1 vs. >1 h) (odds ratio = 0.74, p = 0.091). However, 3- and 6- h bundle achievements showed significantly lower odds ratios of in-hospital mortality compared to the group that did not achieve the bundle (<3 vs. >3 h, <6 vs. >6 h, odds ratio = 0.604 and 0.458, respectively). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality over time for group 2 and 3 compared to that of group 1. One-hour bundle achievement was not associated with improved outcomes in septic shock patients. These data suggest that further investigation into the clinical implications of 1-h bundle achievement in patients with septic shock is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: 1-h bundle; emergency department; mortality; outcome; sepsis; septic shock
Year: 2021 PMID: 33540513 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241