Nathan Morelli1, Haley Morelli2. 1. Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, 900 S Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. Electronic address: nathan.morelli@uky.edu. 2. Rehabilitation Department, Chandler Medical Center at University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) exhibit deteriorated balance and gait performance during dual task (DT) conditions. Impaired dual tasking is related to increased fall risk and lower quality of life in PwMS. While dual task interventions have proven effective in various patient populations, evidence is lacking to support the use of DT interventions to improve clinical measures of balance and gait in PwMS. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the effectiveness of DT intervention at improving balance and gait in PwMS. METHODS: A systematic search was completed using CINHAL, PubMed and MEDLINE. Methodological quality, level of evidence and recommendations for included studies was assessed by two reviewers. Effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals comparing single and DT outcomes were calculated for all balance and gait variables. RESULTS: Five randomized control trials (RCTs) were included for review. Of the 23 effect sizes calculated, three had 95% confidence intervals which did not pass zero and were therefore interpreted as strong. Due to inconsistent level one evidence of DT interventions being superior to single task balance and gait interventions a grade B recommendation was given. CONCLUSION: There is inconsistent evidence supporting the use of DT interventions to improve clinical balance measures in PwMS. There is supportive evidence for the use of DT interventions to improve both single and DT gait speed. However, there was heterogeneity between interventions and dosage among RCTs. Despite multiple promising findings, DT interventions appear to have minimal impact on clinical balance and gait measures in PwMS.
BACKGROUND:People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) exhibit deteriorated balance and gait performance during dual task (DT) conditions. Impaired dual tasking is related to increased fall risk and lower quality of life in PwMS. While dual task interventions have proven effective in various patient populations, evidence is lacking to support the use of DT interventions to improve clinical measures of balance and gait in PwMS. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the effectiveness of DT intervention at improving balance and gait in PwMS. METHODS: A systematic search was completed using CINHAL, PubMed and MEDLINE. Methodological quality, level of evidence and recommendations for included studies was assessed by two reviewers. Effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals comparing single and DT outcomes were calculated for all balance and gait variables. RESULTS: Five randomized control trials (RCTs) were included for review. Of the 23 effect sizes calculated, three had 95% confidence intervals which did not pass zero and were therefore interpreted as strong. Due to inconsistent level one evidence of DT interventions being superior to single task balance and gait interventions a grade B recommendation was given. CONCLUSION: There is inconsistent evidence supporting the use of DT interventions to improve clinical balance measures in PwMS. There is supportive evidence for the use of DT interventions to improve both single and DT gait speed. However, there was heterogeneity between interventions and dosage among RCTs. Despite multiple promising findings, DT interventions appear to have minimal impact on clinical balance and gait measures in PwMS.
Authors: Nathan Morelli; Selina M Parry; Angela Steele; Megan Lusby; Ashley A Montgomery-Yates; Peter E Morris; Kirby P Mayer Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.889
Authors: Clint Hansen; Maximilian Beckbauer; Robbin Romijnders; Elke Warmerdam; Julius Welzel; Johanna Geritz; Kirsten Emmert; Walter Maetzler Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 3.390