Literature DB >> 33540206

Adaptive disclosure, a combat-specific PTSD treatment, versus cognitive-processing therapy, in deployed marines and sailors: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Brett T Litz1, Luke Rusowicz-Orazem2, Gheorghe Doros2, Breanna Grunthal3, Matthew Gray4, William Nash5, Ariel J Lang6.   

Abstract

Adaptive Disclosure (AD) is a new emotion-focused psychotherapy for combat-related PTSD. As a second step in the evaluation process, we conducted a non-inferiority (NI) trial of AD, relative to Cognitive Processing Therapy - Cognitive Therapy version (CPT-C), an established first-line psychotherapy. Participants were 122 U.S. Marines and Sailors. The primary endpoint was PTSD symptom severity change from pre- to posttreatment, using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV. Secondary endpoints were depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9) and functioning (Veterans Rand Health Survey-12; VR-12). For cases with complete data, the mean difference in CAPS-IV change scores was 0.33 and the confidence interval (CI) did not include the predefined NI margin (95% CI =-10.10, 9.44). The mean difference in PHQ-9 change scores was -1.01 and the CI did not include the predefined margin (95% CI = -3.31, 1.28), as was the case for the VR-12 Physical Component and VR-12 Mental Component subscale scores (0.27; 95% CI = -4.50, 3.95, and -2.10; 95% CI = -7.03, 2.83, respectively). A series of intent-to-treat sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. The differential effect size for CAPS-IV was d = 0.01 (nonsignificant). As predicted, Adaptive Disclosure was found to be no less effective than a first-line psychotherapy. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active-duty; Mental health; Military

Year:  2021        PMID: 33540206     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  6 in total

1.  Moral Injury and Recovery in Uniformed Professionals: Lessons From Conversations Among International Students and Experts.

Authors:  Jonathan Jin; Kyle Weiman; Suzette Bremault-Phillips; Eric Vermetten
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Potential Circumstances Associated With Moral Injury and Moral Distress in Healthcare Workers and Public Safety Personnel Across the Globe During COVID-19: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Yuanxin Xue; Jillian Lopes; Kimberly Ritchie; Andrea M D'Alessandro; Laura Banfield; Randi E McCabe; Alexandra Heber; Ruth A Lanius; Margaret C McKinnon
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 3.  Moral Injury, Chaplaincy and Mental Health Provider Approaches to Treatment: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Fardous Hosseiny; Andrea J Phelps; Kimberley A Jones; Isabella Freijah; Lindsay Carey; R Nicholas Carleton; Peter Devenish-Meares; Lisa Dell; Sara Rodrigues; Kelsey Madden; Lucinda Johnson
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 4.  Encountering children and child soldiers during military deployments: the impact and implications for moral injury.

Authors:  Myriam Denov
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2022-08-11

5.  Initial development of perpetrator confrontation using deepfake technology in victims with sexual violence-related PTSD and moral injury.

Authors:  Agnes van Minnen; F Jackie June Ter Heide; Tilly Koolstra; Ad de Jongh; Sezer Karaoglu; Theo Gevers
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  Association Between Responsibility for the Death of Others and Postdeployment Mental Health and Functioning in US Soldiers.

Authors:  Amanda J Khan; Laura Campbell-Sills; Xiaoying Sun; Ronald C Kessler; Amy B Adler; Sonia Jain; Robert J Ursano; Murray B Stein
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.